Article In: AILA Review: Online-First Articles
Dealing with topics of potential cross‑cultural sensitivity among transnational groups of pre-service language teachers in video‑mediated virtual exchange interactions
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Conversations involving potentially sensitive topics across cultures pose challenges not only for L2 speakers
engaged in intercultural communication but also for researchers seeking to understand the mechanisms of such interactions. Digital
spaces have long offered rich affordances to address these challenges — primarily by facilitating easier cross-cultural access and
creating pedagogically and interculturally meaningful interactive environments. This article explores one such setting:
video-mediated interactions among pre-service language teachers within the scope of a virtual exchange project between Türkiye and
Poland. Using multimodal conversation analysis, the study examines how participants manage cross-culturally sensitive topics
(e.g., religion and history/war) on a turn-by-turn basis during video-mediated interactions. I argue that virtual exchange
contexts can serve as ‘safe’ spaces for ‘brave’ conversations and for engaging with sensitive issues, where topic initiations do
not typically lead to tension or conflict — even when the legitimacy of the topic may be negotiable. The findings reveal that
sensitive topics are managed through a variety of interactional resources, including laughter, topic continuers or shifters,
extended elaborations, or brief and counter-argumentative responses, depending on the topic initiated. The findings offer new
insights into the challenges and affordances of digital spaces for applied linguistics, intercultural communication, and language
teacher education research.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Methods
- Analysis and findings: Dealing with potentially sensitive topics across cultures
- Discussion and conclusion
References
References (87)
Arano, Y. (2019). Interculturality
as an interactional achievement: Doubting others’ nationality and accounting for the
doubt. Journal of International and Intercultural
Communication, 12(2), 167–189.
Badem, A., & Balaman, U. (2025). Word
search sequences in video-mediated task-oriented L2 interactions: Affordances for intercultural
exchange. Language and Intercultural
Communication, 0(0), 1–15.
Badem-Korkmaz, F., & Balaman, U. (2020). Third
position repair for resolving troubles in understanding teacher instructions. Linguistics and
Education, 60, 100859.
Badem-Korkmaz, F., Ekin, S., & Balaman, U. (2022). Pre-service
language teachers’ resistance to teacher trainer advice on task design for video-mediated L2
interaction. Classroom
Discourse, 13(2), 212–230.
Balaman, U. (2023). Conversation
analytic language teacher education in digital spaces. Palgrave Macmillan.
Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic
perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language
Learning &
Technology, 7(2), 68–99. [URL].
Belz, J. A., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Internet-mediated
intercultural foreign language education. Thomson Heinle. [URL]
Bilki, Z., Satar, M., & Sak, M. (2023). Critical
digital literacy in virtual exchange for ELT teacher education: An interpretivist
methodology. ReCALL, 35(1), 58–73.
Bolden, G. B. (2014). Negotiating
understanding in “intercultural moments” in immigrant family interactions. Communication
Monographs, 81(2), 208–238.
Brandt, A., & Jenks, C. (2011). ‘Is
it okay to eat a dog in Korea…like China?’ Assumptions of national food-eating practices in intercultural
interaction. Language and Intercultural
Communication, 11(1), 41–58.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching
and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Chun, D. M. (2011). Developing
intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. CALICO
Journal, 28(2), 392–419. [URL].
Çimenli, B., Sert, O., & Jenks, C. (2022). Topic
maintenance in video-mediated virtual exchanges: Rolling the ball back in L2
interactions. System, 108, 102834.
Çolak, F., & Balaman, U. (2025). Dealing
with divergent feedback trajectories in video-mediated, transnational, and collaborative task design
meetings. Learning, Culture and Social
Interaction, 54, 100936.
Colpaert, J. (2020). Editorial
position paper: How virtual is your research? Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 33(7), 653–664.
Day, D. (2008). Being
ascribed, and resisting, membership of an ethnic group. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities
in
Talk (pp. 151–170). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Dooly, M. A. (2011). Crossing
the intercultural borders into 3rd space culture(s): Implications for teacher education in the twenty-first
century. Language and Intercultural
Communication, 11(4), 319–337.
Dooly, M. A., & Sadler, R. (2013). Filling
in the gaps: Linking theory and practice through telecollaboration in teacher
education. ReCALL, 25.
Dooly, M. A., & Tudini, V. (2016). ‘Now
we are teachers’: The role of small talk in student language teachers’ telecollaborative task
development. Journal of
Pragmatics, 102, 38–53.
(2022). ‘We
should google that’: The dynamics of knowledge-in-interaction in an online student
meeting. Classroom
Discourse, 13(2), 188–211.
Drixler, N. (2022). Features
of online second language interactional competence in a German-Israeli virtual exchange. TESOL
in Context, 30(2), Article
2.
Ekin, S. (2025). Development
of interactional competence in a virtual exchange setting: Focus on diversification of participatory
actions. International Journal of Qualitative
Methods, 24.
Ekin, S., & Balaman, U. (2024). Video-mediated
collaborative lesson planning in virtual exchange among transnational teams of pre-service language
teachers. ReCALL, 1–17.
