References
Alexander, Luther Herbert
1912Participial Substantives of the -ata type in the Romance Languages with Special Reference to French. New York: Columbia University Studies in Romance Philology and Literature.Google Scholar
Appel, Ernst
1883De genere neutro intereunte in lingua latina. Degree dissertation, University of Erlangen.Google Scholar
Beavers, John
2011On affectedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 335–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1935Origines de la formation des noms en indo-européen. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
1948Noms d’agent et noms d’action en indo-européen. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Brâncus, Grigore
2007Studii de istorie a limbii române. Bucarest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl & Berthold, Delbruck
1897–1916Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Kurzgefasste Darstellung der Geschichte des Altindischen, Altiranischen (Avestischen und Altpersischen), Lateinischen, Umbrisch-Samnitischen, Altirischen, Gotischen, Althochdeutschen, Litauischen und Altkirchenslavischen. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Caragiu Marioţeanu, Matilda
1962Moduri ne personale. Studii şi cercetări lingvistice 13. 29–43.Google Scholar
Cojocaru, Dana
2003Romanian Grammar. Slavic and East European Language Research Center (SEELRC). Durham: Duke University.Google Scholar
Collin, Carl S. R.
1904Zur Geschichte des Nomina Actionis im Romanischen. Archiv für Lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik 13. 453–473.Google Scholar
1918Le développement de sens du suffixe -ata dans les langues romanes, spécialement au point de vue du français. Lund: A.-B. Ph. Lindstedts Universitets-Bokhandel.Google Scholar
Cooper, Frederic
1895Word Formation in the Roman Sermo Plebeius. An historical study of the development of vocabulary in Vulgar and Late Latin, with special reference to the Romance Languages. New York: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra
2001Romanian Nominalizations: Case and Aspectual Structure. Journal of Linguistics 37. 467–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corti, Maria
1953Contributi al lessico predantesco. Il tipo ‘il turbato’, ‘la perduta’. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 38. 50–92.Google Scholar
Dal, Georgette & Fiammetta Namer
2010Les noms en -ance/-ence du français : quel(s) patron(s) constructionnel(s)? In Franck Neveu, Valelia Muni Toke, Thomas Klingler, Jacques Durand, Lorenza Mondada & Sophie Prévost (eds.), 2ème Congès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF 2010, 893–907. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Densusianu, Ovid
1961Istoria limbii române. Vol. II. Bucarest: Editura Ştiinţifică.Google Scholar
Di Gennaro, Rosana
2010Nuovi modelli per l’analisi e la didattica delle lingue antiche. Nome, verbo, aggettivo e processi di trans-categorizzazione. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar
Diez, Friedrich
1838Grammatik der Romanischen Sprachen. Vol. II. Bonn: Weber.Google Scholar
Dragomirescu, Adina
2010Ergativitatea: tipologia, sintactică, semantică. PhD Dissertation. University of Bucarest.Google Scholar
2013Du latin au roumain: une nouvelle hypothèse sur l’origin du supin en roumain. Revue de linguistique romane 77. 51–85.Google Scholar
Du Cange, Charles
1982Glossarium mediae et infimae latinitatis. Bologna: Forni (First edition 1610–1688).Google Scholar
Ferret, Karen, Elena Soare & Florence Villoing
2010Rivalry between French -age and -ée: the Role of Grammatical Aspect in Nominalization. In Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager & Katrin Schulz (eds.), Logic, Language and Meaning. Proceedings of the 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, 284–294. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Jr. Van Valin
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frâncu, Constantin
2009Gramatica limbii române vechi (1521–1780). Iaşi: Demiurg.Google Scholar
Fruyt, Michèle
1996Nom de procès en latin. Évaluation des positions benvenistiennes dans “Nom d’agent et noms d’action en indo-européen”. In Hannah Rosén (eds.), Aspects of Latin, Papers from the Seventh International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 193–206. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sparchwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio
2002Quando i verbi compaiono come nomi. Un saggio di Morfologia Naturale. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
2009A metà tra nomi e verbi: i nomi d’azione tra morfologia, sintassi e semantica. In Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri & Lunella Mereu (eds.), Spazi inguistici. Studi in onore di Raffaele Simone, 111–123. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2015Action Nouns in Romance. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft /Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science], vol. II, 1165–1185. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2017Nomi deverbali in MIDIA, In Paolo D’achille & Maria Grossmann (eds.), Per la storia della formazione delle parole in italiano: un nuovo corpus in rete (MIDIA) e nuove prospettive di studio, 221-241. Florence: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar
Gardani, Francesco
2013Dinamiche di produttività flessiva: dal latino arcaico all’italiano antico. In Emili Casanova Herrero & Cesáreo Calvo Rigual (eds.), Actas del XXVI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románica, vol. II, 193–204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georges, Emanuel S.
