Article In: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Sustainability (DEIS) in Language Education
Edited by Subhan Zein
[AILA Review 39:2] 2026
► pp. 331–352
Student-student cooperation promotes diversity, inclusion, and the SDGs in language education
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Language learners are diverse in many ways. These differences
include country of origin, ethnicity, gender, religion, social class, past
achievement, sexual identity, neurotype, mother tongue, age, physical and mental
disabilities, and previous education. Everyone deserves respect and the right to
a learning environment in which their needs, both physiological and
psychological, are met. This article explores how inclusion, diversity, and the
United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can meet these needs.
Inclusion brings together diverse language users to benefit from what each can
contribute based on their uniqueness, to empower others to do the same, and to
use their language proficiency and other skills to make the world a better
place. Various approaches in language education seek to support “unity in
diversity” among students by facilitating student-student cooperation.
Cooperative learning is one such approach. Since the 1970s, cooperative learning
has established itself as a well-researched approach with a strong and wide
theoretical grounding. Furthermore, scholars have linked cooperative learning to
many other elements of the student-centered paradigm, including work that urges
education to play a role in making society a better place rather than focusing
solely on enhancing individuals’ own careers and lifestyles. The SDGs present a
well-known example of how education can serve the greater good and build a world
in which everyone, regardless of background, can be included in a grand effort
to make the planet a place where everyone feels at home and can contribute to
making that home a place where everyone can thrive.
Article outline
- Diversity, inclusion, and the SDGs
- Cooperative learning: History, theory, and research
- Cooperative learning principles
- Positive interdependence
- Individual accountability
- Equal opportunity to participate
- Maximum peer interactions
- Group accountability
- Heterogeneous grouping
- Cooperative skills
- Cooperation as a value
- Two cooperative learning techniques to illustrate the eight principles
- Think Aloud Squares
- Jigsaw
- Conclusion
References
References (68)
Ahmed, A. O., & Abd Algane, M. (2024). An
investigation of cooperative learning strategies in improving students’
comprehension skills in the context of English as a Foreign Language
(EFL). Education and Linguistics
Research, 10(2).
Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting
inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international
experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in
Educational
Policy, 6(1), 7–16.
Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2012). Developing
equitable education
systems. Routledge.
Al Malki, E. A. A., Gulnaz, F., Javid, C. Z., & Chaudhry, M. Z. (2022). An
empirical investigation of the EFL learners’ attitudes toward the
effectiveness of cooperative learning. Sage
Open, 12(4).
Alzubi, A. A., Nazim, M., & Ahamad, J. (2024). Examining
the effect of a collaborative learning intervention on EFL students’ English
learning and social interaction. Journal of
Pedagogical
Research, 8(2), 26–46.
Aronson, E. (2002). Building
empathy, compassion, and achievement in the jigsaw
classroom. In J. M. Aronson (Ed.), Improving
academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on
education (pp. 209–225). Academic Press.
(2025). The
jigsaw classroom. [URL]
Banks, J. A. (2016). Cultural
diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and
teaching (6th
ed.). Routledge.
Beronilla, J. M., & Natividad, L. (2025). Heterogeneous
over homogeneous grouping in the classroom: An argument for inclusive
education. SSRN. [URL]
Chesterman, S. (2023, April 10). Meritocracy
2.0. SimonChesterman.com. [URL]
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing
groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous
classroom (3rd
ed.). Teachers College Press.
Deutsch, M. (2011). Cooperation
and
competition. In Conflict,
interdependence, and justice: The intellectual legacy of Morton
Deutsch (pp. 23–40). [URL].
Dinh, C. T. (2025). Investigating
EFL students’ perceived values of online cooperative learning in
MOOCs. Contemporary Educational
Technology, 17(1), Article
ep552.
Einstein, A. (1950, March 29). Letter
to a man who lost his
son. In H. Nathan (Ed.), The
New York Post.
García, O., & Sarroub, L. K. (2025). Beyond
puntos y rayas: Translanguaging pedagogy for language
minoritized students. Literacy Research:
Theory, Method, and
Practice, 74(1), 76–91.
Halabi, S., Chernyak Hai, L., & Nadler, A. (2024). The
meaning of seeking help: The effects of ascribed and achieved status of the
help seeker on observer attributions, expectations, and willingness to offer
help. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, 54(9), 509–522.
Iniesto, F., & Bossu, C. (2023). Equity,
diversity, and inclusion in open education: A systemic literature
review. Distance
Education, 44(4), 694–711.
Jacob, J. (2025). A
background history of the Sustainable Development
Goals. Sustainable
Development, 33(2), 311–325.
Jia, J., & Stapa, M. (2024). The
use of English interaction strategies in cooperative learning: A case study
of four Chinese college students’ spoken
discourse. Journal of Nusantara Studies
(JONUS), 9(1), 25–52.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1975). Learning
together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic
learning. Prentice Hall.
(2009). An
educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and
cooperative learning. Educational
Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (2013). The
nuts and bolts of cooperative
learning. Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative
learning methods: A meta
analysis. University of Minnesota.
