Cover not available
Article published In:
Historiographia Linguistica
Vol. 35:1/2 (2008) ► pp.23–82

The Rise and Fall and Revival of the Ibero-Caucasian Hypothesis

| Université de Montréal

The hypothesis that the three indigenous Caucasian language stocks (Abkhaz-Adyghean, Nakh-Daghestanian, and Kartvelian) are genetically related has little support at the present day among linguists specializing in these languages. Nonetheless, the so-called ‘Ibero-Caucasian’ hypothesis had strong institutional backing in Soviet Caucasology, especially in Georgia, and continues to be invoked in certain contemporary discourses of a political and identitarian nature. In this paper the history of the Ibero-Caucasian hypothesis will be presented against the background of research into the autochthonous languages of the North and South Caucasus, and also in connection with the historiographic debate over the relation of Abkhazia to Georgia.

Published online: 7 March 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.35.1-2.05tui
References
Abuladze, Ilia
chief ed. 1963 “Grigol xandztelis cxovreba [The Life of Grigol of Xandzta]”. Dzveli kartuli agiograpiuli lit’erat’uris dzeglebi, c’igni I (V–X ss.), 248–319. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Adelung, Friedrich
1815 Catherinens der Grossen Verdienste um die vergleichende Sprachkunde. St. Petersburg: Friedrich Drechsler. (Repr., with an introd. by Harald Haarmann, Hamburg: Helmut Buske 1976.)Google Scholar
Alekseev, M. E.
2002 “Kavkazovedčeskie issledovanija v Otdele kavkazskix jazykov Instituta Jazykoznanija RAN [Research on the Caucasus at the Department of Caucasian Languages of the Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences]”. Kavkazovedeniе 11.102–119.Google Scholar
Ančabadze, Zurab V.
1964 Istorija i kul´tura drevnej Abxazii. Moscow: Nauka, Glavnaja redakcija vostočnoj literatury.Google Scholar
1976 Očerki ètničeskoj istorii abxazskogo naroda [Notes on the ethnic history of the Abkhazian people]. Suxumi: Alašara.Google Scholar
And>uladze, Nodar
1968 k’lasovani da p’irovani u>vlilebis ist’oriis zogi sak’itxi iberiul-k’avk’asiurenebši [Some questions concerning the history of class and person conjugation in the Ibero-Caucasian languages]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Ardzinba, V. G.
1979 “Nekotorye sxodnye strukturnye priznaki xattskogo i abxazo-adygskix jazykov [Some related structural characteristics of the Hattic and Abkhaz-Adyghe languages]”. Peredneasiatskij Sbornik III: Istorija i filologija stran drevnego vostoka, 26–37. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Baramidze, Aleksandre
1958 šota rustaveli: monograpiuli nark’vevi [Shota Rustaveli: Monographic essay]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Benes, Tuska
2004 “Comparative Linguistics as Ethnology: In search of Indo-Germans in Central Asia, 1770–1830”. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 24:2.117–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, John
1992 “The Dene-Caucasian Macrophylum”. Nostratic, Dene-Caucasian, Austric and Amerind ed. by Vitaly Shevoroshkin, 334–341. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. Norbert Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Bengtson, John D. & Merritt Ruhlen
1994 “Global Etymologies”. On the Origin of Languages: Studies in linguistic taxonomy, 277–336. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Berdzenišvili, Nik’o
1990 “šenišvnebni apxazetis ist’oriul ganvitarebaze [Notes on the historical development of Abkhazia]”. Sakartvelos ist’oriis sak’itxebi. masalebi sakartvelos ist’oriuligeograpiisatvis, 588–621. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Frédéric
2002 L’anthropologie soviétique des années 20–30: Configuration d’une rupture. Pessac: Presses universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Bgažba (B>ažoba), X. S.
1964 Bzybskij dialekt abxazskogo jazyka. (Issledovanie i teksty). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Bodenstedt, Friedrich
1848 Die Völker des Kaukasus and ihre Freiheits-Kämpfe gegen die Russen. Frankfurt am Main: Hermann Johann Kessler.Google Scholar
Boeder, Winfried
1994 “Identität und Universalität: Volkssprache und Schriftsprache in den Ländern des alten christlichen Orients”. Georgica 171.66–84.Google Scholar
1998 “Sprache und Identität in der Geschichte der Georgier”. Georgien im Spiegel seiner Kultur und Geschichte: Zweites Deutsch-Georgisches Symposium ed. by B. Schrade & T. Ahbe, 68–81. Berlin: Berliner Georgische Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Bokarev, E. A.
1954 “Zadači sravitel´no-istoričeskogo izučenija kavkazskix jazykov [The tasks of historical-comparative research of the Caucasian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 31.41–53.Google Scholar
Bokarev, E. A., K. V. Lomtatidze & Ju. D. Dešeriev
eds. 1967 Jazyki narodov SSSR. Vol. IV: Iberijsko-kavkazskie jazyki. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Bomhard, Allan R.
1996 Indo-European and the Nostratic Hypothesis. Charleston, N.C.: Signum.Google Scholar
Bopp, Franz
1846 “Über das Georgische in sprachverwandtschaftlicher Beziehung”. Abhandlungen der Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften; Phil.-hist. Klasse 1848.259–339.Google Scholar
1847[1842] Die kaukasischen Glieder des indoeuropäischen Stammes. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler, 83 pp. [“Gelesen in der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften am 11. December 1842.”]Google Scholar
1857, 1861 Vergleichende Grammatik des Sanskrit, Send, armenischen, griechischen, lateinischen, litauischen, altslavischen, gothischen und deutschen. Vols. II and III1. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler.Google Scholar
Borbé, Tasso
1974 “Einleitung: Zur Kritik an der Lehre Marr’s”. Kritik der marxistischen Sprachtheorie N. Ja. Marr’s ed. by Tasso Borbé, 5–20. Kronberg /Taunus: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Bouda, Karl
1949 Baskisch-kaukasische Etymologien. Heidelberg: CarlWinter.Google Scholar
Brosset, M. F.
comp. and tr. 1858 Histoire de la Géorgie depuis l’antiquité jusqu’au commencement du XIXe siecle. St. Pétersbourg: Académie Impériale des Sciences.Google Scholar
Č’araia, P.
1912 Ob otnošenii abxazskago jazyka k jafetičeskim: Materialy po jafetičeskomy jazykoznaniju [On the relationship of the Abkhaz and Japhetic languages: Materials in Japhetic linguistics]. Vol. IV1. St. Petersburg: Tipografija Imperatorskoj Akademija Nauk.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C.
1977 “Mountain of Tongues: The languages of the Caucasus”. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 61.283–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Çelebi, Evliya
1983 Kniga putešestvija: izvlečenija iz sočinenija tureckogo putešestvennika XVII veka [The book of voyages: Excerpts from the works of a Turkish explorer of the 17th century]. Vypusk III1: Zemli Zakavkaz´ja i sopredel´nyx oblastej Maloj Azii i Irana. Perevod s kommentarii. Moscow: Akademija nauk SSSR. Institut narodov Azii.Google Scholar
C’ereteli, Giorgi
1965 “Sonant’ebisa da ablaut’is teoriis gamo kartvelur enebši [About the theory of sonants and ablaut in the Kartvelian languages]”. Foreword in Gamq’relidze & Mač’avariani 1965.09–051.Google Scholar
Charachidzé, Georges
1968 Le système religieux de la Géorgie païenne: Analyse structurale d’une civilisation. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
Cherchi, Marcello & H. Paul Manning
2002 Disciplines and Nations: Niko Marr vs. his Georgian students at Tbilisi State University and the Japhetidology/Caucasology schism. (= Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies, 1603.) Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Center for Russian & East European Studies.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold
1942 saxelis pudzis udzvelesi agebuleba kartvelur enebši [The oldest structure of nominal stems in the Kartvelian languages]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
1945 zogadi enatmecniereba, II. dziritadi p’roblemebi [General linguistics, Part II. Main problems]. Tbilisi: St’alinis sax. Tbilisis saxelmc’ipo universit’et’is gamomcemloba.Google Scholar
1946 zogadi enatmecniereba, I. p’rop’edevt’ik’uli nac’ili [General linguistics, Part I. Pedagogical section]. Tbilisi: Sakartvelos SSR saxelmc’ipo gamomcemloba.Google Scholar
1948 “Kartvel´skie jazyki, ix istoričeskij sostav i drevnij lingvističeskij oblik”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 21.255–275.Google Scholar
Čikobava, A. S.
1951 “Vystuplenie”. Sessija Otdelenij Obščestvennyx Nauk Akademii Nauk SSSR, posvjaščennaja godovščine opublikovanija genial´nogo proizvedenija I. V. Stalina ‘Marksizm i voprosy jazikoznanija’. Sbornik materialov, 168–171. Moscow: Akademija Nauk SSSRGoogle Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold
1953a “Gramat’ik’uli k’las-k’at’egoria da zmnis u>vlilebis zogi sak’itxi dzvelkartulši” [Grammatical class and some questions concerning verb conjugation in Old Georgian]. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 51.51–63.Google Scholar
1953b “Et’imologia dzveli kartuli t’erminebisa b>uari, samxari [The etymology of the Old Georgian terms “b>uari”, “samxari” [south]]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 51.65–71.Google Scholar
1954 “Mravalobitis supiksta genezisatvis kartulši [On the genesis of the Georgian plural suffixes]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 61.67–76.Google Scholar
Čikobava, A. S.
