The flower of the throat: Cultural metaphorical embodiment in the Zo’é language

This article analyses metaphorical and metonymic expressions in the Zo’é language, with an emphasis on constructions related to parts of the human body. Examples of lexicalized metaphors and metonymies are examined, considering their morphological and morphosyntactic formation, as well as their respective pragmatic uses. The theoretical framework is grounded in the cultural dimensions of the metaphorical embodiment process (; ; ; ; ). The study seeks to contribute with the Zo’é data to the question which metaphors, or which aspects of metaphorical knowledge emerge from the interaction between a common body schema and a shared physical world, and which arise from culturally specific bodily experiences, carried out in a particular natural and social environment. The research corpus was compiled from the Linguistic Support Manual for Health Care Services for the Zo’é People () and the Manual of Semiological Questions in the Zo’é Language (Cabral & Sompré, in preparation). These data enabled the identification of metaphorical and metonymic patterns and mechanisms through which speakers of the Zo’é language name and conceptualize human body parts, thereby revealing the underlying conceptual mapping patterns involved.

Keywords: Zo’é language, Tupí-Guaraní family, metaphor, metonymy, body parts

Article outline

1.Introduction
- 1.1Some notes on the Zo’é and their language
- 1.2Typological characteristics of Zo’é
- 1.3Methodology
2.Cultural metaphorical embodiment
- 2.1The human body as an object of metaphorical conceptualization in the Zo’é language
- 2.2The human body as a source domain for conceptualization processes in the Zo’é language
3.Conclusion
Notes
Abbreviations
References

References (31)

References

Brenzinger, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I. (Eds.). (2014). The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. Brill.

Cabral, A. S. A. C. (1996a). Algumas evidências lingüísticas de parentesco genético do Jo’é com as línguas Tupí-Guaraní. Moara, (4), 47–76.

(1996b). Notas sobre a fonologia segmental do Jo’é. Moara, (4), 23–46.

(1998). A propósito das oclusivas sonoras em Jo’é. Moara, (10), 53–71.

(2000). Fonologia da língua Jo’é. Universa, 50–60.

(2001). Flexão relacional na família Tupí-Guaraní. Boletim da ABRALIN, 25, 233–262.

(2007). As categorias nome e verbo em Zo’é. In A. S. A. C. Cabral & A. D. Rodrigues (Eds.), Línguas e culturas Tupí (Vol. I, pp. 241–257). LALLI.

(2013). Uma escrita para a língua Zo’é. Laboratório de Línguas Indígenas.

(2023). Quando a ordem dos constituintes em Zo’é é pragmaticamente motivada. In É. A. Fragoso, Q. F. Camargos, & S. da S. Facundes (Eds.), Conhecimento, ensino e política de línguas na Amazônia (pp. 25–53). Pontes.

Cabral, A. S. A. C., Jennings, E., & Pinto, S. B. (2019). Manual linguístico de apoio ao atendimento de saúde junto ao povo Zo’é. LALLI.

Cravens, T. D. (1982). The origin of “testa” as “head” in Romance. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 83(1), 53–60.

Dixon, R. M. W. (2011). The languages of Australia. Cambridge University Press.

Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley].

Haarmann, H. (1986). Language in ethnicity: A view of basic ecological relations. Mouton de Gruyter.

Heine, B. (2014). The body in language: Observations from grammaticalization. In M. Brenzinger & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment (pp. 13–32). Brill.

Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.

Hock, H. H. (1991). Principles of historical linguistics. Mouton de Gruyter.

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.

(2013). The Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88.

Kluge, F. (1883/2002). Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (E. Seebold, Ed.; 24th ed.). De Gruyter. (Original work published 1883).

Kraska-Szlenk, I. (2014). Semantics of body part terms: General trends and a case study of Swahili. LINCOM Europa.

(Ed.). (2020). Body part terms in conceptualization and language usage. John Benjamins.

Maalej, Z. A., & Yu, N. (Eds.). (2011). Embodiment via body parts: Studies from various languages and cultures. John Benjamins.

Pasch, H. (2020). Body-part terms as a linguistic topic and the relevance of body-parts as tools. In I. Kraska-Szlenk (Ed.), Body part terms in conceptualization and language usage (pp. 52–75). John Benjamins.

Peña-Cervel, M. S., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2022). Figurative thought and language. John Benjamins.

Rodrigues, A. D. (2010). Estrutura da língua Tupinambá. In A. S. A. C. Cabral, A. D. Rodrigues, & F. B. Duarte (Eds.), Línguas e culturas Tupí II (pp. 11–42). LALLI/Universidade de Brasília. (Original work published 1981).

Rodrigues, A. D., & Cabral, A. S. A. C. (2002). Revendo a classificação interna da família Tupí-Guaraní. In A. S. A. C. Cabral & A. D. Rodrigues (Eds.), Línguas indígenas brasileiras: fonologia, gramática e história (Vol. 1, pp. 327–337). EDUFPA.

Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–172). Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

Survival Brasil. (2025). Zo’é. [URL]

Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding cultures through their key words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford University Press.

Yu, N. (2009). From body to meaning in culture: Papers on cognitive semantic studies of Chinese. John Benjamins.