This contribution studies the synchrony and diachrony of German plural variants. Plural doublets in the sense of overabundance must be restricted to variants with the same meaning used by one and the same speech community. But there is a preference for distinctiveness which assigns different pragmatic or semantic meanings to variants. This includes also a preference for iconic relationships between form and meaning. The assumption of a preference for biuniqueness appears to allow greater generalizations than the ideal of canonical paradigm forms.
2008Lexical Plurals: A Morphosemantic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beard, Robert
1995Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. Albany: SUNY Press.
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2009Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Dunstan & Andrew Hippisley
2012Network Morphology: A Defaults-based Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, Greville G
2007“Canonical Typology, Suppletion and Possible Words”. Language 83.8–42.
Corbett, Greville G
2009“Canonical Inflection Classes”. Selected Proceedings of the Sixth Décembrettes: Morphology in Bordeaux ed. by Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng, 1–11. Sommerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Coseriu, Eugenio
1975“System Norm und Rede”. Sprachtheorie und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 11–101. München: Fink.
Dressler, Wolfgang U
2003“Degrees of Grammatical Productivity in Inflectional Morphology”. Italian Journal of Linguistics 15.31–62.
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Karlheinz Mörth
2012“Produktive und weniger produktive Komposition in ihrer Rolle im Text an Hand der Beziehungen zwischen Titel und Text”. Das Deutsche als kompositionsfreudige Sprache ed. by Livio Gaeta & Barbara Schlücker, 219–234. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Korecky-Kröll, Katharina, Gary Libben, Nicole Stempfer, Julia Wiesinger, Eva Reinisch, Johannes Bertl & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2012“Helping a Crocodile to Learn German Plurals: Children’s Online Judgment of Actual, Potential and Illegal Plural Forms”. Morphology 22.35–65.
Ljungerud, Ivar
1995Zur Nominalflexion in der deutschen Literatursprache seit 1900. Lund: Gleerup.
Paul, Hermann
1880Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Paul, Hermann
1897Deutsches Wörterbuch. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Pfeifer, Wolfgang
1993Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. 2nd edition. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. ([URL])
Stump, Gregory T
2001Inflectional Morphology. A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thornton, Anna M
2011“Overabundance (Multiple Forms Realizing the Same Cell): A Non-Canonical Phenomenon in Italian Verb Morphology”. Morphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology ed. by Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin, 362–385. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wegener, Heide
2003“Normprobleme bei der Pluralbildung fremder und nativer Substantive”. Linguistik Online 16.119–157.
Wegener, Heide
2004“Pizzas und Pizzen, die Pluralformen (un)assimilierter Fremdwörter im Deutschen”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 23.47–112.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Gardani, Francesco, Franz Rainer & Hans Christian Luschützky
2019. Competition in Morphology: A Historical Outline. In Competition in Inflection and Word-Formation [Studies in Morphology, 5], ► pp. 3 ff.
2024. Semantic transparency and doublet formation: the case of Hebrew location nouns. Morphology
Lečić, Dario
2015. Morphological doublets in Croatian: the case of the instrumental singular. Russian Linguistics 39:3 ► pp. 375 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.
