Speculations about the Potestas Litterarum in medieval grammar (11th through 13th centuries)
The aim of this paper is to study the concept of potestas, one of the three ‘accidents’ of ‘letters’ in the Roman tradition. More specifically, it intends to examine the way in which the speculative grammarians from the 11th to the 13th centuries dealt with speech sounds and which issues were attached to it. The commentators of the beginning of this period mapped out the route to be followed in the attempt at a thorough explanation and systematization of Prisician’s adumbrations. To that purpose, they forged the successful term modus pronunciandi and classified the potestas into five types. This chapter was granted as much discussion as any other: some concepts and terminology of the Aristotelian universe were employed in it (e.g., the opposition substantial/accidental, potentiality/act). Nevertheless, some remarkable differences between the points of view of the 12th-century grammarians and those of the 13th-century have been observed, among them the interest on the part of the latter in the generation of sound. In this century, two works, the anonymous Tractatus de grammatica and John Dacus’s modistic Summa, held for different reasons a very particular position in the evolution of the doctrine on the potestas. In this respect, the influence of the former on the latter has been noticed. With their speculations all these medieval grammarians succeded in differentiating two levels within the realm of speech sounds.
References
A.Grammatical texts
Aimericus
.
Ars Lectoria Ed. by Harry F. Reijnders.
Vivarium 91.119–137 (
1971); 101.41–101 and 124–176 (1972)
Donatus Ortigraphus
Ed. by John Chittenden (=
Corpus Christianorum. Continuatio medievalis XLD). Turnholt: Brepols
1982.
Glosa ‘Promisimus’ (Prom.)
Ed. by Karin Margareta Fredborg. “
Promisimus
”.
CIMAGL 701 (
1999): 81–228 [
includes up to Prisc. gramm. II 6, 23].
Idem
Oxford, Bodleian Library,
Laud. Lat. 67 (
from Prisc. gramm. II 6, 23.)
Glosule super Priscianum (Gl.)
.
Edidit Georgius Arrivabenus de Mantua. Venetiis 1488 (e). (Another copy, Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, nouv. acq. lat 1623 (P).)
John Dacus
(JD).
Summa Grammatica Ed. by Alfred Otto.
Iohannis Daci Opera (=
Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi, 1), 45–220. Hauniae: Societas Linguae et Litterarum Danicarum
1955.
John of Genoa
.
Catholicon. Mainz
1460 (Repr., Westmead, Farnborough, Hants: Gregg International 1971.)
Papias
.
Ars grammatica.
A cura di Roberta Cervani. Bologna: Pàtron
1998.
Peter Helias
(PH).
Summa super Priscianum Ed. by Leo Reilly. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies
1993.
Priscian
.
Institutionum Grammaticarum Liber I Ed. by Martin Hertz. (=
Grammatici Latini, 2.) Leipzig: B. G. Teubner
1855 (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1961.)
Pseudo-Kilwardby (Pseudo-Kilw.)
.
The Commentary on ‘Priscianus Maior’ Ascribed to Robert Kilward by. Selected texts Ed. by Karin M. Fredborg,
N. J. Green-Pedersen,
Lauge Nielsen &
Jan Pinborg. (=
CIMAGL 15.) Copenhagen
1975.
Robert Grosseteste
.
De Generatione Sonorum Ed. by Ludwig Baur.
Die philosophishen Werke Grossetestes, 7–10 and 646–647. Münster: Aschendorff
1912.
Robert Kilwardby
(Kilw.).
Commentary on De Accentibus Ed. by P. Osmund Lewry. “
Thirteenth-Century Teaching on Speech and Accentuation: Robert Kilwardby’s Commentary on De Accentibus of Pseudo-Priscian”.
Mediaeval Studies 501.96–185 (
1988)
Roger Bacon
.
The Greek Grammar of Roger Bacon and a Fragment of his Hebrew Grammar Ed. by Edmond Nolan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
1902.
Simon
Domifex. Domus Grammaticae Ed. by Alfred Otto.
Simonis Daci Opera (=
Corpus Philosophorum Danicorum Medii Aevi, 3), 1–87. Hauniae: Societas Linguae et Litterarum Danicarum
1963.
Terentius Scaurus
.
De Orthographia Ed. by Heinrich Keil. (=
Grammatici Latini, 7), 11–35. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner
1880 (Repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms 1961.)
Tractatus de grammatica: Eine fälschlich Robert Grosseteste zugeschriebene spekulative Grammatik (Tract.)
Edition und Kommentar von Karl Reichl. München – Paderborn – Wien: Ferdinand Schöningh
1976.
William of Conches (WCh)
Glose super Priscianum. Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale, Lat. 15130 (
2nd version).
B.Secondary literature
Baur, Ludwig
1912 See Robert Grosseteste.
Burnett, Charles
1991 “
Sound and its Perception in the Middle Ages”.
The Second Sense: Studies in hearing and musical judgement from Antiquity to the 17th-century ed. by
Charles Burnett, 43–69. London: The Warburg Institute.
Bursill-Hall, Geoffrey L.
1971 Speculative Grammars of the Middle Ages. The Hague: Mouton.
Cervani, Roberta
1998 See Papias.
Covington, Michael A.
1984 Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Rijk, L. M.
1967 Logica modernorum II.1. Assen: van Gorcum & Co.
Desbordes, Françoise
1990 Idées romaines sur l’écriture. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
Dutton, Paul E. & Anneli Luhtala
1994 “
Eriugena in Priscianum”.
Mediaeval Studies 561.153–163.
Fredborg, Karin Margareta
1973 “
The Dependence of Petrus Helias’ Summa super Priscianum on William of Conches’ Glose super Priscianum
”.
