Article In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles
All bark or all bite?
The role of cultural knowledge in the semantics of the Russian verb sobatchitsya versus the English to dog
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
The article presents a contrastive analysis of two metaphorical “animal
verbs” in English versus Russian, focusing specifically on the diverging semantics of the
English to dog ‘to follow with a malicious intent’ and its Russian
counterpart собачиться [sobachitsya, lit. ‘to dog
oneself/each other’] ‘to quarrel loudly, to rant’. Historical corpus data as well as
lexicographical data paired with semantic field analysis are employed to selectively
reconstruct the respective cultural models of dog around the attested time of N→V
conversion in each language. This reconstruction points to a link between chronologically
dominant cultural conceptualisations and the resulting differences in the lexical meanings
of both denominal verbs.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 3.Data and method
- 4.Results
- 4.1Overlap in the cultural models of dog in English and Russian
- 4.2The 16th century English cultural model of dog
- 4.3The 19th century Russian cultural model of sobaka
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
- Author queries
References
References (33)
Dictionaries and corpora
Oxford University
Press. (n.d.). Oxford English Dictionary
Online. Retrieved 30 September
2025, from [URL]
Russian National Corpus. (n.d.). Natsional’nyy korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National
Corpus]. Retrieved 8 July
2025, from [URL]
Department of Modern Languages, University of
Helsinki. (1991). The Helsinki Corpus of English
Texts. Retrieved 30 September
2025, from [URL]
Further sources
Arkhanhelska, Alla M. (2020). Sobaka kak
« necistoe » zhivotnoe v tradicionnoj narodnoj kul’ture i jazyke [The
dog as an ‘unclean’ animal in traditional folk culture and language]. Slavica
Slovaca, (1), 100–122.
Baranyiné Kóczy, Judit. (2024). A
cultural linguistic study of embodied Hungarian proverbs representing facial
hair. In S. Belkhir (Ed.), Proverbs
within Cognitive Linguistics: State of the
art (pp. 298–327). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bauer, Lauri, & Valera Hernández, Salvador (Eds). (2005). Approaches
to conversion/zero-derivation. Waxman.
Dal’, Vladimir I. (1989/1862a). Poslovicy
russkogo naroda [Proverbs of the Russian
people] (Vol. 2). Khudozhestvennaya Literatura.
(1989/1862b). Poslovicy
russkogo naroda [Proverbs of the Russian
people] (Vol. 1). Khudozhestvennaya Literatura.
Đurović, Tatjana. (2010). Beavering
away or Monkeying around: Metaphoricity of phrasal verbs related to
animals. In G. Raţă (Ed.), Teaching
foreign languages: Languages for special
purposes (pp. 330–342). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Geeraerts, Dirk. (1997). Diachronic
prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford University Press.
Ivan Krylov: Elephant and
Pug. (n.d.). Retrieved from RuVerses
website: [URL]
Karius, Ilse. (1985). Die
Ableitung der denominalen Verben mit Nullsuffigierung im Englischen. De Gruyter.
Knyazhevich, Dmitrii M. (1822). Polnoe sobranie
russkikh poslovits i pogovorok, raspolozhennoe po azbuchnom poryadku [Complete
collection of Russian proverbs and sayings, arranged in alphabetical order]. Typography of
Karl Krail, published by I. Zaikin.
Korshunkov, Vladimir A. (2024). Damy s
sobachkami: otnoshenie k sobakam v Rossii v XVIII–XIX vv. [Ladies with
little dogs: Attitudes towards dogs in the 18th- and 19th-century Russia]. Этнографическое
обозрение, (1), 115–132.
Korshunkov, Vladimir A., & Korschunkova, A. В. (2021). Pozavidovala koshka: otnoshenie k domashnim zhivotnym v Rossii v XVIII — nachale XX veka (kul’turno-istoricheskie i
zooantropologicheskie aspekty) [‘The cat envied the dog’s life’: The
attitude towards domestic animals in Russia in the 18th — early 20th centuries (cultural, historical and
zooanthropological aspects]. Вестник гуманитарного
образования, (2(22)), 139–150.
Kytö, Merja, & Rissanen, Matti. (2011). CoRD
| Helsinki Corpus (HC). Retrieved 10 July 2025, from [URL]
Manova, Stela. (2011). Understanding
morphological rules: With special emphasis on conversion and subtraction in Bulgarian, Russian and
Serbo-Croatian. Springer.
Martsa, Sándor. (2013). Conversion
in English: A cognitive Semantic Approach. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Marugina, Nadezhda I. (2009). Koncept
« Sobaka » kak element russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira [The concept ‘dog’
as an element of the Russian linguistic worldview]. Язык и
культура, 2(6), 11–30.
Menache, Sophia. (1998). Dogs
and human beings: A story of friendship. Society &
Animals, 6(1), 67–86.
Minci, Wan. (2016). Koncept « sobaka » v russkoj i kitajskoj jazykovykh kartinakh mira (na materiale poslovic i
pogovorok) [The concept dog in the Russian and Chinese linguistic
worldviews (based on proverbs and sayings)’. Вестник Псковского
ГосударственногоУниверситета, 4, 150–155.
Palmatier, Robert Allen. (1995). Speaking of animals: A
dictionary of animal metaphors. Greenwood Press.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe, & Thornburg, Linda L. (2012). Conceptualizing
humans as animals in English verb particle constructions. Language
Value, (4), 63–83.
Paton, Bernadette. (2012, August 16). The
dog: Man’s best friend? Retrieved 7
March 2022, from [URL]
Polzenhagen, Frank, Wolf, Hans-Georg, Latić, Denisa, & Peters, Arne. (2024). World
Englishes and cultural linguistics: Theory and research. World
Englishes, 43(3), 360–378.
Popova, Zinaida D., & Sternin, Iosif A. (2001). Ocherki po kognitivnoy
lingvistike [Essays in cognitive
linguistics]. Istoki.
Sharifian, Farzad. (2011). Cultural
conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. John Benjamins.
. (2017). Cultural
Linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. John Benjamins.
Wolf, Hans-Georg. (2021). Cultural
conceptualizations of magical practices related to menstrual blood in a transhistorical and transcontinental
perspective. In H.-G. Wolf, D. Latić, & A. Finzel (Eds), Cultural-linguistic
explorations into spirituality, emotionality, and
society (pp. 41–76). John Benjamins.