Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics: Online-First Articles
Offers in the Old Saxon Hêliand
Illocutionary force, recipient agency and speech representation
Published online: 11 May 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.25013.con
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.25013.con
Abstract
This study examines offers in the Hêliand, an Old Saxon gospel harmony, using a combined
form-to-function and function-to-form approach. Offers are also classified according to speech representation mode and role
configuration to assess how recipient agency and illocutionary force are shaped in discourse. A key finding is that offers appear
both in Direct Speech (ds) and in Narrative Representation of Speech Acts (nrsa), showing how the poem exploits
different representational strategies to frame this speech act. In ds, offers generally retain their performative force
and remain negotiable, even without real-time interaction, though some hybrid cases reduce this immediacy. In nrsa, by
contrast, negotiability is reduced, with some instances highlighting deliberate refusal whilst others present acceptance or
rejection as fixed outcomes. Within the Hêliand itself, this attenuates their interactive quality, yet in
comparison with the Diatessaron the same framing often sharpens volitional elements and foregrounds recipient
responsibility more explicitly than its source. By representing religious devotion as an exchange requiring active acceptance, the
Hêliand adapts not only the lexicon but also pragmatic framing, making offers an additional tool for aligning
Christian teaching with Saxon cultural models of lordship-based exchange of service and reward.
Keywords: historical pragmatics, offers, Old Saxon, speech acts, speech representation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 2.1The speech act of offering
- 2.2Offers in historical contexts
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1The Old Saxon Poem Hêliand
- 3.2Data collection and analysis
- 3.3Limitations
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Offers in ds
- 4.2Offers in nrsa
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (61)
Ackermann, Tanja. 2022. “Bauernkomödien, Fremdsprachenlehrwerke und die Authentizitätsfrage — ein Vergleich anhand von Aufforderungen im
17. Jahrhundert” (‘Peasant Comedies, Foreign Language Textbooks, and the
Question of Authenticity: A Comparison Based on Directives in the Seventeenth
Century’). In Markus Denkler and Michael Elmentaler (eds), Bauernkomödien des 17. Jahrhunderts als sprachhistorische Quellen (‘Peasant Comedies of the Seventeenth Century as Sources for Historical
Linguistics’). Vienna, Cologne and Weimar: Böhnlau.
. 2023. “Direktive Sprechakte in frühneuzeitlichen Fremdsprachenlehrwerken: Eine datenbasierte Evaluation von
Lehrwerksdialogen als Quelle für die Historische Pragmatik” (‘Directive
Speech Acts in Early Modern Foreign Language Textbooks: A Data-Based Evaluation of Textbook Dialogues as a Source for
Historical Pragmatics’). Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und
Literatur 145 (1): 35–79.
Barron, Anne. 2003. Acquisition
in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad
Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2005. “Offering
in Ireland and England”. In Anne Barron and Klaus P. Schneider (eds), The
Pragmatics of Irish English, 147–176. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2017. “Offers
in English”. In Rachel Giora and Michael Haugh (eds), Doing
Pragmatics Interculturally: Cognitive, Philosophical, and Sociopragmatic
Perspectives, 335–352. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
. 2025. “I’ll
Get It: Payment Offers, Payment Offer Sequences and Gender on First
Dates”. Journal of
Pragmatics 2351: 4–25.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2023. Pragmatics in the History of
English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Some Universals in Language Usage. (Second
edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman. 1989. “Politeness
Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies”. Language in
Society 18 (2): 159–212.
Busse, Ulrich. 2008. “An
Inventory of Directives in Shakespeare’s King Lear”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech
Acts in the History of
English, 85–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cathey, James (ed.). 2002. Hêliand:
Text and Commentary. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
Concu, Valentina. 2023a. “‘Ih
gebiude dir, wurm!’ Directives in Old Saxon and Old High German”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 25 (1): 137–175.
. 2025. “Explicit
Performatives in Old Saxon and Old High German: A Comparative Study”. International Review of
Pragmatics 17 (1): 58–90.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Dawn Archer. 2008. “Requests
and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play-Texts,
1640–1760”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech
Acts in the History of
English, 45–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. 2008. “Two
Polite Speech Acts from a Diachronic Perspective: Aspects of the Realisation of Requesting and Undertaking Commitments in the
Nineteenth-Century Commercial Community”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech
Acts in the History of
English, 115–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Doane, Alger Nicolaus. 1991. The Saxon Genesis: An Edition of
the West Saxon Genesis B and the Old Saxon Vatican Genesis. Madison and London: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hancher, Michael. 1979. “The
Classification of Cooperative Illocutionary Acts”. Language in
Society 8 (1): 1–14.
Harrison, Perry Neil. 2025. “Healing Power and the
Disabled Body in the Old Saxon Heliand”. JEGP, Journal of English and Germanic
Philology 124 (3): 259–269. [URL].
Hauser, Albert. 1999. Grüezi und adieu: Gruss-und Umgangsformen vom 17. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart (‘Greetings and Farewells: Greetings and Etiquette from the 17th Century to the
Present’). Zürich: Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung.
Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. “The
Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. In Jucker Andrea (ed.), Pragmatics
and Beyond
Series, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jucker, Andreas. 2018. “Apologies
in the History of English: Evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English
(COHA)”. Corpus
Pragmatics 21: 375–398.
. 2020. Politeness
in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present
Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jucker, Andreas H. 2024. Speech Acts: Discursive, Multimodal,
Diachronic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jucker, Andreas H. and Joanna Kopaczyk. 2017. “Historical
(Im)politeness”. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), The
Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic
(Im)politeness, 433–459. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen (eds). 2008. Speech
Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(eds). 2020. Manners,
Norms and Transgressions in the History of English: Literary and Linguistic
Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kalmanovitch, Yshai. 2021. “A
Pragmatic Analysis of Descriptive, Depictive and Simulative Reporting Speech Acts: Empirical Evidence from a Prosodic Study on
Conversational Modern Israeli Hebrew”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1721: 119–145.
Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. “Sprache der Nähe — Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und
Sprachgeschichte” (‘Language of Immediacy — Language of Distance: Orality
and Literacy in the Tension between Linguistic Theory and Language History’). Romanistisches
Jahrbuch 36 (1): 15–43.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2000. “Explicit
Performatives in Old English: A Corpus-based Study of Directives”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 1 (2): 301–321.
. 2008. “Directives
in Old English: Beyond Politeness?” In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech
Acts in the History of
English, 27–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. “Understanding
Anglo-Saxon ‘Politeness’: Directive Constructions with ic wille / ic
wolde”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 12 (1–2): 230–254.
. 2015. “Historical
Corpus Pragmatics: Focus On Speech Acts and Texts”. In Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier and Marianne Hundt (eds), Corpora:
Pragmatics and
Discourse, 11–36. Leiden: Brill.
Lebsanft, Franz. 1999. “A
Late Medieval French Bargain Dialogue (Pathelin II), or Further Remarks on the History of Dialogue
Forms”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical
Dialogue
Analysis, 269–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lehmann, Winfred. 1956. The
Development of Germanic Verse Form. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
Lötscher, Andreas. 1981. “Zur Sprachgeschichte des Fluchens und Beschimpfens im Schweizer-Deutschen” (‘On the Linguistic History of Swearing and Insulting in Swiss German’). Zeitschrift
für Dialektologie und
Linguistik 481: 145–160.
Louviot, Élise. 2016. Direct
Speech in Beowulf and Other Old English Narrative Poems. Martlesham, UK: Boydell & Brewer.
. 2021. “Direct
Speech in Heliand and Otfrid von Weissenburg’s Evangelienbuch: A Shared Vernacular
Tradition?” Journal of Medieval
History 47 (4–5): 526–541.
Moessner, Lilo. 2010. “Directive
Speech Acts: A Cross-Generic Diachronic Study”. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 11 (2): 219–249.
O’Keeffe, Anne. 2018. “Corpus-based
Function-to-Form Approaches”. In Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider and Wolfram Bublitz (eds), Methods
in
Pragmatics, 587–618. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Osborn, Jamie Jacqueline. 2020. Politeness Theory:
Compliance and Paralinguistic Politeness Strategies. (PhD
thesis.) Tennessee: University of Tennessee.
Pérez Hernández, Lorena. 2001. “The
Directive-Commissive Continuum”. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American
Studies 231: 77–98.
Rapp, Rebecca and Sandra Reimann. 2016. “Gruoz enbieten und grüszen. Ein Beitrag zum Desiderat eines syntaktisch-semantischen mittelhochdeutschen
Verbwörterbuchs” (‘Greetings and Salutations: A Contribution to the Need for
a Syntactic-Semantic Middle High German Verb Dictionary’). In Peter Ernst and Martina Werner (eds), Linguistische Pragmatik in historischen Bezügen (‘Linguistic
Pragmatics in Historical
Contexts’), 253–271. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Rühlemann, Christoph and Karin Aijmer. 2015. “Introduction
Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations”. In Karin Aijmer and Christopher Rühlemann (eds), Corpus
Pragmatics: A
Handbook, 360–378. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A
Primer in Conversation
Analysis. (Volume 11.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Semino, Elena and Mick Short. 2004. Corpus
Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Representation in a Corpus of English Writing. New York: Routledge.
Simpson, Paul. 1989. “Politeness
Phenomena in Ionesco’s The Lesson”. In Ronald Carter, Paul Simpson and Milton Park (eds), Language,
Discourse and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Discourse
Stylistics, 170–193. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Somers, Katharina and Shannon Dubenion-Schmidt. 2014. “The
Intersection between Syntax and Meter in the Old Saxon Hêliand”. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur
älteren
Germanistik 72 (1): 83–134.
Stroebe, Klara. 1911. Altgermanische Grussformen (‘Old Germanic Forms of
Greeting’). Heidelberg: Winter.
Taavitsainen, Irma and Susan Fitzmaurice. 2007. “Historical
Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods
in Historical Pragmatics, 11–36. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 2007. “Speech
Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods
in Historical Pragmatics, 107–138. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.