Cover not available

Article In: Interactional Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Multiple yeah buts and buts across turns

Turn-initial particles as resources for calibrating disagreements and turn-entry devices during L2 speaking tasks

ORCiD logo with link | WU — Vienna University of Economics and Business | Masaryk University
 | University of Jyväskylä
 | University of Jyväskylä
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This study illustrates how L2 speakers use the turn-initial particles yeah but and but as resources to calibrate task answers and as turn-entry devices in accomplishing collaborative argumentation during task-based peer interaction in EFL classrooms in Czechia and Finland. By showing how these particles are deployed repeatedly across multiple turns by a single speaker or two or more speakers one after another, we extend previous research on turn-initial particles, which has predominantly analysed individual instances occurring in single turns. Through the multiple (yeah) buts, students express disagreement or alternative viewpoints quite directly: typically latching onto or in overlap with the current speaker’s turn, and, in many cases, also with gaze directed at the co-participant. We argue that in the episodes with multiple (yeah) buts, the students’ orientation to the preference for minimising disagreement can be overridden by their orientation to task engagement, which is closely related to the argumentative nature of the L2 classroom tasks they are doing. Our findings contribute to the existing body of research on the grammar-body interface by providing a multimodal account of the use of multiple (yeah) buts as turn-initial particles.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Grammar-body interface and turn-initial particles
    • 2.1Turn-initial particles as resources for organising interaction
    • 2.2But as a turn-initial particle
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Turn-initial (yeah) buts as resources for calibrating disagreements
    • 4.2Buts and yeah buts as turn-entry devices
  • 5.Concluding discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (40)
References
Arita, Y. (2023). Demo “but”-prefaced responses to inquiry in Japanese. Discourse Processes, 60(8), 594–611. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Salsbury, T. (2004). The organization of turns in the disagreements of L2 learners: A longitudinal perspective. In D. Boxer & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Studying speaking to inform second language learning (pp. 199–227). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilmes, J. (1991). Toward a theory of argument in conversation: The preference for disagreement. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation (pp. 462–469). Amsterdam: International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bjørge, A. K. (2012). Expressing disagreement in ELF business negotiations: Theory and practice. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 406–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choe, A. T., & Reddington, E. (2018). But-prefacing for refocusing in public questioning and answering. The Forum, 18(1), 44–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics. Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Souza, M. R. (2024). Multimodal responses to questions: turn-initial oh coordinating with raised eyebrows in video-mediated interaction. Gesprächsforschung 251, 54–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62 (1–2), 51–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helisten, M. (2017). Resumptions as multimodal achievements in conversational (story)tellings. Journal of Pragmatics, 1121, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2013). Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of Pragmatics, 571, 331–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2018). Introduction: Analyzing turn-initial particles. In J. Heritage & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Between turn and sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacknick, C. M. (2021). Multimodal participation and engagement: Social interaction in the classroom. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. D’Urso & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric (pp. 11–38). Padua: Cleup Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze direction signals response preference in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50(1), 12–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazeland, H. (2024). Ordering a series of turn-initial particles: An extreme case analysis. In M. Selting & D. Barth-Weingarten (Eds.), New perspectives in interactional linguistic research (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazeland, H., & Huiskes, M. (2001). Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction. Its use as a resumption marker. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 141–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 1451, 47–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niemi, J. (2014). Two ‘yeah but’ formats in Finnish: The prior action engaging nii mut and the disengaging joo mut utterances. Journal of Pragmatics, 601, 54–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, Y. Y. (2001). The conversational use of but. English Teaching, 56(1), 151–174.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2022). Multimodal action formats for managing preference: Chais pas ‘dunno’ plus gaze conduct in dispreferred responses to questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 1971, 81–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E. (2018). L2 Interactional Competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 555–578.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., Keevallik, L., & Li, X. (2022). Editorial: The grammar-body interface in social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). Developing ‘methods’ for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. Pekarek Doehler (Eds.), L2 Interactional Competence and development (pp. 206–243). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S., Polak-Yitzhaki, H., Li, X., Stoenica, I. M., Havlík, M., & Keevallik, L. (2021). Multimodal assemblies for prefacing a dispreferred response: A cross-linguistic analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2005). Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1(2), 193–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pillet-Shore, D. (2017). Preference Organization. In J. Nussbaum (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M. J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rönnqvist, S., & Lindström, J. (2021). Turn continuations and gesture: “And then”-prefacing in multi-party conversations. Frontiers in Communication, 61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), 1–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steensig, J., & Asmuß, B. (2005). Notes on disaligning “yes but” initiated utterances in German and Danish conversations. In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation (pp. 349–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stukenbrock, A. (2021). Multimodal gestalts and their change over time: Is routinization also grammaticalization? Frontiers in Communication, 61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2015). Managing the boundary between “yes” and “but”: Two ways of disaffiliating with German ja aber and jaber. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(1), 32–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tůma, F., Kääntä, L., & Jakonen, T. (2023). L2 grammar-for-interaction: Functions of “and”-prefaced turns in L2 students’ collaborative talk. The Modern Language Journal, 107(4), 991–1010. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, R. J. R. (2014). Managing turn entry: The design of EI-prefaced turns in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 661, 139–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue