Cover not available
Part of
Applied Linguistics in the Middle East and North Africa: Current practices and future directions
Edited by Atta Gebril
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 15] 2017
► pp. 37–60

Chapter 3
Religion and identity in modern Egyptian public discourse

| The American University in Cairo

In modern Egypt, language is used as the linchpin for an Egyptian identity that is perceived to be a coherent and holistic one. Public discourse tackles the thorny issue of religious differences between Christians and Muslims by using two strategies: foregrounding and backgrounding. That is, in public discourse religious differences are undermined, and religion as an inclusive general belief system is highlighted. This is achieved through utilizing stance-taking processes and employing linguistic resources such as indexes of different codes/varieties, pronouns, identification categories, and metonymy. Reference to social networks, community of practice theory, and variationist approaches are also essential in helping us understand public discourse claims. Data used to verify these two claims include online articles, movies, and patriotic songs.

Keywords: discourse analysis, identity, religious discourse, media, Egypt
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • A different approach to data
  • First claim in public discourse: Linguistic variation is not dependent on religion
    • Data analysis
    • Amrīkā shīkā bīkā (‘America: A Fake Dream’) (1983)
    • Hammām fī Amstirdām (‘Hammām in Amsterdam’)(1999)
    • Ḥasan wa-Murquṣ (“Hassan and Mark’)(2008)
    • Lā muʾākhzah (‘Excuse my French’)(2014)
  • Second claim of public discourse: Egyptians are religious but religious differences between Christians and Muslims are not salient
    • Neutral mention of God
    • Mention of local areas that reference religion
    • Relating religion to other social variables
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.15.03bas
References
Abu-Haidar, F.
(1991) Christian Arabic of Baghdad. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bassiouney, R.
(2014) Language and identity in modern Egypt. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayat, A.
(2010) Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behnstedt, P., & Woidich, M.
(1985) Die ägyptisch-arabischen Dialekte. Wiesbaden: L. Reichert.Google Scholar
Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E.
(2006) Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bishārah, K. (Dir.)
(1983) Amrīkā shīkā bīkā (“America: A fake dream”). Cairo: Raḥmah lil-Intāj wa-al-Tawzīʿ.Google Scholar
Blanc, H.
(1953) Studies in North Palestinian Arabic: linguistic inquiries among the Druzes of western Galilee and Mt. Carmel. Jerusalem: Israel Oriental Society.Google Scholar
(1974) The nekteb-nektebu imperfect in a variety of Cairene Arabic. Israel Oriental Studies, 4, 206–226.Google Scholar
Cameron, D.
(1997) Demythologizing sociolinguistics. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: A Reader (pp. 55–67). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwīsh, S. (Comp.)
(1919) Qūm yā maṣrī (“Rise up, Egyptian”). Online. [URL], accessed 4 September 2013.Google Scholar
Germanos, M.-A., & Miller, C.
(2015) Is religious affiliation a key factor of language variation in Arabic speaking countries? Language & Communication, 42, 86–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeri, N.
(1996) The sociolinguistic market of Cairo: Gender, class, and education. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Ḥāmid, Saʿfīd (Dir.)
(1999) Hammam fī Amstirdām (“Hammam in Amsterdam”). Cairo: al-Subkī Vīdyū Fīlm.Google Scholar
Hunaydī, M. (Dir.)
(2007) ʿAndalīb al-Duqqī (Nightingale from Duqqi). Cairo: Rotana Distribution.Google Scholar
Imām, R. (Dir.)
(2008) Ḥasan wa-Murquṣ (“Hasan and Mark”). Cairo: al-Subkī Vīdyū Fīlm.Google Scholar
Khan, G.
(1997) The Arabic dialect of the Karaite Jews of Hît. Zeitschrift Für Arabische Linguistik, 34, 53–102.Google Scholar
Miller, C.
(2004) Variation and change in Arabic urban vernaculars. In M. Haak, R. de Jong, & K. Versteegh (Eds.), Approaches to Arabic dialects: Collection of articles presented to Manfred Woidich on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday (pp. 177–206). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Milroy, L.
(1987) Language and social networks (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, L., & Gordon, M.
(2003) Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
al-Muʿallim
(2012) al-Muʿallim fī al-lughah al-ʿarabīyah: al-ṣaff al-thālith al-iʿdādī, al-faṣl al-dirāsī al-awwal. Cairo: al-Muʾassasah al-ʿArabīyah al-Ḥadīthah.Google Scholar
Salāmah, ʿA. (Dir.)
(2014) Lā muʾākhzah (“Excuse my French”). Cairo: Film Clinic.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B., Tushyed, H., & de Bot, K.
(2000) Languages in Bethlehem: The sociolinguistic transformation of a Palestinian Town. Amsterdam: Netherlands-Israel Development Research Programme.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Y.
(2011) Arabic, self and identity: A study in conflict and displacement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Ideology and the standardization of Arabic. In R. Bassiouney (Ed.), Arabic Language and Linguistics (pp. 201–214). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Tomiche, N.
(1968) La situation linguistique en Egypte.In A. Martinet (Ed.), Le langage, (pp. 1173–1187). Paris: Encyclopedie de la Pléiade.Google Scholar
Umm, Kulthūm
(1951) Miṣr tataḥaddath ʿan nafsihā (Egypt speaks about herself). Online. [URL], accessed 4 September 2013.Google Scholar
Walters, K.
(2006) Language attitudes. In K. Versteegh (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics (pp. 442–448). Leiden: Brill 2006.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., Liebhart, K., Hirsch, A., Mitten, R., & Unger, J. W.
(2009) The discursive construction of national identity (2nd ed.) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar