Cover not available

Article In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

From pray to please

Socio-pragmatic patterns in the Old Bailey Corpus (1720–1913)

ORCiD logo with link | Universität Augsburg
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Polite uses of pray and please are investigated in the Old Bailey Corpus (1720–1913), whose extensive sociolinguistic annotation enables a sociolinguistic approach. The fully pragmaticalised marker pray declines into insignificance in the nineteenth century. Please is attested in a great variety of constructions, which are strong in the eighteenth but wane in the nineteenth centuries, whilst pragmaticalising please rises strongly in the nineteenth. Whereas pray is used within court interaction, please is exclusively quoted from outside the courtroom. Socio-linguistically, pray is preferred overall by both the higher and the lower classes, but incoming please is used more by higher-class speakers. Whilst pray is also used more frequently by both genders, particularly between 1720 and 1839, please shows a higher use by women. According to courtroom roles, lawyers and judges completely avoid please, which is only used by lay speakers.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pray and please in a linguistic and socio-historical context
  • 3.The historical courtroom as data
    • 3.1The Old Bailey court in London and its Proceedings
    • 3.2The Old Bailey corpus
  • 4.Pray and please in the Old Bailey Corpus
    • 4.1Forms and uses
    • 4.2Socio-pragmatic distributions
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (30)
References
Akimoto, Minoji. 2000. “The Grammaticalization of the Verb ‘Pray’”. In Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 67–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 1995. “On Doing as You Please”. In Andreas Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics, 275–308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borsay, Peter. 2002. “Urban Life and Culture”. In H. T. Dickinson (ed.), A Companion to Eighteenth-Century Britain, 196–208. Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Guohua. 1998. “The Degrammaticalization of Addressee-satisfaction Conditionals in Early Modern English”. In Jacek Fisiak and Marcin Krygier (eds), Advances in English Historical Linguistics, 23–32. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia, Ewa Jonsson and Merja Kytö. 2024. Intensifiers in Late Modern English: A Sociopragmatic Approach to Courtroom Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Dawn Archer. 2008. “Requests and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play Texts, 1640–1760”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 45–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emsley, Clive, Tim Hitchcock and Robert Shoemaker. 2018. “Crime, Justice and Punishment — Judges and Juries”. Old Bailey Proceedings Online. (Version 8.0.) Accessed 11 March 2023 at: [URL]
Faya Cerqueiro, Fátima María. 2007. “The Courtesy Markers Pray and Please in the Late Eighteenth Century: Evidence from the Corpus of Late Eighteenth-Century Prose”. In Maria Losada Friend (ed.), Proceedings of the 30th International AEDEAN Conference, n.p. Huelva: Servicio de Publicationes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Please in the Nineteenth Century: Origin and Position of a Courtesy Marker”. In Carlos Prado-Alonso (ed.), New Trends and Methodologies in Applied English Language Research, 25–36. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Letter-Writing Manuals and the Evolution of Requests Markers in the Eighteenth Century”. LFE: Revista de lenguas para fines específicos 17: 295–318.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewitt, Martin. 2004. “Class and the Classes”. In Chris Williams (ed.), A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Britain, 305–320. Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Tim. 2023. “A Population History of London”. Old Bailey Proceedings Online. (Version 9.0.) Accessed 2 December 2025 at: [URL]
Hitchcock, Tim, Robert Shoemaker, Clive Emsley, Sharon Howard and Jamie McLaughlin, et al. 2023. Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674–1913. (Version 9.0) See: [URL]
Huber, Magnus. 2007. “The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674–1834: Evaluating and Annotating a Corpus of 18th- and 19th-century Spoken English”. In Anneli Meurman-Solin and Arja Nurmi (eds), Annotating Variation and Change, n.p. Accessed 21 May 2023 at: [URL]
Huber, Magnus, Magnus Nissel and Karin Puga. 2016. The Old Bailey Corpus 2.0, 1720–1913. (Manual.) See: [URL]
Jucker, Andreas H. 2025. “De-Pragmaticalization: The Demise of the Courtesy Request Marker Pray in the Early Nineteenth Century”. Presentation at IprA 19. 22–27 June 2025. Brisbane.
Forthcoming. “Courtesy Request Markers in the History of English: The Long Diachrony of Pray and Please”. In Kim Ridealgh, Luis Unceta Gómez and Annick Paternoster (eds), Re(de)fining a Field: Current Perspectives on Historical (Im)politeness, from Ancient to Modern. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara. 1998. “Pragmatic Particles in Early Modern English Court Trials”. In Raimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Anglistentag 1997 Giessen (‘1997 Giessen Conference of University Teachers of English’), 47–56. Trier: wvt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Marco H. D. and Ineke Maas. 2011. HISCLASS: A Historical International Social Class Scheme. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1979. “Activity Types and Language”. Linguistics 17 (5–6): 365–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula and Jane Demmen. 2013. “Pray in Early Modern English Drama”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14 (2): 263–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
oed = Oxford English Dictionary Online. See: [URL]
Schwarz, L. D. 1992. London in the Age of Industrialisation: Entrepreneurs, Labour Force and Living Conditions, 1700–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid and Fatima María Faya Cerqueiro. 2007. “Saying Please in Late Modern English”. In Javier Pérez Guerra (ed.), Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed, 421–444. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth and Richard Dasher. 2005. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue