Article In: Language and Dialogue: Online-First Articles
Situating dialogue and ethics
Why it Matters
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Dialogue is important, especially when considering how our words and actions impact others. This essay situates
the importance of dialogue and ethics in the pragmatics of human relationships and engagements through 1994. “Existential Homelessness: A
Contemporary Case for Dialogue.” In The Reach of Dialogue:
Confirmation, Voice, and Community, ed. by Rob Anderson, Kenneth Cissna, and Ronald C. Arnett, 229–246. NY: Hampton Press. warning about existential homelessness, Das, Saitya Brata. 2025. “The Mystery of
Dialogue.” The Journal of Dialogic
Ethics 4(2): 108–115. aesthetic understanding of the mystery of dialogue, and Michael Mitias, Michael H. 2023. Human
Dialogue. NY: Peter Lang. formal conditions for the possibility of dialogue. The essay then moves to a discussion
that lays out one way to prepare for ethical dialogic interconnections with others advocated by Arnett, Das, and Mitias, through
an active practice of leisure (Holba, Annette M. 2007. Philosophical Leisure: Recuperative
Praxis for Human Communication. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.; 2013. Transformative Leisure: A Philosophy of
Communication. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.). This places dialogue and ethics transversally “betwixt and between” (Schrag, Calvin O. 1994. Philosophical Papers: Betwixt and
Between. NY: SUNY.) self and other as dialogue is the structure of pragmatics (Weigand, Edda. 2021. “Dialogue:
The Complex Whole.” Language and
Dialogue 111: 457–486. ).
Keywords: dialogic ethics, existential homelessness, leisure, pragmatics
Article outline
- 1.Dialogue matters at conceptualizing and practicing ethics
- 1.1Constructive hermeneutic approach
- 1.2Multiplicity of perspectives
- 1.3Roadmap of essay
- 2.Being without dialogue: Existential homelessness
- 2.1Moment of parenthesis
- 2.2Need for common center of shared ideas and community
- 2.3Existential homelessness: Risk to dialogue
- 2.4Existential homelessness: Detrimental to the human condition
- 3.The aesthetical and mysterious nature of dialogue
- 3.1The ecstasy of dialogue
- 3.2The “unprethinkable”
- 3.3Dialogue: Exposure to the manifestation of existence
- 4.Dialogue as the foundation of life
- 5.Ethical considerations for dialogue
- 5.1Persuasion
- 5.2Communicational criticism
- 5.3Empathetic communication
- 5.4Developing a sentiment toward ethical thinking
- 6.Preparing for dialogue: One possible way
- 6.1A leisure practice
- 6.2Differentiating leisure and recreation: Four categories
- 6.3Differentiation through contraries
- 6.3.1Craftsmen/Technicians
- 6.3.2Participants/Spectators
- 6.3.3Play/Game
- 7.Why dialogue matters
- 7.1Dialogue as a complex whole
- 7.2Aforethought requires ethicality
- 7.3Human beings are dialogical
- 8.Conclusion
- Author queries
References
References (32)
Arnett, Ronald C. 2011. “Situating a Dialogic Ethics: A
Dialogic Confession.” In The Handbook of Communication
Ethics, ed. by George Cheney, Steve May, and Debashish Munshi, 45–63. NY: Routledge.
2001. “Dialogic Civility as Pragmatic
Ethical Praxis: An Interpersonal Metaphor for the Public Domain.” Communication
Theory 11(3): 315–338.
1994. “Existential Homelessness: A
Contemporary Case for Dialogue.” In The Reach of Dialogue:
Confirmation, Voice, and Community, ed. by Rob Anderson, Kenneth Cissna, and Ronald C. Arnett, 229–246. NY: Hampton Press.
Arnett, Ronald C. and Pat Arneson. 1999. Dialogic
Civility in a Cynical Age: Community, Hope, and Interpersonal
Relationships. NY: SUNY.
Arnett, Ronald C., Fritz, Janie M. Harden, and Leeanne M. Bell. 2009. Communication
Ethics Literacy: Dialogue and
Difference. NY: Sage.
Arnett, Ronald C. and Holba, Annette M. 2012. An Overture to Philosophy of
Communication: The Carrier of Meaning. NY: Peter Lang.
Bencherki, Nicolas and Sénac, Coline. 2023. “Instrumental
Dialogue and the Ethics of Expressing Solicitude for Each Other’s Existence.” Language and
Dialogue 13(1): 3–25.
. 1997. “The
Faith of Judaism” in Israel and the World: Essays in a Time of
Crisis. NY: Syracuse University Press.
Capone, Alessandro. 2010. Perspectives
on language use and pragmatics: A volume in memory of Sorin
Stati. München: Lincom.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984
and 1987. The Theory of Communicative
Action. Vols 1/21. Boston: Beacon Press.
Haney, Mitchell R. 2010. “The Value of
Slow.” In The Value of Time and Leisure in a World of
Work, ed. by Mitchell R. Haney and A. David Kline, 151–164. Lanaham, MD: Lexington Books.
Holba, Annette M. 2007. Philosophical Leisure: Recuperative
Praxis for Human Communication. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
2013. Transformative Leisure: A Philosophy of
Communication. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1946. “Either/Or:
A Fragment of Life.” In A Kierkegaard
Anthology, ed. by Robert Bretall, 19–108. Princeton University Press.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After
Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Neher, William W. and Paul J. Sandin. 2007. Communicating
Ethically: Character, Duties, Consequences, and
Relationships. Boston: Pearson.
Sell, Roger D. 2011. “Dialogicality and Ethics: Four
Cases of Literary Address.” Language and
Dialogue 1(1): 79–104.
Ting-Toomey, Stella. 1985. “Toward
a Theory of Conflict and Culture.” In Communication, Culture, and
Organizational Processes, ed. by William B. Gudykunst, Leah B. Stewart, and Stella Ting-Toomey, 71–86. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Weigand, Edda. 2021. “Dialogue:
The Complex Whole.” Language and
Dialogue 111: 457–486.
. 2015. “Identity
as a Dialogical Concept.” Language and
Dialogue 5(1): 17–22.