1955a “O dvux osnovnyx voprosax izučenija iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykov [On two basic problems in the study of the Ibero-Caucasian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 61.66–92.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold
1955b “P. Uslar i voprosy naučnogo izučenija gorskix iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykov [P. Uslar and the questions of the study of the highland Ibero-Caucasian languages]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 71.461–471.Google Scholar
Čikobava (Tschikobawa), Arn
1959 “Die ibero-kaukasischen Gebirgssprachen und der heutige Stand ihrer Erforschung in Georgien”. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae 9:2.109–162.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold
1965 iberiul-k’avk’asiur enata šesc’avlis ist’oria [The history of the study of the Ibero-Caucasian languages]. Tbilisi: Ganatleba.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arn
1970 “K voprosy ob otnošenii kartvel´skix jazykov k indoevropejskim i severokavkazskim jazykam [On the relationship between the Kartvelian languages with the Indo-European and North-Caucasian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1970:2.50–62.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold
1979 iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecnierebis šesavali [Introduction to Ibero-Caucasian linguistics]. Tbilisi: TSU gamomcemloba.Google Scholar
1985 “Kogda i kak èto bylo [When and how it happened]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecnierebis c’elic’deuli 121.9–52.Google Scholar
1989 “Kategorija grammatičeskix klassov v istorii kartvel´skix jazykov”. Kategorija grammatičeskix klassov v iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykax ed. by K. V. Lomtatidze, 3–10. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Chirikba, Vjacheslav
1998 “Origin of the Abkhazian People”. The Abkhazians: A handbook ed. by B. George Hewitt, 37–47. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Čit’aia, Giorgi
2001 [1926] “kartuli etnologia (1917–1926 [Georgian ethnology (1917–1926)]”. šromebi xut t’omad. T’omi III: XX s. kartuli etnograpia, savele-etnograpiuli dziebani, metodologia, 21–32. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
2000 [1946] “šesavali sakartvelos etnograpiisatvis [Introduction to the ethnography of Georgia]. šromebi xut t’omad. t’omi II. kartveli xalxis etnogenezi da k’ult’urul-ist’oriuli p’roblemebi, 9–30. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
2001 [1968] “kartuli sabč’ota etnograpia (1930–1968) [Georgian Soviet ethnography (1930–1968)]”. šromebi xut t’omad. t’omi III. XX s. kartuli etnograpia, savele-etnograpiuli dziebani, metodologia, 53–73. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
2000 [1975] “Ivane Javaxišvili da sakartvelos etnograpia [Ivane Javaxišvili and the ethnography of Georgia]”. šromebi xut t’omad. t’omi II. kartveli xalxis etnogenezi da k’ult’urul-ist’oriuli p’roblemebi, 64–87. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Colarusso, John
1989 “Proto-Northwest Caucasian (or How to crack a very hard nut)”. NonSlavic languages of the USSR: Linguistic studies ed. by Howard I. Aronson, 20–55. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981 The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Winfried Boeder, George Hewitt & Helma van den Berg
2003 “Caucasian languages”. Lingua 1151.1–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deeters, Gerhard
1926–1927 “Armenisch und Südkaukasisch: Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Sprachmischung”. Caucasica 31.1–37, 41.32–64.Google Scholar
1955 “Gab es Nominalklassen in allen kaukasischen Sprachen?” Corolla Linguistica. Festschrift F. Sommer, 26–33. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, Igor M. & Sergej A. Starostin
1986 Hurro-Urartian as an East Caucasian Language. München: Kitzinger.Google Scholar
Dirr, Adolf
1928 Einführung in das Studium der kaukasischen Sprachen, mit einer Sprachenkarte. Leipzig: Verlag der Asia Major.Google Scholar
D’Istria, Dora
1860 Les femmes en Orient. Vol. II: La Russie. Zurich: Meyer & Zeller.Google Scholar
Dodašvili, Rusudan
1962 Mari Brose: kartuli mc’erlobis mk’vlevari [Marie Brosset: Scholar of Georgian literature]. Tbilisi: Sabč’ota Sakartvelo.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges
1933a Introduction à la grammaire comparée des langues caucasiennes du nord. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
1933b Recherches comparatives sur le verbe caucasien. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
1937 “Morphologie comparée et phonétique comparée: à propos des langues caucasiennes du nord”. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 381.122–138.Google Scholar
Dunaevskaja, I. M. & D´jakonov, I. M.