Khan, A., Khan, M., & Haq, F. (2025). Cooperative
learning strategies’ impact on students’ comprehension of reading in the
English language. Review Journal of Social
Psychology & Social
Works, 3(1), 110–118.
Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (2013). A
meta analysis of the effects of face to face cooperative learning: Do recent
studies falsify or verify earlier
findings? Educational Research
Review, 101, 133–149.
Lee, C., Cherian, M., Ismail, R., Ng, M., Sim, J., & Chee, M. F. (2004). Children’s
experiences of multiracial relationships in informal primary school
settings. In A. E. Lai (Ed.), Beyond
rituals and riots: Ethnic pluralism and social cohesion in
Singapore (pp. 114–145). Eastern Universities Press.
Liang, X., Mohan, B. A., & Early, M. (1998). Issues
of cooperative learning in ESL classes: A literature
review. TESL Canada
Journal, 15(2), 13–23.
Lily, M., & Sharma, B. (2025). Inclusive
society: A pathway to achieving Sustainable Development
Goals. International Journal of Environmental
Sciences, 11(3), 503–510.
Lim, S., Reidak, J., Chau, M. H., Zhu, C. H., Guo, Q., Brooks, T. A., Roe, J., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). Cooperative
learning and the SDGs. Peachey Publications. [URL]
Long, M. H. (1996). The
role of the linguistic environment in second language
acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook
of second language
acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Maley, A., & Peachey, N. (Eds.). (2017). Integrating
global issues in the creative English language classroom: With reference to
the United Nations Sustainable Development
Goals. British Council. [URL]
McGroarty, M. (1989). The
benefits of cooperative learning arrangements in second language
instruction. NABE
Journal, 13(2), 127–143.
(1993). Cooperative
learning and second language learning. Annual
Review of Applied
Linguistics, 131, 113–126.
Nguyen, P. M., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2006). Culturally
appropriate pedagogy: The case of group learning in a Confucian Heritage
Culture context. Intercultural
Education, 17(1), 1–19.
Nisha, P. R. (2024). Comparing
grammar translation method and communicative language teaching in EFL
context. Journal of English Language
Teaching, 5(1), 40–48.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social
constructivist perspectives on teaching and
learning. Annual Review of
Psychology, 491, 345–375.
Pervez, S. (2025). English
immersion at middle tier private schools in Karachi, Pakistan: A case study
of students’ additive v. subtractive language learning
experience. Journal of Multilingual and
Multicultural
Development, 46(7), 1733–1748.
Richards, J. C. (2024). Curriculum
development in language teaching (2nd
ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, C., Lyon, H., & Tausch, R. (2013). On
becoming an effective teacher: Person centered teaching, psychology,
philosophy, and dialogues with Carl R. Rogers and Harold
Lyon. Routledge.
Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Galloway, N. (2021). Global
Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical
research. Language
Teaching, 54(2), 157–189.
Ruas, L. (Ed.). (2020). Creating
change: Global issues in Africa. IATEFL Global Issues Special Interest Group. [URL]
(Ed.). (2021). Creating
global change. IATEFL Global Issues Special Interest Group. [URL]
Singapore
Government. (2024). What are the
racial proportions among Singapore citizens? [URL]
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative
learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd
ed.). Prentice Hall.
Stibbe, A. (2021). Ecolinguistics:
Language, ecology and the stories we live by (2nd
ed.). Routledge.
Su, Y. R., Jaya, A., Hakim, M. A., & Syafiqah, N. (2025). The
use of technology in task based language teaching (TBLT) to improve
students’ speaking skills in a collaborative EFL learning
environment. Journal of Education and Applied
Teaching
(JEAT), 1(2), 69–80. [URL]
Suseno, E. (2023). Paraphrasing
a peer’s utterances to develop the students’ speaking
fluency. Journal of Education Method and
Learning
Strategy, 1(3), 151–165.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative
competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in
its
development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input
in second language
acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.
Tan, C. (2017). Confucianism
and
education. In B. Lingard, S. Sellar, S. Lewis, & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Oxford
research encyclopedia of
education (pp. 1–18). Oxford University Press.
Tang, K., Noordin, N., & Ismail, L. (2025). Evaluating
the think aloud method for English reading: A systematic
review. Cogent
Education, 12(1), 2497150.
Thornbury, S. (2024). The
new A Z of ELT: A dictionary of terms and
concepts (2nd
ed.). Macmillan Education.
Tomasello, M. (2014). The
ultra social animal. European Journal of
Social
Psychology, 44(3), 187–194.
UNESCO. (2012). Education
for all. [URL]
United
Nations. (n.d.). The 17
goals. [URL]
. (2016, March 1). Monitoring
the SDGs in the
Caribbean [Report]. ECLAC Caribbean. [URL]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind
in society (M. Cole, V. John Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., Shein, P., & Melkonian, D. K. (2009). ‘Explain
to your partner’: Teachers’ instructional practices and students’ dialogue
in small groups. Cambridge Journal of
Education, 39(1), 49–70.
Zaki, J. (2022). Don’t
let cynicism undermine your
workplace. Harvard Business
Review, 100(5), 70–78. [URL]
