Cover not available
Article published In:
Internet Pragmatics
Vol. 2:1 (2019) ► pp.83–111

The pragmatic use of vocatives in private one-to-one digital communication

| Birmingham City University
| The Open University

This article examines a corpus of private text messages collected in Birmingham and surrounding towns in 2015. We look specifically at pragmatic roles played by the vocatives we find in the corpus. Since text messages are sent to targeted recipients, vocatives are structurally redundant, and we review literature concerning vocatives in spoken and written data to first see what categories others have proposed for these functions. We then challenge some of these categorisations, identifying a new category of ‘focuser’ which we argue is akin to a summons in spoken language. We also examine the pragmatic value of vocatives in performing identity work for both sender and receiver. We finish by looking at gendered performance of identity as a case study in our corpus of how text producers construct themselves and others.

Keywords: vocatives, pragmatic function, text messaging, gender, identity, categorisation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Vocatives and spoken discourse
  • 3.Vocatives and digital communication
  • 4.Affordances and constraints of digital communication and the mobile phone
  • 5.Context, data and methods
    • 5.1Description of context
    • 5.2Methods
    • 5.3Data and analysis
  • 6.Findings: First names and focusing
  • 7.Findings: Position analysis
  • 8.Findings: Vocatives as resources for identity positioning
    • 8.1Performing stylised gendered identity
    • 8.2Performing femaleness
  • 9.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00024.asp
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis, and Andreas Staehr
2018 “Moving methods online: Researching digital language practices.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity, ed. by Angela Creese, and Adrian Blackledge, 118–132. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Astruc-Aguilera, Lluisa
2005 “The form and function of extra-sentential elements.” Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 21: 1–25.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi
2008 Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
1984 “Language style as audience design.” Language in Society 13(2): 145–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
boyd, danah
2001 “Sexing the Internet: Reflections on the role of identification in online communities.” Paper presented at the conference ‘Sexualities, Medias, Technologies’, University of Surrey, 21-22 June 2001. [URL] (accessed 12 December 2018).
boyd, danah, and Alice E. Marwick
2011 “I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience.” New Media & Society 13(1): 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
1995 Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Church, Karen, and Rodrigo de Oliveira
2013 “What’s up with WhatsApp?: Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ’13), 352–361. New York: ACM Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Thomas B. Carlson
1982 “Hearers and speech acts.” Language 58(2): 332–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creese, Angela, and Adrian Blackledge
2010 “Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching?” The Modern Language Journal 941: 103–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danesi, Marcel
2017 The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Darics, Erika
2013 “Non-verbal signalling in digital discourse: the case of letter repetition.” Discourse, Context and Media 2(3): 141–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “The blurring boundaries between synchronicity and asynchronicity: New communicative situations in work-related instant messaging.” International Journal of Business Communication 51(4): 337–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré
1990 “Positioning: The discursive production of selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20(1): 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penny
1995 “Gender and sociolinguistic variation.” In Language and Gender: A Reader, ed. by Jennifer Coates, 64–77. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frobenius, Maximiliane
2014 “Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers.” Journal of Pragmatics 721: 59–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
1997 “Self-presentation and interactional alliances in e-mail discourse: the style and code-switches of Greek messages.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(2): 141–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillies, William
1993 “Scottish Gaelic.” In The Celtic Languages, ed. by Martin Ball, 230–304. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1975 “Replies and responses.” Language in Society 51: 257–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunraj, Danielle N., April M. Drumm-Hewitt, Erica M. Dashow, Sri Siddhi N. Updadhyay, and Ceila M. Kin
2016 “Texting insincerely: The role of the period in text messaging.” Computers in Human Behavior 55(B): 1067–1075. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Lila
2005 Serbian: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Luk Van Langenhove
(eds.) 1999 Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan E.
2007 “A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse.” Language@Internet 41, article 1. [URL] (accessed 5 April 2017).
Hill, Jane
1995 “Mock Spanish: A site for the indexical reproduction of racism in American English.” Language and Culture: Symposium 21. [URL] (accessed 5 April 2017).
1998 “Language, race, and white public space.” American Anthropologist 100(3): 680–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2008 Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity Through Workplace Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hultgren, Anna Kristina