Ekin, S., Balaman, U., & Badem-Korkmaz, F. (2024). Tracking
telecollaborative tasks through design, feedback, implementation, and reflection processes in pre-service language teacher
education. Applied Linguistics
Review, 15(1), 31–60.
Fukuda, C. (2006). Resistance
against being formulated as cultural other: The case of a Chinese student in Japan. Pragmatics.
Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association
(IPrA), 429–456.
Glimäng, M. R. (2022). Safe/brave
spaces in virtual exchange on sustainability. Journal of Virtual
Exchange, 5, 61–81.
Glimäng, M. R., & Magadán, C. (2024). Saying
and doing: A multiliteracies analysis of preservice teachers’ virtual exchange at the onset of
COVID-19. Language and Intercultural
Communication, 24(3), 241–258.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Telecollaboration
as an approach to developing intercultural communication competence. [URL]
Hansen, A. D. (2005). A
Practical Task: Ethnicity as a Resource in Social Interaction. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 38(1), 63–104.
Hauck, M. (2019). Virtual
exchange for (critical) digital literacy skills development. European Journal of Language
Policy, 11(2), 187–210.
(2023). From
virtual exchange to critical virtual exchange and critical internationalization at home. The
Global Impact
Exchange, 2023(Spring), 9–12.
Hauser, E. (2017). Avoiding
initiation of repair in L2 conversations-for-learning. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the
International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 235–256.
Havadar, E. E., & Balaman, U. (2024). Preliminaries
in paired role play L2 interactional competence assessment tasks. Classroom
Discourse, 15(2), 143–160.
Helm, F. (2015). The
practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning
&
Technology, 19(2), 197–217.
(2016). Facilitated
dialogue in online intercultural exchange. In R. O’Dowd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Online
intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy,
practice (pp. 150–172). Routledge.
Higgins, C. (2007). Constructing
membership in the in-group: Affiliation and resistance among urban Tanzanians. Pragmatics.
Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association
(IPrA), 49–70.
(2009). Are
you Hindu?”: Resisting membership categorization through language
alternation. In H. t. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction:
Multilingual
perspectives, (pp. 111–136). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii.
Hua, Z., Wei, L., & Jankowicz-Pytel, D. (2019). Intercultural
moments in translating and humanising the socio-legal system. Language and Intercultural
Communication, 19(6), 488–504.
Jenks, C. (2012). Doing
being reprehensive: Some interactional features of English as a lingua franca in a chat
room. Applied
Linguistics, 33(4), 386–405.
Kanat Mutluoğlu, A., & Balaman, U. (2023). The
use of Video Enhanced Observation in video-mediated post-observation conversations on pre-service EFL teachers’ online
practicum
teaching. System, 118, 103151.
Kardaş İşler, N. (2025). Dealing
with controversial issues in primary school classroom interactions in social studies
courses. Learning and
Instruction, 96, 102076.
Kim, Y. (2019). ‘What
is stoyr-steruh type?’: Knowledge asymmetry, intersubjectivity, and learning opportunities in
conversation-for-learning. Applied
Linguistics, 40(2), 307–328.
Kim, Y., & Silver, R. E. (2021). “What
do you think about this?”: Differing role enactment in post-observation
conversation. In S. Kunitz, N. Markee, & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based
conversation analytic research: Theoretical and applied perspectives on
pedagogy (Vol. 46, pp. 303–328). Springer International Publishing.
Klimanova, L., & Hellmich, E. A. (2021). Crossing
transcultural liminalities with critical virtual exchange: A study of shifting border
discourses. Critical Inquiry in Language
Studies, 18(3), 273–304.
Kurek, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2017). Task
design for telecollaborative exchanges: In search of new
criteria. System, 64, 7–20.
Loranc-Paszylk, B., Hilliker, S. M., & Lenkaitis, C. A. (2021). Virtual
exchanges in language teacher education: Facilitating reflection on teaching practice through the use of
video. TESOL
Journal, n/a(n/a), e580.
Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Topical
talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology
Quarterly, 301–316.
Moalla, A., Abid, N., & Balaman, U. (2020). Task-enhanced
virtual exchange between University of Sfax, Tunisia, and Hacettepe University,
Turkey. In F. Helm & A. Beaven (Eds.), Designing
and implementing virtual exchange — a collection of case studies (1st
ed., pp. 117–126). Research-publishing.net.
Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary
issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social
interaction. Journal of
Pragmatics, 145, 47–62.
Mori, J. (2003). The
construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American
students. Research on Language & Social
Interaction, 36(2), 143–184.
(2007). Reconstructing
the participants’ treatments of ‘interculturality’: Variations in data and
methodologies. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association
(IPrA), 123–141.
Nao, M. (2015). ‘So
you are from England’: Categorization and cultural reduction in first-time conversation lounge encounters between foreign
teachers and Japanese students of EFL. Applied
Linguistics, 36(2), 194–214.
Nicolaou, A., Sauro, S., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Sundqvist, P. (2025). Critical
virtual exchange to address teachers’ needs in times of conflict. Journal of Virtual
Exchange, 8, 54–66.
