Cover not available
Part of
Keeping in Touch: Emigrant letters across the English-speaking world
Edited by Raymond Hickey
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 10] 2019
► pp. 1–24

Chapter 1
Mining emigrant correspondence for linguistic insights

The examination of emigrant letters shows that a judicious exploitation of this material can yield a variety of insights regarding the linguistic structure of varieties at the time of letter writing, despite a number of caveats which must be borne in mind. The diagnostic value of vernacular correspondence would appear to be considerable in that it assists scholars in completing a picture of variety development over the past few centuries. A wide spectrum of letters helps to establish the profile of vernacular English as it was transported to different overseas locations in the later colonial period.

Keywords: emigrant letters, insights and caveats, availability of personal correspondence, vernacular features
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contextualising emigrant letters
    • 2.1The sender and writer
    • 2.2Why emigrant letters are different
    • 2.3Emigrant letters, memory and personal identity
  • 3.The nature of emigrant correspondence
    • 3.1Contact with home
    • 3.2Taxonomy of letter recipients
  • 4.Caveats regarding emigrant letters
  • 5.Testing hypotheses about the development of varieties
  • 6.Available emigrant letters
  • 7.The linguistic analysis of emigrant correspondence
    • 7.1Spelling and punctuation
    • 7.2Annie’s story
      • 7.2.1Authorship and education
      • 7.2.2Emigrant letters and the postal service
    • 7.3Annie Carroll as letter writer
      • 7.3.1Indications of Irish pronunciations
      • 7.3.2Linguistic features of correspondence
  • 8.Structure of volume
    • 8.1The language of emigrant correspondence
    • 8.2The language of the Irish emigrant experience
    • 8.3Vernacular correspondence: Widening the scope
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.10.01hic
References
Auer, Anita, Daniel Schreier, Richard J. Watts
(eds) 2015 Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander T.
2007 Letters. A new approach to text typology. In: Nevalainen and Tanskanen (eds), pp.27–46.Google Scholar
Bermejo-Giner, Maria G. and Michael Montgomery
1997 Regional British English in the nineteenth century: Evidence from emigrant letters. In: Alan Thomas (ed.) Issues and Methods in Dialectology. Bangor: University of North Wales Press, pp.167–183.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Rebecca
2006 Thomas Reid’s theory of memory, History of Philosophy Quarterly 23.2: 171–187.Google Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan
2015 Emerging standards in the colonies: variation and the Canadian letter writer. In: Auer, Schreier and Watts (eds), pp.101–113.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina
2007 “As this leaves me at present”. Formulaic usage, politeness and social proximity in nineteenth-century Scottish emigrants’ letters. In: Elspaß et al. (eds), pp.13–29.Google Scholar
2012a “I write you these few lines”: Metacommunication and pragmatics in nineteenth-century Scottish emigrants’ letters. In: Ulrich Busse and Axel Hübler (eds) Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English. A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.45–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b The study of correspondence: Theoretical and methodological issues. In: Dossena and Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), pp.13–30.Google Scholar
2014 Towards a corpus of nineteenth-century correspondence. Linguistica e Filologia 18: 195–214.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti
(eds) 2012 Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Susan Fitzmaurice
(eds) 2006 Business and Official Correspondence. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Ingrid Tieken Boon-van Ostade
(eds) 2009 Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence. Methodology and Data. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar
1953 The Auxiliary ‘Do’. The Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan
2002 Standard German in the nineteenth-century? (Counter-)evidence from the private correspondence of “ordinary people”. In: Andrew R. Linn and Nicola McLelland (eds) Standardization. Studies from the Germanic Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.43–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Between linguistic creativity and formulaic restriction: Cross-linguistic perspectives on nineteenth-century lower class writers’ private letters. In: Dossena and Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), pp.45–64.Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Nils, Joachim Scharloth and Wim Vandenbussche
(eds) 2007 Germanic Language Histories from Below (1700–2000). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairman, Tony
2003 Letters of the English labouring classes 1800–34 and the English language. In: Marina Dossena and Charles Jones (eds) Insights into Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang, pp.265–282.Google Scholar
Fens-de Zeeuw, Lyda
2008 The letter-writing manual in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries: from polite to practical. In: Dossena and Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds), pp.163–192.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan
2004 The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English. A Pragmatic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015 English aristocratic letters. In: Auer et al. (eds), pp.101–113.Google Scholar
2010 Coalitions, networks, and discourse communities in Augustan England: The Spectator and the early eighteenth-century essay. In: Raymond Hickey (ed.) Eighteenth-Century English. Ideology and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.106–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, David
2006 Irish emigration and the art of letter-writing. In: Elliott, Bruce S, David A. Gerber and Suzanne M. Sinke (eds) 2006 Letters across Borders. The epistolary practices of international migrants. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.97–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golden, Catherine J.