1979 “Xattskij (protoxettskij) jazyk”. Jazyki Azii i Afriki, III: Jazyki drevnej perednej Azii (nesemitskie), Iberijsko-Kavkazskie jazyki, Paleoaziatskie jazyki ed. by G. D. Sanžeev, 79–83. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Džaparidze, Otar
1989 Na zare etnokul´turnoj istorii Kavkaza. Tbilisi: Tbilisi State University Press.Google Scholar
Dzidziguri, Šota
1985 Nik’o Mari: kartuli k’ult’uris mk’vlevari [Niko Marr: Scholar of Georgian culture]. Tbilisi: MecnierebaGoogle Scholar
Fähnrich, Heinz
1991 “Kartwelisch-drawidische Sprachparallelen”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 44:3.339–343.Google Scholar
Furnée, Edzard J.
1979 Vorgriechisch-Kartvelisches: Studium zum ostmediterranen Subtrat nebst einem Versuch zu einer neuen pelasgischen Theorie. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
1982 Beiträge zur georgischen Etymologie. Faszikel 1: Georgisch-vorgriechische, georgisch-vorromanische und georgisch-vorindogermanische Materialien. Leuven: PeetersGoogle Scholar
Gabelentz, Hans Conon von der
1861 “Über das Passivum: Eine sprachvergleichende Abhandlung”. Abhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, vol. VIII1, 449–546. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Gamq’relidze, T[amaz] and G[ivi] Mač’avariani
1965 sonant’ta sist’ema da ablaut’i kartvelur enebši: saerto-kartveluri st’rukt’uris t’ip’ologia [The system of sonants and ablaut in the Kartvelian languages: A typology of Common Kartvelian]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba. [Annotated German translation by Winfried Boeder, Sonantensystem und Ablaut in den Kartwelsprachen. Tübingen: Günter Narr, 1982.]Google Scholar
Gamq’relidze, T. V.
1971 “Sovremennaja diaxroničeskaja lingvistika i kartvel´skie jazyki”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1971:21.19–30 (part I); 31.34–48 (part II).Google Scholar
1991a “K probleme istoriko-ètimologičeskogo osmyslenija ètnonimii drevnej Kolxidy: K istorii termina apxaz-//abazg- [On the problem of the historico-etymological meaning of the ethnonyms of ancient Colchis: On the history of the term abxaz-// abazg ]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1991:4.89–95.Google Scholar
1991b “On the History of the Tribal Names of Ancient Colchis” Revue des Études Géorgiennes et Caucasiennes 6–7.237–245. [Translation by Brian George Hewitt.]Google Scholar
Gamsaxurdia, Zviad
1990 Sakartvelos sulieri missia. Tbilisi: Ganatleba. [English translation: The Spiritual Mission of Georgia. Tbilisi: Ganatleba 1991.]Google Scholar
1994 ra aris čveni sicocxle? brŠola! [What is our life? Struggle!]. Tbilisi: Aprasidze.Google Scholar
Gesner, Conrad
1555 Mithridates: De differentiis linguarum tum veterum tum quæ hodie apud diversas nationes in toto orbe terrarum in usu sunt. Zürich: Froschoverus.Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost
1992 “The Caucasian Language Material in Evliya Çelebi’s Travel Book: A revision”. Caucasian Perspectives ed. by Brian George Hewitt, 8–62. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Gordadzé, Thorniké
2000 “Moral´no-ideologičeskie prepjastvija k uregulirovaniju gruzinoabxazskogo konflikta [The moral and ideological obstacles to the settlement of the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict]”. Aspekty gruzino-abxazskogo konflikta 21.51–65. Irvine: University of California-Irvine.Google Scholar
2001 “La Géorgie et ses hôtes ingrats: Conflits politiques autour de l’autochtonie”. Critique Internationale 101.161–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordeziani, Rismag
1980 et’rusk’uli da kartveluri. Tbilisi: TSU Press.Google Scholar
1985 c’inaberdznuli da kartveluri. Tbilisi: TSU Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph
2000 Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives: The Eurasiatic language family. Volume I: Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gudava, T’ogo
1964 “Regresuli dezaprik’at’izaciis erti šemtxveva zanurši (megrul-č’anurši) [A case of regressive deaffricatization in Zan (Mingrelian-Laz)]”. Sakartvelos SSR Mecnierebata Ak’ademiis Moambe 33:2.497–503.Google Scholar
Güldenstädt, Johann Anton
1787, 1791 Reisen durch Russland und im Caucasischen Gebürge. 21 vols. St. Petersburg: Kayserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
1834 Beschreibung der Kaukasischen Länder. Aus seinen Papieren gänzlich ungearbeitet, verbessert herausgegeben und mit erklärenden Anmerkungen begleitet von Julius Klaproth. Berlin: Verlag der Stuhrschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Gulya, Janos