2017 “Vocatives as rationalized politeness: Theoretical insights from emerging norms in call centre service calls.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(1): 90–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, Mizuko, and Daisuke Okabe
2005 “Technosocial situations: Emergent structurings of mobile email use.” In Personal, Portable, Intimate: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life, ed. by Mizuko Ito, Daisuke Okabe, and Misa Matsuda, 257–276. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Dariusz Galasiñski
2000 “Vocative address forms and ideological legitimazation in political debates.” Discourse Studies 2(1): 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, James E., and Mark Aakhus
2002 Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott
2004 “Dude.” American Speech 79(3): 281–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laursen, Ditte
2005 “Please reply! The replying norm in adolescent SMS communication.” In The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS, ed. by Richard Harper, Leysia Palen, and Alex Taylor, 53–73. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa, Samu Kytölä, Henna Jousmäki, Saija Peuronen, and Elina Westinen
2014 “Entextualisation and resemiotization as resources for identification in social media.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 112–138. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa, Elina Westinen, and Samu Kytölä
(eds.) 2017 Social Media Discourse, (Dis)identifications and Diversities. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1999 “The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation.” In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, ed. by Hilde Hasselgård, and Signe Oksefjell, 107–120. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Littlemore, Jeannette, and Caroline Tagg
2018 “Metonymy and text-messaging: A framework for understanding creative uses of metonymy.” Applied Linguistics 39(4): 481–507.Google Scholar
Lyons, Agnieszka
2014 “Self-Presentation and self-positioning in text-messages: Embedded multimodality, deixis, and reference frame.” Unpublished PhD thesis, Queen Mary University of London.Google Scholar
Madianou, Mirca, and Daniel Miller
2012 Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
McAdam, Noel
2014 “Gregory Campbell banned in absentia over ‘curry my yoghurt’ Irish language stunt.” Belfast Evening Telegraph 5 November 2014 [URL] (accessed 5 April 2017).
Madsen, Lian Malai
2013 “High and low in urban Danish speech styles.” Language in Society 42(2): 115–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd
2014 “Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media.” New Media & Society 16(7): 1051–1067. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Michael, and Anne O’ Keeffe
2003 “What’s in a Name? – Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls.” In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, ed. by Pepi Leistyna, and Charles Meyer, 153–185. Amsterdan: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Brona, and Fiona Farr
2012 “ ‘I’m fine girl, and how are you?’: The use of vocatives in spoken Irish English.” In New Perspectives on Irish English, ed. by Bettina Migge, and Maíre Ní Chiosáin, 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Rahilly, Tomás
1921 “The vocative in Modern Irish.” Ériu 91: 85–91.Google Scholar
Rainie, Lee, and Barry Wellman
2012 Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rettie, Ruth
2007 “Texters not talkers: Phone call aversion among mobile phone users.” PsychNology Journal 5(1): 33–57.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel Schegloff
1973 “Opening up closings.” Semiotica 81: 289–327.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1993 “Telephone conversation.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by R. E. Asher, and J. M. Y. Simpson, 4547–4549. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
2002 “Beginnings in the telephone.” In Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance ed. by James Katz, and Mark Aarhus, 284–300. Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skovholt, Karianne
2015 “Doing leadership in a virtual team: analysing addressing devices, requests, and emoticons in a leader’s e-mail messages.” In Digital Business Discourse ed. by Erika Darics, 101–121. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline
2012 The Discourse of Text Messaging. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline, and Esther Asprey
2017 “Messaging in the Midlands: Exploring digital literacy repertoires in a superdiverse region.” IRiS Working Paper Series 161. [URL] (accessed 8 September 2017).
Tagg, Caroline, and Philip Seargeant
2014 “Audience design and language choice in the construction and maintenance of translocal communities on social network sites.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet, ed. by Philip Seargeant, and Caroline Tagg, 161–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
2007 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin, and Alex Brown
2003 “Generation Txt? Exposing the sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging.” Discourse Analysis Online 1(1). [URL] (accessed 8 September 2017).
Wollaston, Sam
2017 “How to send GIFs to your friends and groups on WhatsApp.” Wired 25 March 2017 [URL] (accessed 18 September 2017).
Zappavigna, Michele
2012 Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
2023. A syntactic and pragmatic study of nominal vocatives in the Twitter exchanges of rappers’ fans. Journal of Pragmatics 207 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
ÖZER, Nuriye & Pınar İBE AKCAN
2022. A Pragmatic Function-Position Analysis of Address Terms: Tendencies in Turkish. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 8:2 ► pp. 456 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.