Mobile Menu
New
Books
Forthcoming titles
New in paperback
New titles by subject
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
Book Series
Journals & Yearbooks
New serials
Latest issues
Currently in production
Catalog
Books
Active series
Other series
Collections
Open-access books
Text books & Course books
Dictionaries & Reference
By JB editor
Journals & Yearbooks
Active serials
Other
By JB editor
Software
Browse by person
Browse by subject
Advanced Search
Downloadable lists
Printed catalogs
E-book collections
Online Resources
Customer Services
Contact
Amsterdam (Main office)
Philadelphia (North American office)
Directions
Book Orders
General
US, Canada & Mexico
E-books
Examination & Desk Copies
Journal Subscriptions
General information
Access to the electronic edition
Terms of Use
Journal collections
Journal mutations
Rights & Permissions
Mailing List
E-newsletter
Book Gazette
For Authors
Proposals for Books
Proposals for Book Series
Proposals for Journals
Submissions to Journals
Editorial Manager
Ethics Statement
Kudos
Open Access Policy
Rights Policy
For Librarians
Evidence-Based Acquisition
E-book Collections
Journal Collections
Open Access information
Journal mutations
Part of
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[
Argumentation in Context
17] 2019
► pp.
299
–
320
◄
previous
next
►
Chapter 16
On philosophical argumentation
Towards a pragma-dialectical solution of a puzzle
Fernando Leal
Article outline
1.
Introduction
2.
The pragma-dialectic concept of a disagreement
3.
First example: Dante, Aristotle, and others
4.
A few contemporary examples
5.
The proposed solution to the puzzle
6.
Conclusion
Notes
References
Published online: 23 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.16lea
References
Aakhus, M.
, &
Lewiński, M.
(
2017
)
Advancing polylogical analysis of large-scale argumentation: Disagreement management in the fracking controversy
.
Argumentation
, 31(1), 179–207.
Barnes, J.
(
1969
)
Aristotle’s theory of demonstration
.
Phronesis
, 14(2), 123–152.
Blackford, R.
, &
Broderick, D.
(
2017
)
Philosophy’s future: The problem of philosophical progress
. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bourget, D.
, &
Chalmers, D. J.
(
2014
)
What do philosophers believe?
Philosophical Studies
, 170(3), 465–500.
Burge, T.
(
1986
)
Individualism and psychology
.
Philosophical Review
, 94(1), 3–45.
Chalmers, D. J.
(
2011
)
Verbal disputes
.
Philosophical Review
, 120(4), 515–566.
Chalmers, D. J.
(
2015
)
Why isn’t there more progress in philosophy?
Philosophy
, 90(1), 3–31.
Clark, A.
, &
Chalmers, D. J.
(
1998
)
The extended mind
.
Analysis
, 58(1), 7–19.
Collingwood, R. G.
(
1939
)
An autobiography
. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Collins, R.
(
1998
)
The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge
, MA: The Belknap Press.
van Eemeren, F. H.
(
2010
)
Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, F. H.
(
2018
)
Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective
. Cham, CH: Springer.
Ferejohn, M.
(
1991
)
The origins of Aristotelian science
. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gaos, J.
(
1960
)
De la filosofía
[
On philosophy
]. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Grosjean, M.
(
2004
)
From multi-participant talk to genuine polylogue: Shift-change briefing sessions at the hospital
. In
Kerbrat-Orecchioni
(Ed.) 2004, 25–52.
Harman, G.
(
2011
)
Quentin Meillassoux: Philosophy in the making
. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hill, G. N.
, &
Hill, K. T.
(
1995
)
Real life dictionary of the law
. Los Angeles: General Publishing Group.
Hintikka, J.
(
1972
)
On the ingredients of an Aristotelian science
.
Noûs
, 6(1), 55–69.
Jaspers, K.
(
1919
)
Psychologie der Weltanschauungen
. Berlin: Springer.
Johnstone, H. W., Jr.
(
1959
)
Philosophy and argument
. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Johnstone, H. W., Jr.
(
1978
)
Validity and rhetoric in philosophical argument
. University Park, PA: The Dialogue Press of Man & World.
Kant, I.
(
1781
)
Critik der reinen Vernunft
. Riga: Hartknoch.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
(Ed.)
(
2004
)
Polylogue
. Special issue of the
Journal of Pragmatics
, 36(1), 1–145.
Kusch, M.
(
1995
)
Psychologism: A case study in the sociology of philosophical knowledge
. London: Routledge.
Ladyman, J.
, &
Ross, D.
(
2007
)
Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized
. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewiński, M.
(
2014a
)
Argumentative polylogues in a dialectical framework: A methodological inquiry
.
Argumentation
, 28(2), 161–185.
Lewiński, M.
(
2014b
)
Practical reasoning in argumentative polylogues
.
Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación
, 8, 1–20.
Marcoccia, M.
(
2004
)
On-line polylogues: Conversation structure and participation framework in internet newsgroups
. In
Kerbrat-Orecchioni
(Ed.) 2004, 115–145.
Menary, R.
(
2010
)
Introduction: The extended mind in focus
. In
R. Menary
(Ed.),
The extended mind
(pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Overgaard, S.
,
Gilbert, P.
, &
Burwood, S.
(
2013
)
An introduction to metaphilosophy
. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Passmore, J.
(
1961
)
Philosophical reasoning
. New York: Scribner.
Pigliucci, M.
(
2017
)
The nature of philosophy: How philosophy makes progress and why it matters
. New York: Author (Amazon Kindle).
Putnam, H.
(
1975
)
Philosophical papers, vol. 2: Mind, language, and reality
. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Redding, P.
(
2007
)
Analytic philosophy and the return of Hegelian thought
. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rescher, N.
(
1978
)
Philosophical disagreement: An essay towards orientational pluralism in metaphilosophy
.
The Review of Metaphysics
, 32(2), 217–251.
Rescher, N.
(
1985
)
The strife of systems: An essay on the grounds and implications of philosophical diversity
. Pittsburgh: The University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rescher, N.
(
2001
)
Philosophical reasoning: A study in the methodology of philosophizing
. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stoljar, D.
(
2017
)
Philosophical progress: In defence of a reasonable optimism
. New York: Oxford University Press.
Strawson, G.
(
2004a
)
A fallacy of our age
.
The Times Literary Supplement
,
October
15
.
Strawson, G.
(
2004b
)
Against narrativity
.
Ratio
(new series), XVII, 428–452.
Strawson, G.
(
2018
)
Things that bother me: Death, freedom, the self, etc
. New York: New York Review Books.
Weber, Z.
(Ed.)
(
2011
)
Philosophy’s future
. Special Issue of
Essays in Philosophy
, 12 (
[URL]
).
Williamson, T.
(
2018
)
Doing philosophy: From common curiosity to logical reasoning
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.