1974 “Some Eighteenth Century Antecedents of Nineteenth Century Linguistics: The discovery of Finno-Ugrian”. Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and paradigms ed. by Dell Hymes, 258–276. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gvanceladze, Teimuraz, Manana T’abidze, Revaz Šerozia, Revaz Č’ant’uria
2001 “>vtismsaxurebisa da sasuliero ganatlebis ena, rogorc rusipik’at’oruli p’olit’ik’is ganxorcielebis sašualeba [The language of liturgy and religious instruction, as a means of carrying out a policy of Russification]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 51.89–116.Google Scholar
Gvanceladze, Teimuraz
2004 “Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enata ojaxis šemadgenlobisatvis [On the composition of the Ibero-Caucasian language family]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 81.67–75.Google Scholar
Haßler, Gerda
2004 “Typologie und Anthropologie bei Lorenzo Hervás y Panduro”. Tintemann & Trabant, eds. 2004.89–100.Google Scholar
Hervás (y Panduro), Lorenzo
1784 Catalogo delle lingue conosciute, et notizia della loro affinità e diversità. Cesena: Gregorio Biasini.Google Scholar
Hervás y Panduro, Lorenzo
1787a Idea dell’Universo, vol. XX: Vocabolario poligloto, con prolegomeni sopra più di CL lingue. Dove sono scoperte nuove, ed utili all’Antica storia dell’uman genere, ed alla cognizione del meccanismo delle parole. Cesena: Gregorio Biasini.Google Scholar
1787b Idea dell’Universo, vol. XXI: Saggio pratico delle lingue, con prolegomeni e una raccolta di orazioni dominicali in più di CCC lingue e dialetti. Cesena: Gregorio Biasini.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B[rian] G[eorge]
1981 “Caucasian Languages”. Comrie, ed. 1981.196–237.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. G.
1991 “The Valid and Non-valid Application of Philology to History”. Revue des Études Géorgiennes et Caucasiennes 6/71.247–263.Google Scholar
2005 “North West Caucasian”. Lingua 1151.91–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imart, G.
1968 “Uslar et la phonologie”. Linguistique 4:1.31–42.Google Scholar
Ingoroq’va, P’avle
1954 giorgi merčule: kartveli mc’erali meate sauk’unisa [Giorgi Merčule: A Georgian writer of the 10th century]. Tbilisi: Sabč’ota mc’erali.Google Scholar
1963 “rustveliani”. Txzulebata k’rebuli, I. t’omi, 1–252. Tbilisi: Sabč’ota sakartvelo.Google Scholar
Jakovlev, N. F.
1949 “Izučenie jafetičeskix jazykov Severnogo Kavkaza za sovetskij period [Study of the Japhetic languages of the Northern Caucasus in the Soviet period]”. Jazyki Severnogo Kavkaza i Dagestana. Sbornik lingvističeskix issledovanij ed. by I. I. Meščaninov & G. P. Serd´jučenko, 296–315. Moscow: Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Janašia, Simon
1940 “čerkezuli (adi>euri) element’i sakartvelos t’op’onimik’aši [The Circassian [Adyghe] element in the toponyms of Georgia]”. Mecnierebata ak’ademiis moambe I:8.623–627]. (Reprinted in his Šromebi III1 [1959]: 117–123.)Google Scholar
1942 “svanur-adi>euri enobrivi šexvedrebi [Svan-Adyghe linguistic contacts]”. ENIMK’-is moambe 121.249–278. (Reprinted in his Šromebi III1 [1959]: 81–116.)Google Scholar
Japaridze, Metropolitan Anania et al.
2005 “ ‘… an č’k’viani mt’eria, an ugnuri moq’vare’: sakartvelos sap’at’riarkostan arsebuli kartuli enisa da k’ult’iris samecniero sabč’os >ia c’erili [‘He’s either a clever enemy or a stupid friend’: An open letter by the ‘Scientific council on the Georgian language and culture’ of the Patriarchate of Georgia]”. Posted at mamuli.net 5 December 2005.Google Scholar
Javaxišvili, Ivane
1992 [1937] [kartveli eris ist’oriis šesavali, c’igni meore:] kartuli da k’avk’asiuri enebis tavdap’irveli buneba da natesaoba [(Introduction to the History of the Georgian People, Book II:) The original nature and relation of the Georgian and Caucasian languages]. (= Txzulebani, 10.) Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
1950 kartveli eris ist’oriis šesavali, c’igni p’irveli: sakartvelos, k’avk’asiisa da maxlobeli a>mosavletis ist’oriul-etnologiuri p’roblemebi [Introduction to the History of the Georgian People, Book I: Historical and ethnological problems concerning Georgia, the Caucasus and the Near East]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
1960 Kartveli eris ist’oria [The history of the Georgian people]. Volume I1, 5th ed. Tbilisi: Tbilisi State University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Stephen
2004 “The Role of Cultural Paradigms in Georgian Foreign Policy”. Ideology and National Identity in Post-Communist Foreign Policies ed. by Rick Fawn, 83–110. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Kakabadze, S. S.
