Article In: Historiographia Linguistica: Online-First Articles
Louis-Lucien Bonaparte, nineteenth-century English dialects, and nineteenth-century dialectology
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Louis-Lucien Bonaparte is a key figure in Euskara studies and in documenting the dialectal interrelationships
among Romance languages, but he was also engaged in describing and distinguishing English dialects. As with other languages, he
outlined differences among English dialects by having native speakers of those dialects translate books of the Bible into them.
This article examines the practice of translation as a means of recording language variation and Bonaparte’s commitment to it and
describes the English dialect program he developed. Dialect translation exposed the need for a phonetic alphabet, which Bonaparte
lacked, although several attempts at such an alphabet were in progress at the time. As a result, he was necessarily concerned
about the dialectal accuracy of the translations he commissioned. Bonaparte gifted one of his translators, Henry Baird, with a
specially bound and illustrated collection of his English dialect pamphlets, now held in the Madeline Kripke Collection of
Historical Lexicography at the Lilly Library, Indiana University. Into that collection, Baird tipped in letters from Bonaparte
about the problems of phonetic representation in the Biblical translations — transcribed in the article — which provide us with
concrete evidence of Bonaparte’s method, as well as his concerns about it.
Résumé
Louis-Lucien Bonaparte a joué un rôle clé dans les études basques et dans la documentation des
interrelations dialectales au sein des langues romanes, mais il s’est aussi impliqué dans la description et la différenciation des
dialectes anglais. De même que pour les autres langues, afin de mettre en exergue les différences entre les dialectes de
l’anglais, il demandait à des locuteurs natifs de traduire dans ces derniers des livres de la Bible. Dans cet article, nous
examinons la pratique de la traduction en tant que méthode de relevé de la variation dialectale, et l’adhésion de Bonaparte à
cette méthode, et nous décrivons le programme de dialectologie anglaise qu’il développa. Les traductions en dialecte ont mis en
évidence le besoin d’un alphabet phonétique, dont Bonaparte était dépourvu, bien qu’à l’époque plusieurs tentatives fussent en
cours d’élaboration. En conséquence, il avait nécessairement pour souci d’assurer l’exactitude dialectale des traductions qu’il
commanditait. A l’un de ses traducteurs, Henry Baird, Bonaparte fit don d’un recueil de ses livrets de dialectes anglais,
spécialement reliés et illustrés pour l’occasion. L’exemplaire se trouve maintenant à la Madeline Kripke Collection of Historical
Lexicography de la Lilly Library à l’Université d’Indiana. Dans ce recueil, Baird inséra des lettres de Bonaparte concernant les
problèmes de la représentation phonétique dans les traductions de la Bible — transcrites dans cet article — lettres grâce
auxquelles nous disposons de preuves concrètes de la méthode de Bonaparte et des préoccupations qui l’animaient.
Zusammenfassung
Louis-Lucien Bonaparte war nicht nur eine Schlüsselfigur in der Erforschung des Baskischen sowie der
Dialektzusammenhänge zwischen romanischen Sprachen, sondern er beschäftigte sich auch intensiv mit der Abgrenzung und Beschreibung
englischer Dialekte. Wie bei anderen Sprachen erfasste er Unterschiede zwischen diesen Dialekten aufgrund selbst erhobener Daten
von Dialektsprechern, die für ihn Teile der Bibel übersetzten. Dieser Artikel untersucht, wie Bonaparte die Übersetzungsmethode
als Mittel zur Erfassung sprachlicher Variation einsetzte und beschreibt das von ihm entwickelte Programm zur Erforschung
englischer Dialekte. Seine Übersetzungsmethode erforderte ein phonetisches Alphabet, über das Bonaparte damals noch nicht
verfügte, obwohl bereits mehrere Versuche unternommen worden waren, ein solches Alphabet zu entwickeln. Ihn trieb denn auch die
Sorge um, dass die in Auftrag gegebenen Übersetzungen die Dialekte präzise erfassen. Bonaparte schenkte einem der Übersetzer,
Henry Baird, eine gebundene und illustrierte Sammlung seiner englischen Dialektschriften, die sich heute in der Madeline Kripke
