Part of
Identity Struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the worldEdited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Stephanie Schnurr
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 69] 2017
► pp. 79–94
Edited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Stephanie Schnurr
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 69] 2017
► pp. 79–94
Chapter 5Epistemic “Struggles”
When nurses’ expert identity is challenged by “knowledgeable” clients
This chapter examines telephone consultations between genetic nurses and new mothers whose infants have been diagnosed with the hereditary condition G6PD deficiency. These consultations aim at informing the mothers about the condition and its management. We focus on interactions with so-called “knowledgeable mothers”, in which participants’ epistemic statuses (knowledgeable nurses vs. less knowledgeable mothers) and their related identities (e.g. expert – lay person) are challenged. We examine how the participants discursively negotiate each other’s epistemic authority, while simultaneously constructing specific identities for themselves and others. We show that epistemic “struggles” become an integral part of achieving the aim of these consultations, namely that the mothers are able to manage the condition of their infants.
Keywords: epistemic status, epistemic authority, epistemic struggle, expert identity, nurses, Hong Kong Chinese, Cantonese
Article outline
- Introduction
- The roles and identities of nurses
- Data
- Establishing and orienting to participants’ epistemic statuses in the process of negotiating each other’s identities
- Discussion and conclusion
-
Note -
References
References
Candlin, Sally
2011 “Changes in Professional Identities: Nursing Roles and Practices.” In Handbook of Communication in Organizations and Professions, ed. by Christopher N. Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi, 551–570. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. 
Candlin, Christopher N., and Sally Candlin
2007 “Nursing through Time and Space: Some Challenges to the Construct of the Community of Practice.” In The Discourse of Hospital Communication: Tracing Complexities in Contemporary Health Care Organizations, ed. by Rick Iedema, 244–267. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Charles, Cathy, Amiram Gafni, and Tim Whelan
1997 “Shared Decision-making in the Medical Encounter: What Does It Mean (Or It Takes At Least Two to Tango).” Social Science and Medicine, 44 (5): 681–692.
Farhud, Dariush D., and Leila Yazdanpanah
2008 “Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency”. Iranian journal of public health, 37 (4): 1–18.
Heritage, John
2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45 (1): 1–29.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Assessment Sequences.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 68 (1): 15–38.
Ochs, Elinor
1992 “Indexing Gender.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sarangi, Srikant
2005 “The conditions and consequences of professional discourse studies.” Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2 (3): 371–394.
Walsh, Steve
2011 Exploring Classroom Discourse. Language in Action. Abingdon: Routledge.
Zayts, Olga, and Stephanie Schnurr
2014 “More than ‘information provider’ and ‘counselor’. Constructing and Negotiating Roles and Identities of Nurses in Genetic Counseling Sessions.” Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18 (3): 345–369.