2009 Posting It: The Victorian Revolution in Letter Writing. Gainesville, FL:University Press of Florida. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre
2015 Assessing variability and change in early English letters. In: Auer, Schreier and Watts (eds), pp.14–34.Google Scholar
(eds) 2012 The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond
2007 Irish English. History and Present-day Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Irish English in early modern drama. The birth of a linguistic stereotype. In: Raymond Hickey (ed.) Varieties of English in Writing. The Written Word as Linguistic Evidence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Vernacular reports from the colonies. Letters back home by Irish emigrants, in: Nicholas Brownlees (ed.) The Language of Discovery. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2017 The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hindley, Reg
1991 The Death of the Irish Language. A qualified obituary. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Houston, Cecil J. and William J. Smyth
1990 Irish Emigration and Canadian Settlement: patterns, links, and letters. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Stanley B. and Shaun Nichols
2012 Memory and the sense of personal identity, Mind 121: 677–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lesser, Harry
1978 Reid’s criticism of Hume’s theory of personal identity, Hume Studies 4: 41–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin
2014 “I dont care one cent what Ø goying on in great Britten” BE-deletion in Irish English. American Speech 89.4: 441–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin and Carolina P. Amador-Moreno
2012 “I will be expecting a letter from you before this reaches you”. A corpus-based study of shall/will variation in Irish English correspondence. In: Dossena and Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), pp.179–204.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael
1995 The linguistic value of Ulster emigrant letters. Ulster Folklife 41: 1–15.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1999 Making the best use of “bad” data: evidence for sociolinguistic variation in Early Modern English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100.4: 499–533.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen
(eds) 2007 Letter Writing. Originally published as a special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5.2 (2004). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
2017 [2003] Historical Sociolinguistics. Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. Second edition. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nobels, Judith and Marijke van der Wal
2009 Tackling the writer-sender problem. The newly developed Leiden Identification Procedure (LIP)’, Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics, [URL]. Last accessed, December 2018.Google Scholar
Palma, A. B.
1964 Memory and personal identity, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 42.1: 53–68. Published online 2006. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, John
2008 Personal identity, memory, and the problem of circularity, in: Perry, John (ed.) Personal Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp.136–155.Google Scholar
Piccirillo, Ryan A.
2010 The Lockean memory theory of personal identity: Definition, objection, response, Inquiries 2.8 (online publication).Google Scholar
Pietsch, Lukas
2015 Archaism and dialect in Irish emigrant letters. In: Auer, Schreier and Watts (eds), pp.223–239.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana
(ed.) 2000 The English History of African American Vernacular English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rickford, John
1998. The creole origins of African American Vernacular English: Evidence from copula absence. In: Salikoko S. Mufwene, John R. Rickford and Guy Bailey (eds) African American English. London: Routledge 1998, pp.154–199.Google Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert and Marijke J. van der Wal
2014 Letters as Loot: a sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sairio, Anni, Samuli Kaislaniemi, Anna Maria Merikallio, Terttu Nevalainen
2018 Charting orthographical reliability in a corpus of English historical letters, ICAME Journal 42: 79–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaislaniemi, Samuli , Mel Evans, Teo Juvonen and Anni Sairio
2017 “A graphic system which leads its own linguistic life”?: Epistolary spelling in English, 1400-1800. In: Tanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin and Anita Auer (eds) Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.187–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2004 The English dialect heritage of the southern United States. In: Raymond Hickey (ed.) Legacies of Colonial English. Studies in Transported Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.262–309.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. and Michael B. Montgomery
2001 On the trail of early nonstandard grammar: An electronic corpus of Southern U.S. antebellum overseers’ letters, American Speech 76: 388–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrier, Arnold
1958 Ireland and the Irish Emigration, 1850–1900. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney S.
1959 Personal identity and memory, Journal of Philosophy 56.22: 868–822. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staff, Frank
1993 The Penny Post 1680-1918. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
1987 The Auxiliary do in Eighteenth-century English. A Sociohistorical-Linguistic Approach. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tieken Boon-von Ostade, Ingrid
2005 Eighteenth-century English letters. In search of the vernacular. Linguistica e Filologia 21: 113–146.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard
2015 Setting the scene: letters, standards and historical sociolinguistics. In: Auer et al. (eds), pp.1–13.Google Scholar
Wilson, Anne and Michael Ross
2003 The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side, Memory 11.2: 137–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar