Cover not available
Part of
Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 31–58

Certainty and uncertainty in assertive speech acts

| University of Trieste, Italy
ORCID logo | University of Trieste, Italy

We begin by considering three main philosophical accounts of assertion, showing that each emphasizes specific aspects of it while leaving others aside, and then proceed to offering a more comprehensive speech-act theoretic account of assertion, which owes much to Austin’s approach to illocutionary acts. On the basis of this account, we investigate how assertion and other members of the assertive speech act family serve the aim of communicating, not merely pieces of information, but also the speaker’s attitude of certainty or uncertainty about them. In so doing, we make use of examples from a corpus of texts in Italian and English, drawn from newspapers, scientific journals and web sites, concerning the so-called Stamina case.

Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.25.02lab
References
Austin, John L
1975 How to Do Things with Words, ed. by James O. Urmson, and Marina Sbisà. Oxford: Oxford University Press [First edition 1962]  DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 “Performative Utterances.” In Philosophical Papers, ed. by James O. 
Urmson, and Geoffrey J. Warnock, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press [First edition 1961] DOI: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
1979 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. 
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla, Claudia Caffi, and Marina Sbisà
1991 “Scalar Dimensions of Illocutionary Force.” In Speech Acts: Fiction or Reality?, ed. by Igor Žagar, 63–76. Ljubljana: IPrA.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert
1983 “Asserting.” Nous 17: 637–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1980 “Conversational Mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1984 “Modifying Illocutionary Force.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Mitchell S
2007 Self-Expression. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Assertion.” In Handbook of Pragmatics. Vol. II: Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Marina Sbisà, and Ken Turner, 387–410. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Studies in the Way of Words (1989), 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, Jennifer
2007 “Norms of Assertion.” Nous 41: 594–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, John
2003 “Future Contingents and Relative Truth.” Philosophical Quarterly 53: 321–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005a “The Assessment-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions.” In Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Vol. I, ed. by Tamara S. Gendler, and John Hawthorne, 197–233. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005b “Making Sense of Relative Truth.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “What is Assertion?” In Assertion, ed. by Jessica Brown, and Herman Cappelen, 79–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G
2005 Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pagin, Peter
2014 “Assertion.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (last version: Spring 2014 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta, URL = [URL].Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S
1934 Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 5, Pragmatism and Pragmaticism, ed. by Charles Hartshorne, and Paul Weiss. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
1984 “On Illocutionary Types.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 93–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1791–1814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “How to Read Austin.” Pragmatics 17: 461–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 Expression and Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter F
1950 “On Referring.” Mind 59: 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1964 “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts.” The Philosophical Review 73: 439–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Matthew
2005 “Must We Know What We Say?” Philosophical Review 114: 227–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy
2000 Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Witek, Maciej
2013 “Three Approaches to the Study of Speech Acts.” Dialogue and Universalism 23: 129–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Labinaz, Paolo
2023. Chapter 3. Public disagreements among health experts and their polarizing effects during a pandemic health crisis. In A Pragmatic Agenda for Healthcare [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 338], ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Jörg Meibauer
2018. The Oxford Handbook of Lying, DOI logo
Penz, Hermine
2022. Communicating climate change: how (not) to touch a cord with people and promote action. Text & Talk 42:4 ► pp. 571 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.