Nishizaka, A. (1995). The
interactive constitution of interculturality: How to be a Japanese with words. Human
Studies, 18(2–3), 301–326.
(1999). Doing
interpreting within interaction: The interactive accomplishment of a “Henna Gaijin” or “Strange
Foreigner.” Human
Studies, 22(2–4), 235–251.
Nowicka, A. (2022). Negotiating
religious identity categories in non-professional interviews using English as a lingua
franca. Intercultural
Pragmatics, 19(1), 103–131.
O’Dowd, R. (2018). From
telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving
forward. Journal of Virtual
Exchange, 1–23.
O’Dowd, R., & Lewis, T. (2016). Online
intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. Routledge.
Oittinen, T. (2022). Negotiating
collaborative and inclusive practices in university students’ group-to-group videoconferencing
sessions. Linguistics and
Education, 71, 101107.
Önder, Z., & Balaman, U. (2025). Situated
orientations to interculturality in video-mediated virtual exchange
interactions. In H. R’boul (Ed.), Teaching
and researching interculturality in the Middle East and North
Africa (pp. 203–221). Routledge.
Park, J.-E. (2007). Co-construction
of nonnative speaker identity in cross-cultural interaction. Applied
Linguistics, 28(3), 339–360.
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Balaman, U. (2021). The
routinization of grammar as a social action format: A longitudinal study of video-mediated
interactions. Research on Language and Social
Interaction, 54(2), 183–202.
Petitjean, C., & González-Martínez, E. (2015). Laughing
and smiling to manage trouble in French-language classroom interaction. Classroom
Discourse, 6(2), 89–106.
Ryoo, H.-K. (2007). Interculturality
serving multiple interactional goals in African American and Korean service
encounters. Pragmatics, 17(1), 23–47.
Sacks, H. (1972a). An
initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing
sociology. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies
in social
interaction (pp. 31–74). Free Press. [URL]
(1972b). On
the analysability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions
in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of
Communication (pp. 325–345). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [URL]
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A
simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for
conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Satar, M., & Çimenli Olcars, B. (2025). Online
intercultural exchange in language teacher education: Interactional resources for topic
transition. Classroom
Discourse, 1–29.
Satar, M., Hauck, M., & Bilki, Z. (2023). Multimodal
representation in virtual exchange: A social semiotic approach to critical digital
literacy. Language Learning &
Technology, 27(2), 72–96.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A
tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, Special Issue: Diversity and
Continuity in Conversation
Analysis, 39(3), 462–482.
Schmiderer, K., Brocca, N., Guggenbichler, E., & Konzett-Firth, C. (2025). Exploring
pre-service teachers’ criteria for evaluating collaboratively designed online
tasks. TASK, 5(1), 57–87.
Sert, O., & Ishino, M. (2025). Collaborative
noticing of multimodality in language classroom interaction: A telecollaboration project between student-teachers of English
in Sweden and Japan. TESOL
Journal, 16(4), e70072.
Sert, O., & Jacknick, C. M. (2015). Student
smiles and the negotiation of epistemics in L2 classrooms. Journal of
Pragmatics, 77, 97–112.
Shrikant, N. (2021). Cultural
difference as a resource for arguments in institutional interactions. Communication
Monographs, 88(2), 219–236.
Siegel, A. (2016). “Oh
no, it’s just culture”: Multicultural identities in action in ELF interactions. Journal of
Asian Pacific
Communication, 26(2), 193–215.
Tudini, V. (2007). Negotiation
and intercultural learning in Italian native speaker chat rooms. The Modern Language
Journal, 91(4), 577–601.
Tudini, V., & Dooly, M. A. (2021). Complaining
for rapport building: Troubles talk in a preservice language teacher online video
exchange. Linguistics and
Education, 64, 100941.
Turan, P., & Yiğitoğlu Aptoula, N. (2025). Managing
intersubjectivity through screen-sharing in video-mediated reflective feedback sessions in pre-service language teacher
education. System, 103608.
Uyar, G., & Balaman, U. (2025). Claims
of teacher learning and retrospective tracing of claimed events in video-mediated transnational virtual exchange
interactions. Applied Linguistics.
Uyar, G., & Can Daşkın, N. (2024). Change
of epistemic stance of transnational pre-service teachers in-and-through collaborative data-led reflective
dialogues. Bogazici University Journal of
Education, 41(1), 35–51.
Üzüm, B., Akayoglu, S., & Yazan, B. (2020). Using
telecollaboration to promote intercultural competence in teacher training classrooms in Turkey and the
USA. ReCALL, 32(2), 162–177.
Walsh, S., & Mann, S. (2015). Doing
reflective practice: A data-led way forward: ELT
Journal, 69(4), 351–362.
Whitehead, K. A., Raymond, G., & Stokoe, E. H. (2024). Analyzing
categorial phenomena in talk-in-interaction. In J. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.), The
Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods in Conversation
Analysis (pp. 541–576). Cambridge University Press. [URL].
Zimmerman, E. (2007). Constructing
Korean and Japanese interculturality in talk: Ethnic membership categorization among users of
Japanese. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association
(IPrA), 71–94.