CIMAGL 111.1–57.
Fredborg, Karin Margareta
Fredborg, Karin Margareta
1981 “
Some Notes on the Grammar of William of Conches”.
CIMAGL 371.21–41.
Fredborg, Karin Margareta
1988 “
Speculative Grammar”.
A History of 12th-Century Western Philosophy ed. by
Peter Dronke, 177–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fredborg, Karin Margareta
1990 “
The Priscian Commentary from the Second Half of the Twelfth Century: Ms Leiden BPL 154”.
HEL 12:2.53–68.
Fredborg, Karin Margareta
1999 “
The Promisimus
”.
Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition: Acts of the Symposium of the Copenhagen School of Medieval Philosophy Jan. 10–13, 1996 ed. by
Sten Ebbesen &
Russell Friedmann, 191–205. Copenhagen: Reitzels.
Gibson, Margaret
1979 “
The Early Scholastic Glosule to Priscian, Institutiones Grammaticae: the Text and its Influence”.
Studi medievali 3ª série 201.235–254.
Gibson, Margaret
1992 “
Milestones in the Study of Priscian, circa 800 – circa 1220”.
Viator 231.17–33.
Hunt, Richard W.
1943 “
Studies on Priscian in the 11th and 12th Centuries. I: Petrus Helias and his predecessors”.
Medieval and Renaissance Studies 1:2.194–231. (Repr. in Hunt,
The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages ed. by
Geoffrey L. Bursill-Hall, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1980.)
Hunt, Richard W.
1950 “
Studies on Priscian in the 12th century. II: The School of Ralph of Beauvais”.
Medieval and Renaissance Studies 2:1.1–56 (Repr. in Hunt,
The History of Grammar in the Middle Ages ed. by
Geoffrey L. Bursill-Hall, 39–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1980.)
Jeauneau, Édouard
1960 “
Deux rédactions des Gloses de Guillaume de Conches sur Priscian”.
Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 271.212–247.
Knepkeens, C. H.
1987 Het Iudicium Constructionis: Het leerstuk van de constructio in de 2de helft van de 12de eeuw. 41 vols. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers.
Law, Vivien
1997a [1994] “
The Study of Grammar under the Carolingians”.
Grammar and Grammarians in the Early Middle Ages by
V. Law, 129–153. London & New York: Longman.
Law, Vivien
1997b [1992] “
Carolingian Grammarians and Theoretical Innovation”.
Grammar and Grammarians in the Early Middle Ages by
V. Law, 154–163. London & New York: Longman.
Luhtala, Anneli
2000 “
Early Medieval Commentary on Priscian’s Institutiones Grammaticae
”.
CIMAGL 711.115–188.
Lusignan, Serge
1986 Parler vulgairement. Paris: J. Vrin.
Marmo, Costantino
1994 Semiotica e linguaggio nella Scolastica: Parigi, Bologna, Erfurt 1270–1330: La semiotica dei Modisti. Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medio Evo.
Percival, W. Keith
1982 “
Antonio de Nebrija and the Dawn of Modern Phonetics”.
Respublica Litterarum 51.221–232.
Percival, W. Keith
1987 “
On the Extent of Phonetic Knowledge in the Middle Ages”.
Neuere Forschungen zur Wortbildung und Historiographie der Linguistik: Festgabe für Herbert E. Brekle zum 50. Geburtstag ed. by
Brigitte Asbach-Schnitker &
Johannes Roggenhofer, 271–286. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Pérez Rodríguez, Estrella
1997 “
El concepto de littera en Nebrija: Análisis a la luz de la tradición gramatical”.
Humanismo y Pervivencia del Mundo Clásico II. Homenaje al Prof. Luis Gil ed. by
José Mª Maestre et al., 663–671. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz.
Pérez Rodríguez, Estrella
2002a “
La doctrina de Prisciano sobre la letra según sus comentaristas del s. XII”.
Actas del III Congreso Hispánico de Latín Medieval ed.
Maurilio Pérez, 661–670. León: Universidad de León.
Pérez Rodríguez, Estrella
2002b “
La Reducción de las Letras de Juan Pablo Bonet: ¿de la grafía al sonido?”.
Actas del III Congreso Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Historiografía Lingüístic ed. by
Miguel Ángel Esparza,
Benigno Fernández &
Hans-Josef Niederehe, 391–406. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Pinborg, Jan
1967 Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter. Münster: Aschendorff.
Pinborg, Jan
1982 “
Speculative Grammar”.
The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy ed. by
Norman Kretzmann,
Anthony Kenny &
Jan Pinborg, 254–269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reichl, Karl
1976 See
Tractatus de grammatica
.
Reilly, Leo
1993 See Peter Helias.
Rosier, Irène
1983 La grammaire spéculative des Modistes. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
Rosier, Irène
1993 “
Le commentaire des Glosulae et des Glosae de Guillaume de Conches sur le chapitre De voce des Institutiones Grammaticae de Priscien”.
CIMAGL 631.115–144.
Rosier-Catach, Irène
1997 “
Roger Bacon and Grammar”.
Roger Bacon and the Sciences ed. by
Jeremiah Hackett, 67–102. Leiden.: E. J. Brill.
Seeman, Khalil I.
1968 Linguistics in the Middle Ages: Phonetic studies in Early Islam. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Thurot, Charles
1869 Extraits de divers manuscrits latins pour servir à l’histoire des doctrines grammaticales au Moyen Âge. Paris: Impr. Nationale. (Repr., Frankfurt am Main: Minerva 1964.)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Amsler, M.
2006.
Linguistic Theory in the Later Middle Ages. In
Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,
► pp. 218 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.