Collection of Historical Lexicography der Lilly Library an der Indiana University befindet. Die Sammlung enthält Briefe
Bonapartes, die von Baird eingefügt wurden. Darin beschäftigt sich Bonaparte mit Fragen der phonetischen Wiedergabe in den
Bibelübersetzungen (im Artikel werden Transkriptionen geboten), die uns konkrete Hinweise auf seine Methode und seine
diesbezüglichen Überlegungen liefern.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Bonaparte among the philologists
- 2.1Bonaparte’s reputation among nineteenth-century philologists and twentieth-century dialectologists
- 2.2Bonaparte’s English and scots translations
- 2.3Dialect translation and dialectology
- 3.Bonaparte, Baird, and phonetic transciption
- 3.1Where book history intersects with the history of linguistics
- 3.2Bonaparte’s letters to Baird
- 3.2.1Letter No. 1
- 3.2.2Letter No. 2
- 3.2.3Letter No. 3
- 3.3Bonaparte, orthography, and mid-nineteenth-century dialectology
- 4.Conclusions
- Notes
- Author queries
References
References (53)
Adelung, Johann Christoph. 1816. Mithridates oder Allgemeine
Sprachenkunde Ed. by Johann Severin Vater. 31 Vols. Berlin: Vossischen Buchhandlung.
Albright, Robert William. 1953. The International Phonetic
Alphabet: Its Backgrounds and Development. Ph.D.
dissertation, Stanford University.
]. 1850. Letters
in the Devonshire Dialect by Nathan Hogg. Second
edition. London: Chapman and Hall.
Bell, Alexander Melville. 1867. Visible Speech: The science of
universal alphabetics. London: Simkin, Marshall, and Company.
Bland, Richard L. 2014. “A Glimpse at the Beginning of
Language Studies on the Northwest Coast: Johann Christoph Adelung’s Mithridates oder Allgemeine
Sprachenkunde”. Journal of Northwest
Anthropology 48:1. 69–92.
Bonaparte, Louis-Lucien. 1873. Classification
des Dialectes Anglais Modernes. London: Privately printed.
. 1876. “On
the Dialects of Monmouthshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire, Gloucestershire, Berkshire, Oxfordshire, South Warwickshire,
South Northamptonshire, Buckinghamshire, Hertfordshire, Middlesex, and Surrey, with a New Classification of the English
Dialects”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 161. 570–579.
. 1881a. “On
Portuguese Simple Sounds, Compared with Those of Spanish, Italian, French, and
English”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 181. 23–41.
. 1881b. “The
Simple Sounds of All the Living Slavonic Languages Compared with Those of the Principal Neo-Latin and Germano-Scandinavian
Tongues”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 181. 373–460.
. 1884a. “Names
of European Reptiles in the Living Neo-Latin Languages”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 191. 312–354.
. 1884b. “Words
Connected with the Vine in Latin and the Neo-Latin Dialects”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 191. 251–311.
. 1884c. “Neo-Latin
Names for artichoke”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 19: 1
appendix. 41–45.
. 1884d. “Initial
Mutations in the Living Celtic, Basque, Sardinian, and Italian Dialects”. Transactions of the
Philological Society 191. 155–202.
. 1884f. “Italian
and Uralic Possessive Suffixes Compared”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 191. 485–491.
. 1890. “Albanian,
Modern Greek, Gallo-Italic, Provencal, and Illyrian Still in Use (1889) as Linguistic Islands in the Neapolitan and Sicilian
Provinces of Italy”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 211. 335–364.
Cassidy, F. G. 1993. “On
Creole Orthography”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole
Languages 81. 135–137.
Considine, John. 2017. Small
Dictionaries and Curiosity: Lexicography and fieldwork in post-medieval
Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dictionary of American Regional
English. 1985–2013. ed. by Frederic G. Cassidy, Joan Houston Hall et al. 61 Vols. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Dollinger, Stefan. 2015. The
Written Questionnaire in Social Dialectology: History, theory, practice. IMPACT
40. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ehrman, Albert. 1960. “The
Private Press and Publishing Activities of Prince Louis-Lucien Bonaparte”. The Book
Collector 91. 31–37.
Ellis, Alexander J. 1866. “On Palæotype; or, or, the
Representation of Spoken Sounds for Philological Purposes”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 12:Supp.1). 1–52.
1874. “Second Annual Address of the
President to the Philological Society”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 151. 201–252.
Gilliver, Peter. 2016. The
Making of the Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamans, Camiel. 2017. “The
Return of the Prodigal Sn“”. Scripta Neophilologica
Posnaniensia 171. 103–116.
Hamp, Eric. 1874. “On
Bonaparte and the Neogrammarians as Field Workers”. Studies in the History of Linguistics:
Traditions and paradigms ed. by Dell Hymes, 390–433. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Hurch, Bernhard, ed. 2026. Hugo
Schuchardt Archiv. [URL]
Jamieson, John. 1808. Etymological
Dictionary of the Scottish
Language. 21 vols. Edinburgh: W. Creech.
Kurath, Hans & Guy S. Lowman. 1970. The
Dialectal Structure of Southern England: Phonological Evidence. (=Publication of the American
Dialect Society, 54). Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
Local, John K. 1983. “Making a Transcription: The
evolution of A. J. Ellis’ Palaeotype”. Journal of the International Phonetic
Association 131. 2–12.
Maciver, Ruiaridh. 2024. “Call
to Recognise Napoleon’s Nephew as Gaelic Studies « Pioneer »”. BBC 〈[URL]〉
MacMahon, M. K. C. 1985. “James
Murray and the Phonetic Notation of the New English Dictionary”. Transactions
of the Philological
Society 831. 72–112.
MacMahon, Michael K. C. 1991. “The Woman Behind
« Arthur »”. Journal of the International Phonetic
Association 211. 29–31.
Murray, James A. H. 1873. The Dialect of the Southern Counties
of Scotland. London: Asher and Company.
Murray, K. M. Elisabeth. 1977. Caught in the Web of Words:
James Murray and the Oxford English Dictionary. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Peacock, Robert B. 1862. “On Some Leading Characteristics
of Northumbrian; and on the Variations in Its Grammar from That of Standard English, with Their Probable Etymological
Sources”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 81. 232–263.
Peacock, Robert Backhouse. 1869. A Glossary of the Dialect of
the Hundred of Lonsdale, North and South of the Sands, in the County of Lancaster ed.
by J. C. Atkinson. London: Asher & Co.
Pop, Sever. 1950. La
Dialectologie: Aperçu Historique et Méthodes d’Enquêtes
Linguistiques. 21 vols. Louvain: Chez l’Auteur.
Preston, Dennis R. 1982. “‘Ritin’ fowklower daun ‘rong:
Folklorists’ Failures in Phonology”. The Journal of American
Folklore 951. 304–326.
Roberts, Brinsley F. 1996. “« A gentle and amiable
prince »: Louis-Lucien Bonaparte and Welsh Studies”. Transactions of the Honourable Society of
Cymmrodorion 2 (n.s.). 79–99.
Shorrocks, Graham. 1991. “A.
J. Ellis as Dialectologist: A Reassessment”. Historiographia
Linguistica 181. 321–334.
Sommerfelt, Alf. 1962 (originally 1929). “Hugo
Schuchardt (1842–1927)”. Diachronic and Synchronic Aspects of
Language, 373–378. The Hague: Mouton.
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2016. Making
Waves: The Story of Variationist Sociolinguistics. Malden, Massachusetts: Wiley Blackwell.
Viereck, Wolfgang. 1979. “The
Dialectal Structure of British English: Lowman’s Evidence”. Hungarian Studies in
English 121. 203–231.
. 1991. “Prince
Louis-Lucien Bonaparte and English Dialectology”. Nazioarteko Dialektologia
Biltzarra ed. by Gotzon Aurrekoetxea & Xarles Videgain, 17–30. Bilbao: Real Academia de la Lengua Vasca.
West, Geoffrey. 2009. “Bonaparte,
Louis Lucien (1813–1891)”. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography 〈[URL]〉
Williams, John Ellis Caerwyn. 1959. “Bonaparte, Prince
Louis-Lucien (1813–1891)”. Dictionary of Welsh Biography. [URL]