Article In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Culture or cognition?
The evolutionary dynamics of gender assignment in the Indo-European lexicon
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Gender languages assign nouns to a category, such as masculine, feminine, neuter or common. Gender assignment is
complicated and difficult to learn, as languages do not have specific rules for assigning a noun to one or the other gender. This
study looks at gender assignment from the perspective of semantics and lexical semantic evolution, exemplified on the
Indo-European family. Gender assignment has a semantic core, in which animate nouns are more likely to be masculine, inanimate
nouns feminine and neuter, nature nouns masculine, and culture nouns feminine or neuter. To investigate how these patterns emerge,
we study the evolutionary dynamics of these semantic properties on a gender-coded lexical data set for Indo-European. We find that
masculine is a stable gender that remains in its semantic category and does not change. Feminine is also a stable category which
may get lost or transfer to masculine. Neuter and common are unstable categories, which continuously alter or get lost in gender
assignment. In sum, our result shows that the semantic core of gender — affected both by cognitive and cultural factors — remains
stable and does not vacillate in evolution.
Keywords: gender, semantic assignment, lexical evolution, phylogenetics
Article outline
- 1.Background, theory, and model
- 2.Research questions and hypotheses
- 3.Data
- 4.Method
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
- Author queries
References
References (53)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun
categorization devices. Oxford University Press.
(2019). Noun categorization devices: A
cross-linguistic perspective. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Elena I. Mihas (Eds.), Genders
and classifiers. Oxford University Press.
Allassonnière-Tang, Marc, & Dunn, Michael. (2020). The
evolutionary trends of grammatical gender in Indo-Aryan languages. Language Dynamics and
Change, 11(2), 211–240.
Allassonnière-Tang, Marc, Lundgren, Olof, Robbers, Maja, Cronhamn, Sandra, Larsson, Filip, Her, One-Soon, Hammarström, Harald, & Carling, Gerd. (2021). Expansion
by migration and diffusion by contact is a source to the global diversity of linguistic nominal categorization
systems. Nature Humanities & Social Science —
Communications, 8, Article 331.
Anderson, Cormac, Matthew Scarborough, Lechosław Jocz, Martin Joachim Kümmel, Thomas Jügel, Britta Irslinger, Roland Pooth, Henrik Liljegren, Richard F. Strand, Geoffrey Haig, Ulrich Geupel, Martin Macak, Ronald I. Kim, Erik Anonby, Tijmen Pronk, Oleg Belyaev, Tonya Kim Dewey-Findell, Matthew Boutilier, Cassandra Freiberg, Robert Tegethoff, Matilde Serangeli, Krzysztof Stroński, Alexander Falileyev, Nikos Liosis, Kim Schulte, Ganesh Kumar Gupta, Raheleh Izadifar, Patrycja Markus, Nicholas Williams, Simone Loi, Nicholas Sims-Williams, Martin Findell, Shirin Adibifar, Giovanni Abete, Petar Atanasov, Esther Baiwir, Maria-Reina Bastardas, Adam Benkato, Lisa Shugert Bevevino, Éva Buchi, Giorgio Cadorini, Chundra Cathcart, Loïc Cheveau, Charalambos Christodoulou, Jérémie Delorme, Steven N. Dworkin, Deniz Ekici, Shervin Farridnejad, Mojtaba Gheitasi, Harald Hammarström, Steve Hewitt, Afsar Ali Khan, Muhammad Kamal Khan, Liudmila Khokhlova, Deborah Kim, Christopher Lewin, Borana Lushaj, Parvin Mahmoudveysi, Masoud Mahommadirad, Sam Mersch, Baydaa Mustafa, Fatemeh Nemati, Maryam Nourzaei, Peadar Ó Muircheartaigh, Virginia Oogjen, Muhammed Ourang, Heather Pagan, Timothy S. Palmer, Steve Pepper, Mandar Purandare, Khwaja Rehman, Guto Rhys, Unn Røyneland, Muhammad Zaman Sagar, Jade Jørgen Sandstedt, Lars Steensland, Mortaza Taheri-Ardali, Mahnaz Talebi-Dastenaei, Sabine Tittel, Tiago Tresoldi, Michiel de Vaan, Annemarie Verkerk, Arjen Versloot, Paul Videsott, Nikola Vuletić, Manuel Widmer, Arash Zeini, Hans-Jörg Bibiko, Fiona Runge, Russell D. Gray, & Paul Heggarty. (2025). The
Indo-European Cognate Relationships dataset. Scientific
Data, 12(1), Article
1541.
Baranyiné Kóczy, Judit, & Abdramanova, Saule. (2026). Cultural
conceptualizations of HORSE phraseology: A comparative analysis of Hungarian and Kazakh. Review
of Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2) [this
issue].
Bouckaert, Remco, Redding, David, Sheehan, Oliver, Gray, Russell, Jones, Kate E., & Atkinson, Quentin. (2022). Global
language diversification is linked to socio-ecology and threat
status. SocArxiv.
Brown, Dunstan, Chumakina, Marina, & Corbett, G. Greville. (Eds.). (2012). Canonical
morphology and syntax. Oxford University Press.
Brown, Dunstan, Corbett, G. Greville, Fedden, Sebastian, Hippisley, Andrew, & Marriott, Paul. (2013). Grammatical
typology and frequency analysis: number availability and number use. Journal of Language
Modelling, 1(2), 227–241.