1955 “O tak nazyvaemyx ‘xettsko-iberijskix’ jazykax [On the so-called ‘HatticIberian’ languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 41.65–72.Google Scholar
K’ak’abadze, Sargis
1966 rustaveli da misi vepxist’q’aosani [Rustaveli and his ‘Knight in the Leopard’s Skin’]. Tbilisi: Ganatleba.Google Scholar
Kaltz, Barbara
2004 “ ‘Deutsche gründliche Kritik’: Christian Jacob Kraus zu Pallas’ Vergleichendem Glossarium aller Sprachen ”. Tintemann & Trabant, eds. 2004.181–197.Google Scholar
Karst, Joseph
1931 Origines Mediterraneae: Die vorgeschichtlichen Mittelmeervölker nach Ursprung, Schichtung und Verwandtschaft. Ethnologisch-linguistische Forschungen über Euskaldunak (Urbasken), Alarodier und Proto-Phrygen, Pyrenaeo-Kaukasier und Atlanto-Ligurer, West- und Ostiberer, Liguro-Leleger, Etrusker und Pelasger, Tyrrhener, Lyder und Hetiter. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kavtaradze, Giorgi
1985 anatoliaši kartvelur t’omta gansaxlebis sak’itxisatvis [On the issue of the settlement of Georgian tribes in Anatolia]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Kholbaia, Vakhtang, Raphiel Gelantia, David Latsuzbaia & Teimuraz Chakhrakia
1999 Labyrinth of Abkhazia. Translated and adapted by Nana Japaridze-Chkoidze. Tbilisi: Parliament of Georgia. [Text available on-line at [URL]]
Khoshtaria-Brosset, Edisher
1997 History and Today: The Abkhazian problem in the light of conflict studies. Tbilisi: International Center on Conflict & Negotiation.Google Scholar
K itogam
1956 “K itogam diskussii o ‘xettsko-iberijskom’ jazykovom edinstve [On the results of the discussion on the ‘Hattic-Iberian’ linguistic unity]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1956:11.68–73.Google Scholar
Klaproth, Julius von
1812, 1814a Reise in den Kaukasus and Georgien unternommen in den Jahren 1807 and 1808 auf Veranstaltung der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu St. Petersburg. Enthaltend eine vollständige Beschreibung der kaukasischen Länder und ihrer Bewohner. 21 vols. Halle & Berlin: Buchhandlung des Hallischen Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
1814b Kaukasische Sprachen. Anhang zur Reise in den Kaukasus und nach Georgien. Halle & Berlin: Buchhandlung des Hallischen Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
1826 Mémoires relatifs à l’Asie. Paris: Dondey-Dupré.Google Scholar
1827 Tableau historique, géographique, ethnographique et politique du Caucase et des provinces limitrophes entre la Russie et la Perse. Paris: Ponthieu et Cie.Google Scholar
Klaproth, Julius
1831 Asia polyglotta. 2nd ed. Paris: Heideloff & Campe.Google Scholar
Klimov, G. A.
