In:Informality in Japanese: Getting close in a formal context
Edited by Haruko Minegishi Cook and Momoko Nakamura
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 357] 2027
► pp. 50–70
Chapter 3Making connections
Reported speech, repetition, eccentric metaphor, and other resources in research interview discourse
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This chapter demonstrates that even in institutional and formal contexts, participants can and do make emotional
connections with each other. In my data of two-party research interviews, I observed some recurrent linguistic elements in moments of
such connection: (1) reported speech, (2) repetition, and (3) eccentric metaphors. However, these linguistic strategies did not create
emotional connections in isolation. Rather, extralinguistic factors such as the interlocutors’ mutual familiarity as members of the
same professional networks and camaraderie based on similar professional and personal experiences, and accompanying semiotic features
such as empathetic facial expressions, smiles, and laughter helped the interview participants make stories come alive and engage the
other participant more fully. In other words, the participants successfully achieved emotional connection because they employed
multilevel and multimodal (extralinguistic, visual, paralinguistic, and linguistic) resources in a concerted manner.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Research interviews: Collaboration, institutionality, formality, and connection
- 3.Data
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Emotional connections
- 4.2External factors and non-linguistic semiotic resources
- 4.3Linguistic resources
- 4.3.1Reported speech (or constructed dialogue)
- 4.3.2Repetition
- 4.3.3Eccentric metaphor
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
- Author queries
Acknowledgements Notes References Appendix
References (28)
Alsaawi, Ali. 2014. “A
Critical Review of Qualitative Interviews.” European Journal of Business and Social
Sciences 3 (4): 149–156.
Antaki, Charles. 2009. “The
Uses of Absurdity.” In Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary
Perspectives on the Research Interview, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 85–102. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bochner, Arthur P., and Nicholas A. Riggs. 2014. “Practicing
Narrative Inquiry.” In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative
Research, ed. by Patricia Leavy, 95–222. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Connelly, F. Michael, and D. Jean Clandinin. 1990. “Stories
of Experience and Narrative Inquiry.” Educational
Researcher 19 (5): 2–14.
Cook, M. Haruko. 1996. “Japanese Language
Socialization: Indexing the Modes of Self.” Discourse
Processes 22: 171–197.
. 1998. “Situational Meaning of the
Japanese Social Deixis: The Mixed Use of the Masu and Plain Forms.” Journal of
Linguistic
Anthropology 8 (1): 87–110.
. 2011. “Are Honorifics Polite? Uses of
Referent Honorifics in a Japanese Committee Meeting.” Journal of
Pragmatics 43 (15): 3655–3672.
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. “Variation
and the Indexical Field.” Journal of
Sociolinguistics 12 (4): 453–476.
. 2016. “Variation,
Meaning and Social Change.” In Sociolinguistics: Theoretical
Debates, ed. by Nicholas Coupland, 68–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, Rosalind, and Janet Holland. 2013. What
Is Qualitative Interviewing? London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame
Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hak, Tony. 2009. “Interviewer
Laughter as an Unspecified Request for Clarification.” In Analyzing Race
Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 200–214. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese. Revised
Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1984. “On
Laughter in Pursuit of Intimacy.” Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e di Linguistica, Università
di Urbino: Working Papers and Pre-publications No. 135. [URL]
Kanno, Yasuko. 2003. Negotiating
Bilingual and Bicultural Identities: Japanese Returnees betwixt Two Worlds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kim, Jeong-Hee. 2015. Understanding
Narrative Inquiry: The Crafting and Analysis of Stories as Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mann, Steve. 2016. The
Research Interview: Reflective Practice and Reflexivity in Research
Processes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Okamoto, Shigeko, and Janet S. Shibamoto-Smith. 2016. The
Social Life of the Japanese Language: Cultural Discourse and Situated Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sarangi, Srikant. 2009. “Institutional,
Professional, and Lifeworld Frames in Interview Talk.” In Analyzing Race
Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 64–84. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Suzuki, Satoko. 2023. “Identity
Presentations of L1-Japanese Female Professors in the United States.” Journal of Language, Identity
& Education.
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. “Introducing
Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary
Narrative.” In Direct and Indirect Speech, ed.
by Florian Coulmas, 311–360. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 1987. “Repetition
in Conversation: Toward a Poetics of
Talk.” Language 63 (3): 574–605. [URL]