Carling, Gerd. (2019). Mouton
atlas of languages and cultures: Vol. 1. Europe and West, Central and South Asia. Berlin — Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
. (Ed.). (2024). DiACL. Diachronic
Atlas of Comparative Linguistics Online. Goethe University Frankfurt.
Carling, Gerd, & Cathcart, Chundra. (2021a). Evolutionary
dynamics of Indo-Eurpean alignment patterns. Diachronica.
Carling, Gerd, Cronhamn, Sandra, Farren, Robert, Aliyev, Elnur, & Frid, Johan. (2019). The
causality of borrowing: Lexical loans in Eurasian languages. PLOS ONE.
Carling, Gerd, Cronhamn, S., Lundgren, Olof, Bogren Svensson, Victor, & Frid, Johan. (2023). The
evolution of lexical semantics: Dynamics, directionality, and drift. Frontiers in
Communication, 8.
Carling, Gerd, Efrat-Kowalsky, Nour, Erben-Johansson, Niklas, Jäger, Gerhard, Michael, Lev, Allassonnière-Tang, Marc, & Larsson, Filip. (n.d.). Linguistic
Gender emerges as a Sex Distinction on Pronouns. Manuscript submitted for publication.
. (2013). Gender
typology. In G. G. Corbett (Ed.), The
expression of
gender, (pp. 87–130). De Gruyter Mouton.
Dahl, Östen. (2000a). Animacy
and the notion of semantic gender. In B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen, T. Nevalainen, & M. Saari (Eds.), Gender
in grammar and
cognition (pp. 99–115). De Gruyter Mouton.
. (2000b). Elementary
gender distinctions. In B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen, T. Nevalainen, & M. Saari (Eds.), Gender
in grammar and
cognition (pp. 577–593). De Gruyter Mouton.
Di Garbo, Francesca, Rahabi, Lyne, & Verkerk, Annemarie. (2025). Animacy-based
nominal classification in northwestern Bantu and beyond. In Areas,
families, and pools aplenty: A Festschrift for Tom Güldemann. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Efrat-Kowalsky, Nour, Larsson, Filip, Erben-Johansson, Niklas, Michael, Lev, Law, Danny, Pat-El, Na’ama, & Carling, Gerd. (n.d.). The
semantic basis of gender assignment. Manuscript submitted for
publication.
Erben Johansson, Niklas & Cronhamn, Sandra. (2023). Vocal
iconicity in nominal classification. Language and
Cognition, 15(2), 266–291.
François, Alexandre. (2008). Semantic
maps and the typology of colexification. Intertwining polysemous networks across
languages. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), From
polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic
associations (pp. 163–215). Benjamins.
Gast, Volkert, & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Marja. (2021). Patterns
of persistence and diffusibility in the European lexicon. Linguistic
Typology, 26(2), 403–438.
Geeraerts, Dirk. (1997). Diachronic
prototype semantics: A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford University Press.
Güldemann, Tom. (2023). Animacy-based
gender systems in Central Africa. Africana
Linguistica, 29, 67–123.
Hammarström, Harald, Forkel, Robert, Haspelmath, Martin, & Bank, Sebastian. (2025). Glottolog
5.2. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Huelsenbeck, John P., Nielsen, Rasmus, & Bollback, Jonathan P. (2003). Stochastic mapping of
morphological characters. Systematic
Biology, 52(2), 131–158.
Hutchison, Keith A. (2003). Is semantic priming due to
association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review, 10, 785–813.
Jackson, Joshua C., Watts, Joseph, Henry, Teague R., List, Johan-Mattis, Forkel, Robert, Mucha, Peter J., Greenhill, Simon J., Gray, Russell D., & Lindquist, Kristen A. (2019). Emotion semantics show
both cultural variation and universal
structure. Science, 366(6472), 1517–1522.
Jäger, Gerhard. (2019). Computational
historical linguistics. Theoretical
Linguistics 45(3/4): 151–182.
Johansson, Niklas. (2017). Tracking
linguistic primitives: The phonosemantic realization of fundamental oppositional
pairs. In A. Zirker, M. Bauer, O. Fischer, & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Dimensions
of iconicity: Iconicity in language and
literature (Vol. 15, pp. 39–62). Benjamins.
Landsbergen, Frank, Lachlan, Robert F., ten Cate, Carel, & Verhagen, Arie. (2010). A
cultural evolutionary model of patterns in semantic
change. Linguistics, 48(2).
Luraghi, Silvia. (2011). The
origin of the Proto-Indo-European gender system: Typological considerations. Folia
Linguistics, 45(2), 435–464.
. (2014). Gender
and word formation: the PIE gender system in a cross-linguistic
perspective. In Gender and word formation: The PIE gender system in
cross-linguistic
perspective (pp. 199–231). Brill.
Neely, James H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval
from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity
attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 106,226–254.
Nesset, Tore. (2003). The
assignment of gender and declension to Russian nouns in soft consonants: Predictability and rule
interaction. Journal of Slavic
Linguistics, 11(2), 287–322.
Pagel, Mark, Atkinson, Quentin D., & Meade, Andrew. (2007). Frequency
of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European
history. Nature, 449, 717–720.
Pinault, Georges-Jean. (2011). L’origine
déictique du genre féminin en indo-européenn. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de
Paris, 106(1), 129–182.
Ronquist, Fredrik. (2004). Bayesian
inference of character evolution. Trends in Ecology &
Evolution, 19, 475–481.
Swadesh, Morris. (1952). Lexicostatistic
dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proceedings of the American Philosophical
Society, 96, 452–463.