1964 Etimologičeskij slovar´ kartvel´skix jazykov. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
1968 “O gipoteza vnutrennogo rodstva kavkazskix jazykov [On the hypothesis of the inner kinship of the languages of the Caucasus]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1968:6.16–25.Google Scholar
1969 Die kaukasische Sprachen. Transl. by Winfried Boeder. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
1970 “O vnešnix svjazjax kartvel´skix jazykov [On the external links of the Kartvelian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1970:6.36–45.Google Scholar
1973 “Kavkazskie (iberijsko-kavkazskie) jazyki [Caucasian (Ibero-Caucasian) languages]”. Bol´šaja Sovetskaja Ènciklopedia, 3rd ed., vol. XI1, 121–122. Moscow: Naučnoe izdatel´stvo Bol´šaja Sovetskaja Ènciklopedia.Google Scholar
1984 “Opyt stratifikacii kartvel´skix indoevropeizmov [Explorations of the stratification of Kartvelian Indo-Europeanisms]”. Ètimologija 1984.85–89.Google Scholar
1986a Vvedenie v kavkazskoe jazykoznanie. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
1986b “Problems of Caucasian areal linguistics”. Aspects of Language: Studies in honour of Mario Alinei. Volume I: Geolinguistics. Papers presented to Mario Alinei by his friends and colleagues of the Atlas Linguarum Europae on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 123–131. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1991 “Some Thoughts on Indo-European-Kartvelian Relations”. Journal of IndoEuropean Studies 191.325–348.Google Scholar
1994 “Kartvelian Evidence for the Indo-European Laryngeal?”. Indogermanische Forschungen 991.62–71.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Aert
1963 “Caucasian”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. I1: Soviet and East European Linguistics, 315–344. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
K’varacxelia, G. & V. Šengelia
1998 arnold čikobavas dabadebis 100 c’listavisadmi midz>vnili saertašoriso simp’oziumis masalebi [Materials from an international symposium in honor of Arnold Čikobava’s 100th anniversary]. Tbilisi: Kartuli ena.Google Scholar
Lafon, René
1929 “Quelques rapprochements entre les langues caucasiques septentrionales et les langues kartvèles”. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 291.138–152.Google Scholar
Law, Vivien
1998 “Language Myths and the Discourse of Nation-Building in Georgia”. NationBuilding in the Post-Soviet Borderlands: The politics of national identities ed. by Graham Smith, Vivien Law, Andrew Wilson et al., 167–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von
1989a [1768] “Epistola ad Andream Acoluthum. Hanovera 10. Octobr. 1695”. Opera omnia, studio Ludovici Dutens, tomus sextus, 138–140. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm
1989b [1768] “Desiderata Circa Linguas Populorum, ad Dn. Podesta, Interpretem Caesareum Transmissa”. Opera omnia, studio Ludovici Dutens, tomus sextus, 228–230. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Leont’i Mroveli
1955 Kartlis cxovreba, I. cxovreba kartvelta mepeta [The Georgian Chronicles, I. The lives of the Georgian kings]. Ed. by Simon Q’auxčišvili. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Leščak, Oleg & Jurij Sitko
2005 “Les considérations onto-gnoséologiques de Marr du point de vue de la méthodologie pragmatico-fonctionnelle”. Sériot, ed. 2005a.177–198.Google Scholar
Lomtatidze, K. V.
1955 “Nekotorye voprosy iberijsko-kavkazskogo jazykoznanija [Some questions of Ibero-Caucasian linguistics]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 41.73–82.Google Scholar
, red. 1989 Kategorija grammatičeskix klassov v iberijsko-kavkazskix jazykax. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Mač’avariani, Givi
1966 “K tipologičeskoj xarakteristike obščekartvel´skogo jazyka-osnovy [On the typological characteristics of the Kartvelian protolanguage]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1966:1.1–9.Google Scholar
Machavariani, Givi
1970 “The System of the Ancient Kartvelian Nominal Flection as Compared to those of the Mountain Caucasian and Indo-European Languages”. Theoretical problems of typology and the northern Eurasian languages ed. by László Dezső & Petar Hajdu, 165–169. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Mač’avariani, Givi
2002 kartvelur enata šedarebiti gramat’ik’a [Comparative grammar of the Kartvelian languages]. Tbilisi: Tbilisis universit’et’is gamomcemloba.Google Scholar
Manaster-Ramer, Alexis
1995 “On ‘Some Thoughts on Indo-European-Kartvelian Relations’”. Journal of Indo-European Studies 231.195–208.Google Scholar
Marr, N. Ja.