1968Past-Participial Nouns: Their Development from Latin to Romance. Romance Philology 21. 368–391.Google Scholar
1970Studies in Romance Nouns Extracted from Past Participlex. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gianollo, C.
2005Middle Voice and the phenomenon of Split Intransitivity. In Gualteiro Calboli (ed.), Latina Lingua! Proceedings of the Twelfth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 97–109. Roma: Herder.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob
1822–1837Deutsche Grammatik. Göttingen: Dieterich’sche Buch-handlung.Google Scholar
Hill, Virginia
2002The gray area of supine clauses. Linguistics 40. 495–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iordăchioaia, Gianina & Elena Soare
2008Two kinds of Event Plurals: Evidence from Romanian Nominalizations. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7. 194–216.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazzeroni, Romano
1990La diatesi come categoria linguistica: studio sul medio indoeuropeo. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 30. 1–22.Google Scholar
1997La transitività come categoria linguistica. I nomi d’azione indoeuropei. Incontri linguistici 20. 71–82.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Ergative and active traits in Latin. In Frans Plank (ed.), Relational typology 243–255. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin
2012Supin şi participiu trecut în morfologia istorică a limbii române. In Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu & Alexandru Nicolae (eds.), Limba română. Direcţii actuale în cercetarea linguistica, Vol. I, 11–18. Bucarest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti,Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov
1945Development of the Latin suffixes -antia and -entia in the Romance languages, with special regard to- Ibero-Romance. Berkeley: University of Calfornia Press.Google Scholar
1977The social matrix of Palaeo-Romance postverbal nouns. Romance Philology 31. 55–90.Google Scholar
Marouzeau, Jules
1949Quelques aspects de la formation du Latin Littéraire. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm
1890Grammatik der Italienischen Sprache. Leipzig: Reisland.Google Scholar
1895Grammaire des langues romanes. Vol. II: Morphologie. Paris: Welter.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2009How transitive are 'eat' and 'drink' verbs? In John Newman (ed.), The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking, 27–43. Amsterdam: BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej J. Jaxontov
1988Typology of Resultative Constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of Resultative Constructions 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ott, Johann N.
1874Die Substantivierung des lateinischen Adjectivum durch Ellipse. Rottweil: Programm.Google Scholar
Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela
2007Din nou despre participiu şi supin. Studii şi cercetări lingvistice 58. 163–173.Google Scholar
2008Supinul. In Valeria Guţu Romalo (ed.), Gramatica limbii române, Vol. I., 509–524. Bucarest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
2011Din istoria supinului românesc. In Rodica Zafiu, R., Camelia Uşurelu & Helga Oprea (eds.), Limba română – ipostaze ale variaţiei lingistice, Vol. I, 119–130. Bucarest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
2013The supine. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), The Grammar of Romanian, 233–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paucker, Carl
1870De Latinitate Scriptorum Historiae Augustae. Dorpat: Glaeser.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reisig, Karl
1881Vorlesungen über lateinische Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. I. Berlin: Hagen.Google Scholar
Renou, Louis
1937Monographies Sanskrites. Vol II: Le suffixe -tu- et la constitution des infinitifs. Paris: Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
REW
: Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm 1972Romanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch, 5th edition. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1969Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Romagno, Domenica
2005Il perfetto omerico. Diatesi azionalità ruoli tematici. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah
1981Studies on the syntax of the verbal noun in Early Latin. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Rovai, Francesco
2012Between Feminine Singular and Neuter Plural: Re-Analysis Patterns. Transactions of the Philological Society 110. 94–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
2001Some basic Issues in the Grammar of Causation. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation, 1–22. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Soare, Elena
2007Morphosyntactic Mismatches Revised: The Case of Romanian Supine. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54. 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stan, Camelia
2001Supinul. In Marius Sala (ed.), Enciclopedia limbii române, 551–553. Bucarest: Univers Enciclopedic.Google Scholar
Stewart, Manson A.
1910A study in Latin abstract substantives. In Clarence L. Meader (ed.), Latin Philology, 113–178. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tekavčić, Pavao
1972Grammatica storica dell’italiano. III vol., Lessico. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna Maria
1988–89Sui ‘nomina actionis’ in italiano. PhD Dissertation, University of Pisa.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr.
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & David P. Wilkins
1993Predicting syntactic structure from semantic representations: Remember in English and Mparntwee Arrernte. In Robert D. Jr. Van Valin (ed.), Advances in Role in Reference Grammar, 499–534. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1987English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar