Cover not available

Article In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles

“This” or “that”?

The discursive-affective functions of Mandarin demonstratives in spoken and written corpora

ORCiD logo with link | National Sun Yat-sen University
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This study investigates the multifunctionality of Mandarin Chinese demonstratives, focusing on their discourse-organizing and appraisal functions in both written and spoken contexts. While demonstratives serve deictic roles for spatial and temporal reference, recent research highlights its extension into domains of discourse management and affective positioning. Drawing on online posts and conversational data, the current study analyzed the distribution of proximal zhe ‘this’ and distal na ‘that’ across three dimensions: deixis, interaction, and appraisal. Findings show that demonstratives occur more frequently in spoken than in written discourse, with distal na dominating in conversation and proximal zhe more common in written posts. Functional analysis reveals that distal na is closely linked to interactional functions such as topic management, distancing, and expansion, whereas zhe more frequently indexes epistemic stance, immediacy, and reader engagement. These results highlight the layered roles of demonstratives, and they also indicate asymmetry of functional extension with distal and proximal demonstratives in modern Mandarin.
Article outline
  • 1.Exploring the functions of Chinese demonstratives
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Between deixis and anaphora
    • 2.2Discoursive and interactional functions of deixis
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Written data: Celebrity event discourse
    • 3.2Spoken data: The NCCU Corpus of Spoken Taiwan Mandarin
    • 3.3Analytical procedure
  • 4.Demonstratives in spoken and written corpora
    • 4.1Interactional functions of demonstratives
    • 4.2The appraisal functions of demonstratives
      • 4.2.1Affects
      • 4.2.2Judgments
      • 4.2.3Appreciation and evaluation
      • 4.2.4Engagement: Contracting and expanding positions
  • 5.Discussion: Layered functions of demonstratives
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • Author queries
  • References
References (41)
References
Acton, Eric K., & Potts, Christopher. (2014). That straight talk: Sarah Palin and the sociolinguistics of demonstratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(1), 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baranyiné Kóczy, Judit, & Zajdó, Krisztina. (2023). Spatial metaphors in reporting emotions: The use of emotional deixis in interviews with parents of children with a language disorder. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 47(2), 47–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beyazid, Kamar, & Baranyiné Kóczy, Judit. (2026). The black hole fed on the star: Conceptualizing black holes through metaphor in popular science Youtube communication. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2) [this issue].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carisio, Anastasiia. (2026). Value system in the Russian concepts of VOJNA ‘war’. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2) [this issue].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ching, Yu-Ting. (2021). A Study of the discourse-pragmatic Mandarin Chinese na and nage (’that’) and pedagogical implications. [Master thesis, Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan].
Cornish, Francis. (2007). English demonstratives: discourse deixis and anaphora. A discourse-pragmatic account. In Nilsen, Randi Alice, Amfo, Nana Aba Appiah, & Borthen, Kaja (Eds.), Interpreting utterances: Pragmatics and its interfaces. Essays in honour of Thorstein Fretheim (pp. 147–166). Novus Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chui, Kawai, & Lai, Huei-ling. (2008). The NCCU Corpus of Spoken Chinese: Mandarin, Hakka, and Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 6(2), 119–144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. (2019). Proximal and distal deictics and the construal of narrative time. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(2), 399–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Mei. (2002). 指示詞這和那在北京話中的語法化 (The Grammaticalization of the demonstratives zhe ‘this’ and na ‘that’ in Beijing Mandarin). In Zhongguo Yuwen (Studies of the Chinese Language) 4: 14. DOI:CNKI:SUN.0.2002-04-010.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fossard, Marion, Garnham, Alan, & Cowles, H. Wind. (2012). Between anaphora and deixis… The resolution of the demonstrative noun phrase “that N.” Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(9), 1385–1404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galac, Ádám. (2026). Multi-perspective olfactory verbs in English, German, French, and Spanish: A corpus-based comparison of smell, riechen, sentir, and oler. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2) [this issue].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giaxoglou, Korina. (2015). “Everywhere I go, you’re going with me”: Time and space deixis as affective positioning resources in shared moments of digital mourning. Discourse, Context and Media, 9, 55–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood, & Hasan, Ruqaiya. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (1996). Demonstratives in narrative discourse: A taxonomy of universal uses. In Fox, Barbara A. (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 205–254). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. (2015). Manner deixis as source of grammatical markers in Indo-European languages. In Viti, Carlotta (Ed.), Perspectives on historical syntax (pp. 33–60). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. (1974). Remarks on “this” and “that.” Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 10, 345–356.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lam, Suet Ling, & Crosthwaite, Peter. (2018). APPRAISAL resources in L1 and L2 argumentative essays: A contrastive learner corpus-informed study of evaluative stance. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies, 1(1), 8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Relativity in spatial conception and description. In Gumperz, John J. & Stephen C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 177–202). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Deixis and demonstratives. In Wilkins, David (Ed.), Manual for the 1999 Field Season (pp. 29–40). Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Deixis. In Horn, Laurence R. & Gregory Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 97–121). Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liardét, Cassi L. (2018). “As we all know”: Examining Chinese EFL learners’ use of interpersonal grammatical metaphor in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 64–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maes, Alfons, Krahmer, Emiel, & Peeters, David. (2022). Understanding demonstrative reference in text: A new taxonomy based on a new corpus. Language and Cognition, 14(2), 185–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marmaridou, Sophia S. A. (2000). Pragmatic meaning and cognition. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter Robert Rupert White. (2005). The language of evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. (2009). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher, & Schwarz, Florian. (2010). Affective “this.” Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 3, 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, José, & Van Krieken, Kobie. (2019). Traveling through narrative time: How tense and temporal deixis guide the representation of time and viewpoint in news narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(2), 281–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stewart, Martyn. (2015). The language of praise and criticism in a student evaluation survey. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45(June 2015), 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. (1999). The grammar of demonstratives in Mandarin conversational discourse: A case study. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 27(1), 69–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teng, Shou-hsin. (1981). Deixis, anaphora, and demonstratives in Chinese. Cahiers de Linguistique — Asie Orientale, 10, 5–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1995). Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Stein, Dieter & Susan Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation (pp. 37–54). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Krieken, Kobie, & Sanders, José. (2019). Smoothly moving through Mental Spaces: Linguistic patterns of viewpoint transfer in news narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(3), 499–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Krieken, Kobie, Sanders, José, & Sweetser, Eve. (2019). Linguistic and cognitive representation of time and viewpoint in narrative discourse. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(2), 243–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven. (2004). Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(3), 489–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Ying. (2023). Turn-initial na in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 216, 144–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, Hui, & Liu, Yongbing. (2021). If it had been conducted with a larger database…: A comparison of If-constructions in Chinese L2 learners’ theses and published research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 64, 37–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue