Cover not available
Part of
Let's talk politics: New essays on deliberative rhetoric
Edited by Hilde Van Belle, Kris Rutten, Paul Gillaerts, Dorien Van De Mieroop and Baldwin Van Gorp
[Argumentation in Context 6] 2014
► pp. 13–25

Aristotle on deliberation

Its place in ethics, politics and rhetoric

Aristotle differs from most later philosophers in distinguishing clearly between epistemic reasoning, which aims for truth, and practical reasoning, which does not. How can he posit this distinction and yet not dismiss practical reasoning as flattery and manipulation, as Plato did? The answer lies in the concepts of deliberation (boulē, bouleusis) and deliberate choice (proairesis). They link Aristotle’s rhetoric, ethics, and politics together and help provide definitions of all three: Ethics is about deliberate choices by individuals. Politics and rhetoric are about the collective deliberate choices by the polity: politics is about making these choices well so that the good life of all citizens is optimally secured; rhetoric is the principal means to do this. These links have not been much discussed by scholars, probably because few studies range across these three Aristotelian ‘arts’; a proper discussion of them should draw on modern work in ethics, political science, and rhetoric. These key concepts and Aristotle’s discussions of them offer inspiration for modern theories of ‘deliberative democracy,’ citizenship, argumentation, debate, and the public sphere.

Published online: 30 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.6.01koc
References
Aristotle
(1995)  The complete works of Aristotle. The revised Oxford translation . I-II. 6. printing with corrections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(1991)  On rhetoric: a theory of civic discourse . Trans. George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford UP 1991.Google Scholar
Brockriede, W. and Ehninger, D
(1960) Toulmin on argument: an interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 46, 44–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downs, A
(1957a) An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy 65, 135–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1957b)  An economic theory of democracy . New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J
(2000)  Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Rhetoric in democracy: a systemic appreciation. Political Theory 38, 319–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W
(1975)  Aristotle on emotion: a contribution to philosophical psychology, rhetoric, poetics, politics and ethics . New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Habermas, J
(1997)  The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society . Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original: Die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band I: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung 1981.)Google Scholar
Johnstone, C. L
(1980) An Aristotelian Trilogy: ethics, rhetoric, politics, and the search for moral truth. Philosophy & Rhetoric 13,: 1–24.Google Scholar
Kenny, A
(1966) Practical inference. Analysis 26, 65–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1979)  Aristotle’s theory of the will . London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Kock, C
(2003) Multidimensionality and non-deductiveness in deliberative argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, and A. F. S. Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone who has a view: theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation (pp. 155–171). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Norms of legitimate dissensus. Informal Logic 27, 179–196.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Choice is not true or false: the domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation 23, 61–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larmore, C
(1996) Pluralism and reasonable disagreement. In The Morals of Modernity (pp.152–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, M. P
(1987) Aristotle’s defense of rhetoric. The Journal of Politics 49, 657–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M
(1986)  The fragility of goodness . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Triadafilopoulos, T
(1999) Politics, speech, and the art of persuasion: toward an Aristotelian conception of the public sphere. The Journal of Politics 61, 741–757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yack, B
(2006) Rhetoric and public reasoning: an Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation. Political Theory 34, 417–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Craig, Robert T.
2023. Deliberative Play. American Behavioral Scientist 67:8 ► pp. 951 ff. DOI logo
de Castro Caeiro, António
2023. Aiming for True Life as an Act of Choice. In Aristotle on Truth, Dialogue, Justice and Decision [Law and Philosophy Library, 144], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Husted, Emil & Majken Mac
2021. Instituting Deliberation: Three Stages of Bottom-Up Policymaking in Denmark’s Alternative Party. In Soziologie der Parteien [Politische Soziologie, ], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.