Cover not available

Article In: Comparing Constructions in Romance and Germanic Languages
Edited by Carmen Mellado Blanco and Pedro Ivorra Ordines
[Languages in Contrast 26:2] 2026
► pp. 315–342

Manner object constructions of satellite-framed languages with Spanish physiological verbs

ORCiD logo with link | University of Huelva, Spain
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Despite their unergative status, the Spanish verbs that express physiological processes are said to enter two transitive structures in which they are complemented by a direct object that is either the actor (Golpearon con sus puños hasta sangrarlos sobre la puerta ‘They punched with their fists until they bled on the door’) or the product (Murió vomitando sangre ‘He died vomiting blood’) involved in the process described in the sentence. The English-Spanish contrastive, corpus-based analysis, carried out on 10 Spanish physiological verbs, which underlies the present piece of research, reveals, however, that their transitivity potential is higher than originally expected, due to their participation in four other transitive structures different from the two ones previously illustrated. This finding suggests, furthermore, a clear crosslinguistic relationship between Talmy’s (Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed), 57–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics II. Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) well-known linguistic typologies, since three of these patterns are prototypical constructions of satellite-framed languages; namely, resultatives (José Luis había sudado hasta la sobriedad ‘José Luis had sweated until he was sober’), reaction object constructions (Cuatro hombres sudan despiertos su deseperanza ‘Four men lie awake, sweating out their despair’), and the Spanish equivalent of the English Away construction (Ahí seguirá Antonio, roncando la borrachera en el sofa ‘There Antonio will still be, snoring off his drunkenness on the couch’).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies on verbs denoting physiological processes
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Findings and discussion
    • 4.1Satellite-framed constructions
      • 4.1.1ROCs
      • 4.1.2Away-Cs
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
References (93)
References
ADESSE. 2002–2024. Base de datos de Verbos, Alternancias de Diátesis y Esquemas Sintáctico-Semánticos del Español. Vigo: University of Vigo. Available at [URL] [last accessed 1 March 2025].
Alarcos Llorach, E. 1968. Estudios de gramática funcional. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, K. and Burridge, K. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Armstrong, G. Warren. 2011. Two classes of transitive verbs: Evidence from Spanish. PhD Thesis, University of Washington.
Aske, J. 1989. Path Predicates in English and Spanish: a Closer Look. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 151: 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bary, C. and de Swart, P. 2005. Additional accusatives in Latin and Ancient Greek: Arguments against arguments. Proceedings of the Ninth ESSLLI Student Session: 12–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassols de Climent, M. 1945. Sintaxis histórica de la lengua latina. Barcelona: CSIC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beavers, J., Levin, B. and Tham, S. W. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(3): 331–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C. 2010. Comparing constructions across languages. In Contrastive Studies on Construction Grammar, H. C. Boas (ed), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C. and Sag, I. A. (eds). 2012. Sign-based construction grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouso, T. 2021. Changes in Argument Structure. The Transitivizing Reaction Object Construction. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouso, T. and Hundt, M. 2024. They Worked Their Hardest on the Construction’s History: Superlative Objoid Constructions in Late Modern American English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20(1): 91–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cano Aguilar, R. 1981. Estructuras sintácticas transitivas en el español actual. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976. The Syntax of Causative Constructions: Cross-Language Similarities and Divergences. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions, M. Shibatani (ed), 261–312. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “Radical Construction Grammar”. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds), 211–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W. B., Sotirova, V. and Taoka, C. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar, H. Boas (ed), 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. 2001. Corpus del Español: Genre/Historical. Available at [URL] [last accessed 1 July-31 August 2025].
2016. Corpus del Español: Web/Dialects. Available at [URL] [last accessed: 1 July- 31 August 2025].
de Swart, P. F. 2007. Cross-Linguistic Variation in Object Marking. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1991. A New Approach to English Grammar, On Semantic Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds). 2000. Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela B. and Sánchez, J. 1990. Semántica de prototipos: El campo semántico de los verbos que expresan la manera de hablar frente al de los verbos de sonido en inglés y español. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 61: 19–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C. 1990. English Verbs as a Semantic Net. International Journal of Lexicography 31: 278–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felser, C. and Wanner, A. 2001. The Syntax of Cognate and Other Unselected Objects. In Structural Aspects of Semantically Complex Verbs, N. Dehé and A. Wanner (eds), 105–130. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filipović, L. 2007. Talking about motion: A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. (Studies in Language Companion Series 91). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 2013. Berkeley Construction Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, T. Hoffmann and G. Trousdale (eds), 111–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Explain Me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Romero, L. 2022. Sobre la expresión del movimiento en el español actual: la construcción de CAMINO. In La interfaz Léxico-Gramática. Contrastes entre el español y las lenguas germánicas, J. Cuartero Otal, R. Gutiérrez Pérez, Juan P. Larreta Zulategui and M. Martínez Vázquez (eds), 101–135. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. and Trousdale, G. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibáñez, S. and Melis, C. 2015. Ambivalencia transitiva y estructura argumental: resultados de un estudio de uso. Anuario de Letras, Lingüística y Filología III(2): 153–197.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Twistin’ the Night Away. Language 73(3): 534–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, M. 2010. On the Time Away Construction: A Corpus-Based Approach. Linguistic Research 27(1): 121–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J. and Lim, J. 2012. English Cognate Object Constructions: A Usage-Based Construction Grammar Approach. English Language and Linguistics 181: 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kogusuri, T. 2009. The syntax and semantics of Reaction Object Constructions. Tsukuta English Studies 281: 33–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kudrnáčová, N. 2005. Oscillatory Corporeal Verbs from a Semantico-Syntactic Perspective. Brno Studies in English 31(1): 35–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. 1973. The Logic of Politeness: or, Minding Your P’s and Q’s. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 9(1): 292–305.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G., Rayson, P., and Wilson, A. 2001. Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macfarland, T. 1995. Cognate Objects and the Argument/Adjunct Distinction in English. PhD Thesis, Northwestern University.
