The right to translation in Belgian criminal proceedings: Between legal obligations and practical constraints
This article examines the implementation of the Directive 2010/64/EU, and more specifically its provisions on written language assistance, in Belgian criminal proceedings. In order to investigate both top-down regulations and on-the-ground practices, a case study was conducted at the Ghent correctional court, including a policy review, analysis of criminal case files, and interviews with judicial actors. The study finds that the right to written translation is rarely exercised. Due to the restricted transposition of the Directive provisions into national legislation, local judicial authorities do not proactively provide translated procedural documents and defendants are often unaware of their right to translation. Instead of providing written translations, judicial authorities systematically rely on oral interpretation or summaries, despite the Directive stipulating that these should be the exception rather than the norm. Although the Directive was designed to strengthen fair trial protections, its impact remains limited in practice.
Keywords:
- limited language proficiency,
- language access,
- written language assistance,
- legal translation,
- criminal proceedings,
- Directive 2010/64/EU,
- translation policy
Publication history
Table of contents
To ensure a fair trial, defendants in criminal proceedings in the European Union (EU) have a number of basic procedural rights, such as the right to information and the right to legal counsel. These rights allow defendants to actively participate in the proceedings and defend themselves, but can be jeopardized if defendants do not understand the language of the proceedings, which may make it difficult for them to understand procedural documents or communicate with their legal counsel. In order to ensure that a defendant is “able to understand what is happening and to make him/herself understood” the European institutions have been working since the early 2000s to develop a legal framework that guarantees the provision of language assistance in all EU member states. These efforts resulted in Directive 2010/64/EU. This directive grants defendants who do not understand the language of the proceedings two types of free language assistance throughout the proceedings: (a) interpreter assistance during oral communication with the authorities and the defendants’ legal counsel and (b) translations of certain procedural documents.
References
Amato, Amalia, and Gabriele Mack
2015 “The
IMPLI Project, Pre-Trial Interpreting in Italy and the Transposition of Directive 2010/64
EU.” TRANS Revista de
Traductología 1 (19): 43–56. https://doi.org/10.24310/TRANS.2015.v1i19.2091
Angermeyer, Philipp
Sebastian
2015 Speak English or What?
Codeswitching and Interpreter Use in New York City
Courts. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
BBVT
2016 “Gerechtstolken en -vertalers van de regen in de drop [Court interpreters
and translators, out of the frying pan into the
fire].” Accessed February 26,
2025. https://www.lexgo.be/nl/nieuws/2016/09/gerechtstolken-en-vertalers-van-de-regen-in-de-drop,106653.html
2017 “Gerechtstolken hekelen wantoestanden binnen Justitie [Court interpreters
denounce mismanagement within the Justice
Department].” Accessed February
26, 2025. https://www.jubel.be/gerechtstolken-hekelen-wantoestanden-binnen-justitie/
Berk-Seligson, Susan
2017 The
Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. 2nd
ed. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226329475.001.0001
Blasco
Mayor, María
Jesús, and Maribel del
Pozo Triviño
2015 “Legal
Interpreting in Spain at a Turning Point.” MonTI: Monografías de Traducción e
Interpretación 7: 9–40.
Bloch, Alain
2019 Het strafdossier, een straf dossier [The criminal case file, quite a
file]. Brugge: Die
Keure.
Brannan, James
2017 “Identifying
Written Translation in Criminal Proceedings as a Separate Right: Scope and Supervision under European
Law.” JoSTrans: The Journal of Specialised
Translation 27: 43–57. https://doi.org/10.26034/cm.jostrans.2017.258
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke
2006 “Using
Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in
Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chioni-Chotouman, Chara
2018 “The
Right to Translation and Interpretation in Criminal Proceedings: Providing a Common Code between the Defendant and the
Court.” Cambridge Law
Review 3: 66–85.
Cras, Steven, and Luca
de Matteis
2010 “The
Directive on Interpretation and Translation in Criminal
Proceedings.” Eucrim 4: 153–162. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2010-015
Delva, Sara, Sarah
van Hoof, and
Katrijn Maryns
2026 “Language
Assistance in the Criminal Court: How Fair Is It to Substitute Written Translation with Oral
Interpreting?” Interpreting. Published ahead of
print. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00135.del
European Commission
2018 COM(2018) 857
final. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Implementation of Directive 2010/64/EU of
the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the Right to Interpretation and Translation in Criminal
Proceedings. Brussels: European
Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0857
European
Commission
2021 “September Infringements Package: Key
Decisions.” Accessed February
26, 2025. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/EN/INF_21_4681
European Commission
2023 “January
Infringements Package: Key Decisions.” Accessed February 26, 2025. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/EN/inf_23_142
Fair Trials
2020 Practitioners’ Tools on
EU Law. Interpretation and Translation Directive. London. https://www.fairtrials.org/app/uploads/2021/12/FT-Toolkit-on-Right-to-Interpretation-and-Translation-Directive.pdf
Fingas, Maciej
2019 “The
Right to Interpretation and Translation in Criminal Proceedings: Challenges and Difficulties Stemming from the Implementation
of the Directive 2010/64/EU.” EuCLR European Criminal Law
Review 9 (2): 175–186. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2019-2-175
Gallai, Fabrizio
2013 “ ‘I’ll
Just Intervene Whenever He Finds It a Bit Difficult to Answer’: Exploding the Myth of Literalism in Interpreted
Interviews.” Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice
(II-RP) 5 (1): 57–78.
Gialuz, Mitja
2019 “The
Implementation of the Directive on Linguistic Assistance in Italy, between Changes to the Code of Criminal Procedure and
Case-Law Resistance.” In EU Criminal Justice: Fundamental Rights,
Transnational Proceedings and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, edited
by Tommaso Rafaraci and Rosanna Belfiore, 27–41. Cham: Springer
International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97319-7_2
Giustini, Deborah
2021 “ ‘The
Whole Thing is Really Managing Crisis’: Practice Theory Insights into Interpreters’ Work Experiences of Success and
Failure.” The British Journal of
Sociology 72 (4): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12843
González
Núñez, Gabriel
2013 “Translating
for Linguistic Minorities in Northern Ireland: A Look at Translation Policy in the Judiciary, Healthcare, and Local
Government.” Current Issues in Language
Planning 14 (3–04): 474–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.827036
2016 “On
Translation Policy.” Target: International Journal of Translation
Studies 28 (1): 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.28.1.04gon
Hale, Sandra
Beatriz
2004 The Discourse of Court
Interpreting: Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness, and the
Interpreter. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.52
Hertog, Erik
2015 “Directive
2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Right to Interpretation and Translation in Criminal
Proceedings: Transposition Strategies with Regard to Interpretation and Translation.” MonTI:
Monografías de Traducción e
Interpretación 7: 73–100.
Jacobs, Marie
2024 “Choosing
Is Losing: Language Policy and Language Choice Acts at the Asylum Law Firm.” Language
Policy 23 (2): 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-023-09683-2
Katschinka, Liese
2014 “The
Impact of Directive 2010/64/EU on the Right to Interpretation and Translation in Criminal
Proceedings.” In Traduzione e interpretazione per la
società e le istituzioni [Translation and interpreting for society and
institutions], edited by Caterina Falbo and Maurizio Viezzi, 105–114. Trieste: EUT
Edizioni Università di Trieste.
Meylaerts, Reine
2011 “Translational
Justice in a Multilingual World: An Overview of Translational Regimes.” Meta: Journal Des
Traducteurs / Meta: Translators’
Journal 56 (4): 743–757. https://doi.org/10.7202/1011250ar
Meylaerts, Reine, and Gabriel
González Núñez
2018 “No
Language Policy without Translation Policy: A Comparison of Flanders and Wales.” Language
Problems and Language
Planning 42 (2): 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00028.mey
Meylaerts, Reine
2021 “Language
and Translation Policies in a Bilingual City with a Multilingual Population: The Case of
Brussels.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and the
City, edited by Tong
King Lee. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436468-9
Muñoz de Morales
Romero, Marta
2020 “Shades
of Light and Darkness: The Spanish Transposition of EU Directives on the Rights of Suspected and Accused
Persons.” European Criminal Law
Review 10 (January): 48–65. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2020-1-48
NLLB
Team, Marta
R. Costa-jussà, James Cross, Onur Çelebi, Maha Elbayad, Kenneth Heafield, Kevin Heffernan, et al.
2022 “No
Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation.” arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04672
Orlando, Daniele
2016 “Legal
Translation as a Human Right: Ensuring a Fair Trial through Translation Quality and
Training.” New Voices in Translation
Studies 14 (1): 23–45.
