Cover not available
Part of
Imagining the Peoples of Europe: Populist discourses across the political spectrum
Edited by Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 83] 2019
► pp. 149–172

Chapter 6
Building left-wing populism in Denmark

Moving far away from the right

In the Danish context, populism is usually associated with the radical right-wing. However, the left-wing Red-Green Alliance (the RGA), which defines itself as socialist, has carried out a populist turn coinciding with a remarkable electoral growth from 2.2% in 2007 to 7.8% in 2015. I argue that the RGA presents a hybrid form of left-wing populism in which socialist and populist articulations converge. The discourse is socialist since equality (or struggle against inequality) is the main value; the materialist approach is dominant; and there are plenty of references to class, working-class and class struggles. It is populist in the sense that inequality is portrayed as a conflict against the elite; and there is an attempt to constitute a new collective subject named “community”. Moreover, the RGA’s opposition towards the EU connects with the populist resistance to global neoliberalism and the defense of national sovereignty.

Keywords: left-wing populism, inequality, community, neoliberalism, discourse theory, Denmark, Red-Green Alliance (RGA)
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Radical left and the populist moment
  • Conditions for a populist left-wing party in Denmark
  • In search for the collective subject: Community
  • Against the elite
    • An alternative to the politics of necessity
    • An alternative to the European Union
  • Conclusion
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 13 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.83.07agu
References
Barr, Robert R.
2009 “Populists, Outsiders and Anti-Establishment Politics.” Party Politics 15 (1): 29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braemer, Michael
2014 “Vælgerne: EL er de mindst stuerene.” Ugebrevet A4, October 9, 2014. [URL]Google Scholar
Dragsted, Pelle
2015 “Hvordan knækker vi DF-koden?” Modkraft, July 8, 2015. [URL]Google Scholar
2016 “Frihandelskritik er ikke nationalisme.” Modkraft, November 21, 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
2017 “Globaliseringskritik er hverken nationalisme eller racisme.” Information, February 14, 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Duelund, Peter
2011 “The Impact of the New Nationalism and Identity Politics on Cultural Policymaking in Europe and Beyond.” Culture Watch Europe. [URL]
Dybvad, Kaare, Allan Andersen, Annemarie Knigge, Christina Krzyrosiak, and Karim Arfaoui
2014 “Socialdemokratiet har brug for en rød tråd.” Berlingske Tidende, April 3, 2014. [URL]Google Scholar
Errejón, Iñigo, and Chantal Mouffe
2015 Construir pueblo. Hegemonía y radicalización de la democracia. Barcelona: Icaria.Google Scholar
Frølich, Niels
2015 “ ‘Fællesskab fungerer’ eller ‘Det Danmark vi vil ha’!’ – hvad går Enhedslisten til valg på?” Kritisk Debat, April 15, 2015. [URL]Google Scholar
Gade, Steen
2017 “EU er en politisk kampplads. Kom og kæmp med, Skipper!” Information, January 14, 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Goul Andersen, Jørgen
2017 “Opbakningen til velfærdsstaten.” Samfundsøkonomen 4: 25–34.Google Scholar
Hansen, Bue Rübner
2016 “Socialdemokratisk nostalgi vil aldrig kunne bryde med velfærdschauvinismen.” Modkraft, April 20, 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Helbak, Jan
2006 “Oppositionens betingelser og muligheder.” Kritisk Debat, June 15, 2006. [URL]Google Scholar
Henriksen, Lars
2011 “En ligefrem dronning.” Kristeligt Dagblad, August 31, 2011. [URL]Google Scholar
Krakov, Rasmus
2011 “Foghs regering ændrede velfærdsstaten i det skjulte.” Videnskab.dk, October 25, 2011. [URL]Google Scholar
Lykkeberg, Rune
2008 Kampen om sandhederne. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
March, Luke
2008 “Contemporary Far Left Parties in Europe. From Marxism to the Mainstream?” International Policy Analysis. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. [URL]Google Scholar
2012 “Problems and perspectives of contemporary European radical left parties: Chasing a lost world or still a world to win?” International Critical Thought 2 (3): 314–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ed 2011 Radical Left Parties in Europe. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal
2016 “The Populist Moment.” Open Democracy, November 21, 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
Olsen, Lars
2013 En bygning slår revner. Socialdemokratiet og det folkelige Danmark. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Olsen, Theis Lange
2017 “Pia Olsen Dyhr angriber Enhedslisten: “De står sammen med Le Pen og Geert Wilders.”” DR, March 26, 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Red-Green Alliance
2014 “Programme of the Red-Green Alliance.” [URL]Google Scholar
Skipper, Pernille
2016a “EL: Opgør med nødvendighedens politik.” Altinget, July 26, 2016. [URL]Google Scholar
2016b “Valg i USA: Magteliten tabte til højrepopulismen.” [URL]
2017 “Uden venstreorienteret EU-kritik vinder højrenationalisterne.” Information, January 6, 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Giorgos Katsambekis
2014 “Left-wing populism in the European periphery: the case of SYRIZA.” Journal of Political Ideologies 19 (2): 119–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Nikos Nikisianis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, and Thomas Siomos
2017 “Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: revisiting a reified association.” Critical Discourse Studies 14 (4): 420–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorup, Mette-Line
2014 “Kan populisme bekæmpe nødvendighedens politik?” Information, July 15, 2014. [URL]Google Scholar
Trads, David
2015 “Valget er et skråt op til nødvendighedens politik.” Jyllands-Posten, June 15, 2015. [URL]Google Scholar
Tsakatika, Myrto, and Costas Eleftheriou
2013 “The Radical Left’s Turn towards Civil Society in Greece: One Strategy, Two Paths.” South European Society and Politics 18 (1): 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan, and Benjamin De Cleen
2017 “De-legitimizing labour unions: On the metapolitical fantasies that inform discourse on striking terrorists, blackmailing the government and taking hard-working citizens hostage.” Tilburg Papers in Cultural Studies 176.Google Scholar