Martínez Vázquez, M. 1998. Effected Objects in English and Spanish. Languages in Contrast 1(2): 245–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Intralinguistic Variation in the Expression of Motion Events in English and Spanish. Lingue e Linguaggi 91: 143–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014a. Expressive Object Constructions in English. A Corpus Based Analysis. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 691: 175–190.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014b. Reaction Object Constructions in English and Spanish. ES. Revista de Filología Inglesa 351: 193–217.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. La construcción llorar las penas: un nuevo caso de tipología germánica en una lengua romance. Verba 431: 107–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massam, D. 1990. Cognate Objects as Thematic Objects. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 351: 161–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mateu Fontanals, J. 2000. Paths and Telicity in Idiomatic Constructions: a Lexical-Syntactical Approach to the Way Construction. Workshop on Paths and Telicity in Event Structure. Birmingham, Great Britain, 7–11 August 2000. The University of Birmingham Press. 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Conflation and Incorporation Processes in Resultative Constructions. In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, V. Demonte and L. McNally (eds), 252–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McClure, W. 1990. A Lexical Semantic Explanation for Unaccusative Mismatches. In Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective, K. Dziwirek, P. Farrell and E. Meijas-Bikandi (eds), 305–318. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McMillion, A. 2006. Labile Verbs in English: Their Meaning, Behavior and Structure. PhD Thesis, University of Stockholm.
McNulty, E. 1988. The Syntax of Adjunct Predicates. PhD Thesis, University of Connecticut.
Mendívil Giró, J. L. 2004. Idiomaticidad negativa y construcciones gramaticales. In Homenaje al Profesor Estanislao Ramón Trives, R. Almela Pérez, D. A. Igualada Belchi, J. M. Jiménez Cano and A. Vera Luján (eds), 519–538. Editum: Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirto, Ignazio M. 2007. Dream a little dream of me: Cognate Predicates in English. Actes du 26e Colloque International Lexique-Grammaire: 121–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittwoch, A. 1998. Cognate Objects as Reflections of Davidsonian Arguments. In Events and Grammar, S. Rothstein (ed), 309–332. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mora Gutiérrez, J. P. 1999. Directed motion in English and Spanish. PhD Thesis, University of Seville.
Naigles, L. R., Eisenberg, A. R., Kako, E. T., Highter, M. and McGraw, N. 1998. Speaking of Motion: Verb Use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes 13(5): 521–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patzelt, C. 2011. The impact of English on Spanish-language media in the USA. A qualitative analysis of newspaper articles. In Multilingual Discourse Production: Diachronic and Synchronic Perspectives, S. Kranich, V. Becher, S. Höder and J. House (eds), 257–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2023. Corpus de Referencia del Español Actual. Available at [URL] [last accessed 1 July-31 August 2025].
. 2025. Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI. Available at [URL] [last accessed 1 July-31 August 2025].
Real Puigdollers, C. 2009. The Nature of Cognate Objects: A Syntactic Approach. Proceedings of ConSOLE XVI1: 157–178.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, S. 1988. Unlike Lexical Entries. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 202–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivas, E. 1996. Construcciones de objeto interno en castellano medieval. Intento de caracterización. Revista de Filología Románica 131: 39–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Arrizabalaga, B. 2004. The Attributive System in English and Spanish: Contrasts in Expressing Change of State. Languages in Contrast 41: 223–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. The birth of a new resultative construction in Spanish: a corpus-based description. Folia Linguistica 48(1): 119–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Construcciones resultativas en español. Caracterización sintáctico-semántica. Philologica Canariensia 221: 55–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2022a. Durmiendo sueños y borracheras: Estructuras transitivas con el verbo dormir. Revista de Filología Española 102(1): 159–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2022b. La preposición hasta como marcador resultativo en el español peninsular contemporáneo. In La interfaz Léxico-Gramática. Contrastes entre el español y las lenguas germánicas, J. Cuartero Otal, R. Gutiérrez Pérez, J. Pablo Larreta Zulategui and M. Martínez Vázquez (eds), 137–165. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2025. A corpus-based study on the transitive uses of English physiological verbs. Research in Corpus Linguistics 13(2): 200–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Ramalle, Teresa Mª. 2003. Los objetos cognados como expresión de la manera verbal. Verba 301: 317–340.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1996. Two Ways to Travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish. In Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, M. Shibatani and Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 195–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, M. 1983. Verb Descriptivity in German and English. A Contrastive Study in Semantic Fields. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snyder, W. 2012. Parameter Theory and Motion Predicates. In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, V. Demonte and L. McNally (eds), 279–299. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76(4): 859–890. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed), 57–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics II. Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thalberg, I. 1972. Enigmas of Agency. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, E. 2018. The Diachrony of Verb Meaning: Aspect and Argument Structure. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Stability and Change in Intransitive Argument Structure. Open Linguistics 5(1): 217–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus T. 1963–1973. A Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: J. Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Washio, R. 1997. Resultatives, Compositionality and Language Variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 61: 1–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1997. Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue