Henrike Jansen
List of John Benjamins publications for which Henrike Jansen plays a role.
Journal
ISSN 2211-4742 | E-ISSN 2211-4750
Articles
2021 The presentational dimension of Geert Wilders’s populist argumentative style Argumentative Style, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 121–143 | Article
This study responds to van Eemeren’s (2019, 2021) call for research on the prototypical argumentative styles used in particular domains or communicative activity types by particular individuals or groups. It explores the argumentative style of Dutch politician Geert Wilders in presenting… read more
2020 “The people want it”: Analysis and evaluation of the populist argument in the context of deliberation Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:3, pp. 342–367 | Article
This article reflects on the reasonableness of populist arguments supporting a prescriptive standpoint in the context of deliberation (which I call ‘deliberative’ populist arguments). A literature survey shows a divide between authors who claim that populist arguments are always fallacious and… read more
2017 Frans H. van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (Eds.) (2015), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory Context-dependency of Argumentative Patterns, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 97–100 | Review
2017 The space for strategic manoeuvring in adjudicating a freedom of speech case in the Netherlands: The first trial of Geert Wilders Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2, pp. 105–136 | Article
In this article it is shown that the institutional preconditions of the activity type adjudicating a freedom of speech case leave much room for strategic manoeuvring with topical selection. To this end, an analysis is presented of the argumentation of the District Court in a case against the… read more
2017 Chapter 12. The space for strategic manoeuvring in adjudicating a freedom of speech case in the Netherlands: The first trial of Geert Wilders Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peng Wu (eds.), pp. 193–224 | Chapter
In this article it is shown that the institutional preconditions of the activity type adjudicating a freedom of speech case leave much room for strategic manoeuvring with topical selection. To this end, an analysis is presented of the argumentation of the District Court in a case against the Dutch… read more
2015 “I did not do it, because I would not do it”: Defending oneself against an accusation Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 251–264 | Article
When hard proof is absent, someone who faces an accusation can seek assistance in arguments making it plausible that (s)he ‘did not do it’. This paper deals with an argument saying that the accused would never do the alleged act because of the harmful consequences it would yield. An analysis and… read more
2011 Anecdotes and Arguments Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, Feteris, Eveline T., Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), pp. 75–88 | Article