Jing Hao | Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
This paper examines nominalisation in scientific discourse in English, focusing on a distinction between what I
will refer to as ‘live’ and ‘dead’ grammatical metaphors. Live metaphors refer to a nominal realisation of an ideational discourse
semantic figure; dead metaphors are found in the same nominalisations as live metaphors, but they realise an entity rather than a
figure. The distinction is made by drawing on a tristratal approach that is informed by Systemic Functional Linguistics and that
considers nominalisation simultaneously from the perspectives of field, discourse semantics, and lexicogrammar. Although the paper
focuses on nominalisation, it illustrates a broader line of argumentation that can be extended to the analysis of ideational
discourse semantic meanings in general.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.Theoretical background
2.1A trinocular vision of language
2.2Grammatical metaphor
2.3Live and dead grammatical metaphor in scientific discourse
3.The data
4.Identifying the meanings of nominalisations from a tristratal perspective
4.1Looking from above
4.2Looking from around
4.2.1Interaction of nominalisations with interpersonal meanings – appraisal
4.2.2Interaction of nominalisations with textual meanings – identification
1975An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 237–272.
Campbell, Neil A. & Jane. B. Reece
2005Biology. San Francisco, CA: Pearson.
Christie, Frances & Beverly Derewianka
2008School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.
Coffin, Caroline
2006Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.
Doran, Y. J.
2017The discourse of physics: Building knowledge through language, mathematics and image. London: Routledge.
Gleason, Henry Allan Jr.
1965Linguistics and English grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gleason, Henry Allan Jr.
1968Contrastive analysis in discourse structure. (Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 21). Georgetown University Institute of Languages and Linguistics.
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K.
1998Things and relations. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), 185–235.
Halliday, M. A. K.
2007[1988]Some basic concepts of educational linguistics. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Language and education (The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Vol.9), 341–353. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin
1993Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
1999Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.
Hao, Jing
2015Construing biology: An ideational perspective. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD thesis.
Hao, Jing & Sally Humphrey
2012The role of ‘coupling’ in biological experimental reports. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 5(2). 169–194.
Hood, Susan
2010Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
1993Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (eds.), 166–202.
Martin, J. R.
2008Incongruent and proud: De-vilifying ‘nominalization’. Discourse & Society 19(6). 801–810.
Martin, J. R.
2013Systemic Functional Grammar: A next step into the theory: Axial relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Martin, J. R.
2017Revisiting field: Specialized knowledge in ancient history and biology secondary school discourse. In J. R. Martin, Karl Maton & Beatriz Quiroz (eds.), Onomázein, 111–148.
Martin, J. R. & David Rose
2007Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. New York: Continuum.
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Matruglio, Erika
2014Humanities’ humanity: Construing the social in HSC modern and ancient history, society and culture, and community and family studies. Sydney: University of Technology PhD Thesis.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & M. A. K. Halliday
1997/2009Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Kazuhiro Teruya & Marvin Lam
2010Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. Continuum.
O’Halloran, Kay L.
2005Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
Orwell, George
1946Politics and the English Language. Horizon 13(6). 252–265.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik
1972A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Ravelli, Louise
1999 [1985]Metaphor, mode and complexity: An exploration of co-varying patterns (Vol. no. 121). Nottingham: Nottingham Trent University.
Rothery, Joan
1994Exploring literacy in school English (Write it right: Resources for literacy and learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
Taverniers, Miriam
2014Grammatical metaphor and grammaticalisation: Fractal patterns in linguistic change. Paper presented at the 25th European Systemic Linguistic Conference, Université Paris Diderot, Paris.
Unsworth, Len
1997“Sound” explanations in school science: A functional linguistic perspective on effective apprenticing texts. Linguistics and Education 9(2). 199–226.
White, Peter R. R.
1998Extended reality: Protonouns and the vernacular. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), 266–296.
Wignell, Peter
2007On the discourse of social science. Darwin: Charles Darwin University Press.
Wignell, Peter, J. R. Martin & Susan Eggins
1993The discourse of geography: Ordering and explaining the experiential world. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (eds.), 151–183.
2022. Historical explanations in the Rettig Report: The role of interpersonal grammatical metaphors. Discourse & Society 33:5 ► pp. 581 ff.
Dreyfus, Shoshana & Jing Hao
2020. A multi-stratal perspective on circumstantial meaning. Journal of World Languages 6:1-2 ► pp. 27 ff.
Martin, J. R.
2020. Genre and activity: a potential site for dialogue between Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT). Mind, Culture, and Activity 27:3 ► pp. 216 ff.
Usyk, Pryimak & Siliutina
2022. The role of English linguistic terminology in modern scientific discourse. Mìžnarodnij fìlologìčnij časopis 13:1 ► pp. 14 ff.
Wang, Jiaojiao & Jiangping Zhou
2022. A Corpus-Based Study of Semantic Categorizations of Attracted Adjectives to the it BE ADJ clause Construction. SAGE Open 12:2 ► pp. 215824402210912 ff.
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. The Nominal Group in Khorchin Mongolian: A Systemic Functional Perspective. <i>WORD</i> 67:3 ► pp. 350 ff.
Zhou, Jiangping
2023. Complexity of grammatical metaphor: an entropy-based approach. Semiotica 2023:252 ► pp. 173 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.