Cover not available

In:Motivation in Language: A cognitive perspective
Edited by Grzegorz Drożdż and Barbara Taraszka-Drożdż
[Human Cognitive Processing 83] 2027
► pp. 255–288

Chapter 11
Motivation of painting conceptualizations in Polish discourse on music

 | University of Silesia in Katowice
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Music discourse is a complex form of discourse, largely due to its markedly metaphorical character. This chapter focuses on one recurrent type of such figurative language: the conceptualizations from the painting domain used to describe diverse facets in the musical domain. The study is corpus-assisted and draws on texts from websites addressed to musicians and others from the broadly defined music industry. Grounded in cognitive linguistics, the study aims to reconstruct the major types of painting-based conceptualizations to account for these people’s motivation to use that language. The analysis shows that these conceptualizations are shaped by a range of diverse motivational factors, including conceptual-pragmatic, as well as perceptual, embodied, affective, cultural, and community-specific communicative factors.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical and methodological background
    • 2.1The theoretical framework
    • 2.2Research questions and methodology
  • 3.An analysis of painting conceptualizations
    • 3.1Preliminary quantitative findings
    • 3.2Types of painting conceptualizations in music discourse
      • 3.2.1The creator of music
      • 3.2.2The music creator’s toolkit
      • 3.2.3Musical material
      • 3.2.4The music-creation process
      • 3.2.5The musical work and its reception
    • 3.3Normative and argumentative functions of painting metaphors
  • 4.Observations and discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (55)
References
Antović, M. 2015. Metaphor in music or metaphor about music: A contribution to the cooperation of cognitive linguistics and cognitive musicology. SSRN Electronic Journal. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. Musical metaphors in Serbian and Romani children: An empirical study. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(3), 184–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chodkowski, A. (Ed.). 2006. Encyklopedia muzyki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormac, J. 2017. Liszt and the symphonic poem. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ES = Estrada i Studio. Available at: [URL]
Fillmore, C. J. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. 1994. The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IM = InfoMusic.pl. Available at: [URL]
Kövecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. 1951. The modern system of the arts: A study in the history of aesthetics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 12(4), 496–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1952. The modern system of the arts: A study in the history of aesthetics. Journal of the History of Ideas, 13(1), 17–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Concept, image, symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In S. Kemmer, & M. Barlow (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Cognitive Grammar. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (421–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Ten lectures on the elaboration of Cognitive Grammar. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MC = Muzykuj.com. Available at: [URL]
MG = Magazyn Gitarzysta. Available at: [URL]
Minsky, M. 1974. A framework for representing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MN = Muzyk.net. Available at: [URL]
MP = Magazyn Perkusista. Available at: [URL]
Panther, K.-U. 2013. Motivation in language. In S. Kreitler (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (407–432). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. Motivation. In X. Wen, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (297–313). New York & London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2022. Introduction to cognitive pragmatics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 4]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G. 2011. Introduction: Reflections on motivation revisited. In K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.), Motivation in grammar and the lexicon [Human Cognitive Processing 27] (1–26). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Panther, K.-U. 2004. Introduction: Reflections on motivation. In G. Radden, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (1–46). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. 1977. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schreiber, E. 2021. Metafory pojęciowe w muzyce współczesnej na przykładzie refleksji i twórczości Györgya Ligetiego. In Metafory ucieleśnione (119–144). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Academicon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šeškauskienė, I., & Levandauskaitė, T. 2013. Conceptualising music: Metaphors of classical music reviews. Studies About Languages, 23, 78–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw-Miller, S. 2002. Visible deeds of music: Art and music from Wagner to Cage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Eye hEar: The visual in music. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shiner, L. 2001. The Invention of Art: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SJP = Słownik języka polskiego PWN. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. Available at: [URL]
Soares da Silva, A. 2021. Introduction: Figurative language: Intersubjectivity and usage. In A. Soares da Silva (Ed.), Figurative language — intersubjectivity and usage [Figurative Thought and Language 11] (1–15). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2026. Prototypes, (inter)subjectification, figurativity and semantic change: Evidence from Portuguese. In A. Rogos-Hebda, & H. Tissari (Eds.), At the crossroads of historical and cognitive linguistics [Figurative Thought and Language 21] (122–146). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taraszka-Drożdż, B. 2014. Schémas d’extension métaphorique. À partir de l’analyse des contenus et des organisations conceptuels de certaines unités lexicales se référant à la lumière. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016a. Lexical and grammatical dimensions of metaphor: A Cognitive Grammar perspective. In G. Drożdż (Ed.), Studies in lexicogrammar: Theory and applications (175–192). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016b. Zmysłowe wymiary dźwięku w terminologii muzycznej. In G. Gwóźdź, & P. Mamet (Eds.), Dyskursy specjalistyczne 2. Rejestry, gatunki, tłumaczenia (171–187). Częstochowa: Wydawnictwo im. S. Podobińskiego Akademii im. Jana Długosza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Kartofle i ziemniaki w muzyce, czyli o twórczym wykorzystaniu potencjału językowego z perspektywy semantyki encyklopedycznej. Język Polski, 99(4), 59–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2022. Pojęciowe podstawy kulinarnych konceptualizacji w polskim dyskursie o muzyce. Prace Językoznawcze, 24(4), 45–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taruskin, R. 2005. The Oxford history of Western music. Vol. 1: The earliest notations to the sixteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. The Oxford history of Western music. Vol. 3: Music in the nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vergo, P. 2010. The music of painting: Music, modernism and the visual arts from the Romantics to John Cage. London: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
WSJP = Wielki słownik języka polskiego. Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN. Available at: [URL]
Young, J. 2015. The ancient and modern system of the arts. British Journal of Aesthetics, 55(1), 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zbikowski, L. M. 2008. Metaphor and music. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (502–523). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue