Ellegård and Visser reconsidered: The origins of periphrastic Do

Denison, David

doi:10.1075/cilt.41.07den

Part of

Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, April 10–13, 1985
Edited by Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem F. Koopman and Frederike van der Leek
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 41] 1985
► pp. 45–

The origins of periphrastic Do

Ellegård and Visser reconsidered

David Denison

Published online: 1 January 1985

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.41.07den

Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Order by:

Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts

2016. Parameter typology from a diachronic perspective. In Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 234], ► pp. 259 ff.

Gotthard, Lisa

2024. Subject-verb agreement and the rise of do -support in the period of anglicisation of Scots. In Keys to the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 363], ► pp. 53 ff.

Hope, By Jonathan

1990. APPLIED HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS: SOCIO‐HISTORICAL LINGUISTIC EVIDENCE FOR THE AUTHORSHIP OF RENAISSANCE PLAYS1. Transactions of the Philological Society 88:2 ► pp. 201 ff.

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott

2003. Grammaticalization,

KOMA, OSAMU

1988. The auxiliary do in eighteenth-century English: A sociohistorical-linguistic approach. By INGRID TIEKEN-BOON VAN OSTADE. (Geschiedenis van de taalkunde.) Dordrecht: Foris, 1987. Pp. x, 257. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 5:0 ► pp. 361 ff.

Roger Lass

2000. The Cambridge History of the English Language,

Lightfoot, David W.

2017. Transparency. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, ► pp. 322 ff.

Moretti, Lorenzo

2022. A multivariate analysis of causativedoand causativemakein Middle English. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 165 ff.

Moretti, Lorenzo

2023. The Functions of Auxiliary Do in Middle English Poetry: A Quantitative Study. Journal of English Linguistics 51:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

PARGMAN, SHERI

2004. GULLAHDUHAND PERIPHRASTICDOIN ENGLISH DIALECTS: ANOTHER LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE. American Speech 79:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Rissanen, Matti

2000. SYNTAX. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 187 ff.

Roberts, Ian

1995. Object Movement and Verb Movement in Early Modern English. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31], ► pp. 269 ff.

Roberts, Ian

2017. Inertia. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, ► pp. 425 ff.

Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou

2003. Syntactic Change,

von Stutterheim, Christiane & Mary Carroll

2018. Texts as answers to questions. In Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 247], ► pp. 67 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.