Pavlenko, Aneta
2023 “Language
Proficiency as a Matter of Law: Judicial Reasoning on Miranda Waivers by Speakers with Limited English Proficiency
(LEP).” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law / Revue Internationale de Sémiotique
Juridique 37 (2): 329–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10037-8
Pöchhacker, Franz
2004 Introducing
Interpreting
Studies. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203504802
QSR International Pty Ltd
2020 NVivo.
V13.
Riehle, Cornelia, and Allison Clozel
2020 “10
Years after the Roadmap: Procedural Rights in Criminal Proceedings in the EU Today.” ERA
Forum 20 (3): 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-019-00579-5
Romans, Stéphanie, Piet Depuydt, and Bert Broens
2024 “Honderden experts niet betaald door tekort van 20 miljoen bij Justitie [Hundreds of experts unpaid due to 20 million shortfall at the Justice
Department].” De
Tijd, November 2.
Schouppe, Ward
2024 “Tolken protesteren aan gerechtsgebouw in Gent: ‘We zijn al sinds de zomer niet
betaald’ [Interpreters protest outside courthouse in Ghent: ‘We haven’t been
paid since summer’].” VRT NWS, November 29.
Spolsky, Bernard
2003 Language
Policy: Key Topics in
Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615245
Stake, Robert
E.
1995 The Art of Case Study
Research. Thousand
Oaks: Sage.
Statbel
2022 “Insufficient
Knowledge of the Language is the Main Barrier on the Belgian Labour
Market.” Accessed September 25,
2025. https://statbel.fgov.be/en/news/insufficient-knowledge-language-main-barrier-belgian-labour-market
2025 “36% of the Belgian
Population has Foreign Background.” Accessed September 25, 2025. https://statbel.fgov.be/en/themes/population/structure-population/origin
Stevens, Sarah
2020 “Invisible
Touch: Analyzing the Language Conduit Theory through the Lens of Translation and Interpreting
Principles.” UMKC Law
Review 88 (3): 771–790.
Traest, Philip
2011 “Het proces-verbaal van verhoor en/of aangifte [The official
record of interrogation and/or complaint].” Cahiers
Politiestudies 21 (4): 33–52.
Trechsel, Stefan
2006 Human
Rights in Criminal Proceedings. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271207.001.0001
Van den
Wyngaert, Chris, Steven Vandromme, and Philip Traest
2022 Strafrecht en strafprocesrecht in hoofdlijnen [Criminal law and
criminal
procedure]. Antwerpen: Gompel&Svacina.
Vanden Bosch
2017 “Het recht op vertolking en vertaling in strafzaken en de omzetting van de
EU-richtlijnen [The right to interpretation and translation in criminal
cases and the transposition of the EU directives].” Tijdschrift voor
Strafrecht [Journal for criminal
law] 2: 79–107.
Verliefde, Sofie, and Bart Defrancq
2023 “Interpreter-Mediated
Access to the Written Record in Police
Interviews.” Perspectives 31 (3): 519–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2022.2089045
Vieira, Lucas
Nunes, Minako O’Hagan, and Carol O’Sullivan
2021 “Understanding
the Societal Impacts of Machine Translation: A Critical Review of the Literature on Medical and Legal Use
Cases.” Information, Communication &
Society 24 (11): 1515–1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1776370
Vogiatzis, Nikos
2022 “Interpreting
the Right to Interpretation under Article 6(3)(e) ECHR: A Cautious Evolution in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of
Human Rights?” Human Rights Law
Review 22 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngab027