Article In: Language, Culture and Society: Online-First Articles
Engineering the decolonial voice
Infrastructural audibility and Taigi dubbing in Taiwan
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This article develops the concept of infrastructural audibility to theorize the conditions under which marginalized linguistic forms become audible to institutions — recognizable, reproducible, and capable of circulating within structured domains calibrated for dominant languages. Drawing on longitudinal ethnographic fieldwork in Taiwan’s Taigi (Taiwanese) dubbing industry, I trace how practitioners pursuing an explicitly decolonial revitalization project reproduce, through the material practices of recording, the very standardizing hierarchies they are mobilized against. Analysis of correction sequences, the consolidation of linguistic authority in the language specialist (láosu), and practitioners’ accounts of what professional elevation requires demonstrates that decolonial linguistic projects seeking broadcast reach do not escape standardization; they mobilize it strategically as a condition of infrastructural audibility. The result is not a dismantling of anonymous linguistic authority but its multiplication: alongside the Mandarin broadcast norm, a nascent Taigi broadcast register is being engineered through the same infrastructural logic that constituted Mandarin’s authority. Achieving audibility within an inherited apparatus is never simply a matter of being heard; it is a matter of being rendered compatible with norms whose genealogy is colonial, and the cost of that compatibility is borne, unevenly, by the language and the speakers working to keep it alive.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Dubbing, decolonization, and the politics of sound in Taiwan
- 2.Taigi and the stratification of linguistic value
- 3.Theoretical framework: Standardization, colonial infrastructure, and heritage language
- 4.Fieldwork in Taiwan’s dubbing industry
- 5.Analysis: Correction, authority, and the production of broadcast taigi
- 6.Conclusion: Decolonization and its infrastructure
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (44)
Abdi, K. (2011). “She really only speaks English”: Positioning, language ideology, and heritage language learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(2), 161–189.
Alim, H. S., Rickford, J. R., and Ball, A. F. (Eds.). (2016). Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race. New York: Oxford University Press.
Babcock, J. (2022). Postracial policing, ‘Mother Tongue’ sourcing, and images of Singlish standard. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 32(2), 326–344.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J. B. Thompson, Ed.). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Reconstructing heritage language: Resolving dilemmas in language maintenance for Sri Lankan Tamil migrants. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 222, 131–155.
Chang, S.-Y., and Her, O.-S. (2026). Simultaneous promotion of bilingualism and multilingualism? Unpacking conflicting orientations of language as problem, right, and resource in Taiwan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 47(6): 3996–4011.
Charity Hudley, A. H., Mallinson, C., and Bucholtz, M. (Eds.). (2024). Decolonizing linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Chen, S. (2022). From Mandarin monopoly to Sinitic polypoly: The story of dubbing peiyin in postwar Taiwan. International Journal of Taiwan Studies, 5(2): 308–331.
(2025). Engineering the “perfect” dubbing lines through recording and editing. Applied Linguistics, 46(5): 791–809.
Chen, W.-C., and Wen, Y.-W. (2010). Does language matter? Ethnicity, linguistic capital and occupational attainment in Taiwan. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 44, 1–54.
Cheng, L.-W. (1977). Taiwan Fujianhua de yuyin jiegou ji biaoyinfa [Phonetic structure and phonetic transcription of Fujian dialect of Taiwan]. Taipei: Student Book.
Chun, A. (2017). Forget Chineseness: On the geopolitics of cultural identification. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Gal, S. (2017). Visions and revisions of minority languages. In P. Lane, J. Costa, and H. De Korne (Eds.), Standardizing minority languages: Competing ideologies of authority and authenticity in the global periphery (pp. 222–242). New York: Routledge.
(2025). Erasures of perspective: Authorizing the “voice from nowhere” in everyday life. Anthropological Quarterly, 98(4), 661–690.
Gal, S., and Irvine, J. T. (2019). Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gates, H. (1981). Ethnicity and social class. In E. M. Ahern and H. Gates (Eds.), The anthropology of Taiwanese society (pp. 241–281). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guardado, M. (2014). The discourses of heritage language development: Engaging ideologies in Canadian Hispanic communities. Heritage Language Journal, 11(1), 1–28.
Hsiau, A.-C. (1997). Language ideology in Taiwan: The KMT’s language policy, the Tai-yd language movement, and ethnic politics. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18, 302–315.
(2012). Chonggou Taiwan: Dangdai minzuzhuyi de wenhua zhengzhi [Reconstructing Taiwan: The cultural politics of modern nationalism]. Linking Publishing.
Irvine, J. (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 16(2), 248–267.
Jan, O. (2017). The myth of “standard national language”? Phonetic and sociolinguistic analyses on dubbing performance in Taiwan (Unpublished master’s thesis). Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jeon, M. (2008). Korean heritage language maintenance and language ideology. Heritage Language Journal, 6(2), 206–223.
Kubler, C. (1985). The Development of Mandarin in Taiwan: A Case Study of Language Contact. Taipei: Student Book.
LaDousa, C., Davis, C., and Choksi, N. (2022). Postcolonial language ideologies: Indian students reflect on mother tongue and English. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 32(3): 607–628.
Lin, S. (2009). How listening is silenced: A monolingual Taiwanese elder constructs identity through television viewing. Language in Society, 38, 311–337.
Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–555.
Ministry of Culture. (2019). Guojia yuyan fazhan fa [National Languages Development Act]. [URL]
O’Rourke, B., and Ramallo, F. (2013). Competing ideologies of linguistic authority amongst new speakers in contemporary Galicia. Language in Society, 42(3), 287–305.
Ritts, E. (2026). When is a wrong answer right?: Mediating Indigenous language revitalization at Taiwan indigenous television. American Anthropologist. Advance online publication.
Sanchez, A. (2023). Kill your ancestors: The wars of decolonization. American Ethnologist, 50(3), 439–445.
Sandel, T. (2003). Linguistic capital in Taiwan: The KMT’s Mandarin language policy and its perceived impact on language practices of bilingual Mandarin and Tai-gi speakers. Language in Society, 32, 523–551.
Shih, S.-M. (2007). Visuality and Identity: Sinophone Articulations Across the Pacific. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Sugano, A. (2012). Taiwan no gengo to moji: Kokugo, hōgen, and moji kakaku [The language and characters of Taiwan: The national language, dialects, and character renovation]. Tokyo: Keisōshobō.
Tan, K. T. (2022). The rise and fall of Taiwanese TV show: The change of TV language policy (1959–1976). Taiwan Wen Hsien, 73(2), 181–236.
Thurlow, C. (Ed.). (2020). The Business of Words: Wordsmiths, Linguists, and Other Language Workers. New York: Routledge.