1908 “Predvaritel´noe soobščenie o rodstve gruzinskogo jazyka s semitičeskimi [Preliminary communication on the kinship of the Georgian language with Semitic]”. Marr 1933.23–38.Google Scholar
1910 Grammatika čanskago (lazskago) jazyka [Grammar of the Chan (Laz) language]. (= Materialy po jafetičeskomy jazykoznaniju, 2.) St. Petersburg: Tipografija Imperatorskoj Akademija Nauk.Google Scholar
1912 K voprosu o položenii abxazskago jazyka sredi jafetičeskix [On the question of the place of the Abhhaz language within the Japhetic languages]. (= Materialy po jafetičeskom, 5.) St. Petersburg: Tipografija Imperatorskoj Akademija Nauk.Google Scholar
1916 “Kavkazovedenie i abxazskij jazyk [Caucasian and the Abkhaz language]”. Marr 1933.59–78.Google Scholar
1920 “Jafetičeskij Kavkaz i tretij ètničeskij èlement v sozidanii Sredizemnomorskoj kul´tury [The Japhetic Caucasus and the third ethnic element in the creation of the Mediterranean culture]”. Marr 1933.79–124.Google Scholar
1927a “Iz Pirinejskoj Gurii (K voprosy o metode) [From Pyrenean Guria (On the question of method)]”. (= Izvestija kavkazskogo istoriko-arxeologičeskogo instituta, V.1–62.) Moscow.Google Scholar
1927b “Predislovie k Jafetičeskomu Sborniku, tom V [Foreword to the Japhetic anthology, vol. V]”. Marr 1933.249–253.Google Scholar
1930 “Abxazskij jazyk”. Literaturnaja Ènciklopedia I1, 18–23. Moscow: Izd. Kom. Akad.Google Scholar
1931 “Jafetičeskie jazyki”. Bol´šaja Sovetskaja Ènciklopedia LXV1, 827–849. Moscow: Sovetskaja Ènciklopedia. [1st ed.]Google Scholar
1933 Izbrannye raboty. Tom I: Ètapy razvitija jafetičeskoj teorija. Leningrad, Izdat. GAIMK.Google Scholar
Melikišvili, Giorgi
1959 K istorii drevnej Gruzii [On the history of Old Georgian]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Müller, Friedrich
1887 Grundriss der Sprachwissenschaft. III1. Band: Die Sprachen der lockenhaarigen Rassen. Wien: Alfred Hölder.Google Scholar
Müller, F[riedrich] Max
1854 Suggestions for the Assistance of Officers in Learning the Languages of the Seat of War in the East. London: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Nazarov, Vladimir P.
1974 “Der gegenwärtige Stand der Erforschung der kaukasischen Sprachen”. Kritik der marxistischen Sprachtheorie N. Ja. Marr’s ed. by Tasso Borbé, 21–61. Kronberg/Taunus: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1986 “Head-Marking and Dependent-Marking Grammar”. Language 62:1.56–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 “Nikolayev & Starostin’s North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary and the Methodology of Long-Range Comparison”. Paper presented at the 10th Conference on the Non-Slavic Languages of the ex-USSR (NSL 10), University of Chicago, 10 May 1997.
2003 “The Nakh-Daghestanian Consonant Correspondences”. Current trends in Caucasian, East European, and Inner Asian linguistics: Papers in honor of Howard I. Aronson ed. by Dee Ann Holisky & Kevin Tuite, 207–251. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolayev, S. L. & S. A. Starostin
1994 A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary. Moscow: Asterisk.Google Scholar
Nikol´skij, V. K. & N. F. Jakovlev
1949 “Osnovnye položenija materialističeskogo učenija N. Ja. Marra o jazyke [Foundations of the materialistic teaching of N. Ja. Marr concerning language]”. Voprosy filosofii 11.265–285.Google Scholar
Öhrig, Bruno
2000 “Adolf Dirr (1867–1930): Ein Kaukasus-Forscher am Münchner Völkerkundemuseum”. Münchner Beiträge zur Völkerkunde 61.199–234.Google Scholar
Oniani, Aleksandre
1978 kartvelur enata ist’oriuli morpologiis sak’itxebi [Issues in Georgian historical morphology]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Google Scholar
Oniani, A. L.
1985 “O grammatičeskoj kategorii klassa v kartvel´skix jazykax [On the grammatical category of class in the Kartvelian languages]”. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1985:3.67–76.Google Scholar
Oniani, Aleksandre
1989 kartvelur enata šedarebiti gramat’ik’is sak’itxebi: saxelta morpologia [Issues in the comparative grammar of the Kartvelian languages: Nominal morphology]. Tbilisi: Ganatleba.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger
1983 [1916] A Glance at the History of Linguistics, with particular regard to the historical study of phonology. Translated from the Danish by Caroline C. Henriksen; edited with an introduction by Konrad Koerner. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pictet, Adolphe
1859 Les origines indo-européennes, ou les Aryas primitifs: Essai de paléontologie linguistique. Vol. I1. Paris: Joël Cherbuliez.Google Scholar
Potocki, Jean
1829 Voyage dans les steppes d’Astrakhan et du Caucase. Paris: Merlin.Google Scholar
Pott, August Friedrich
1856 Die Ungleichheit menschlicher Rassen hauptsächlich vom sprachwissenschaftlichen Standpunkte, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von des Grafen von Gobineau gleichnamigem Werke. Lemgo & Detmold: Meyer.Google Scholar
Put’k’aradze, T’ariel
2001 “>vtismsaxurebis ena “q’ovelta kartvelta” ertianobis gamsaz>vreli ert-erti mtavari pakt’ori. samc’ignobro enisa da dialekt’ta mimartebis sak’itxisatvis [The liturgical language as one of the chief defining elements of the unity of “All Georgians”: On the question of the relation between a literary language and its dialects]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 51.227–241.Google Scholar
2002 “kartvelebi, zogadkartuli samc’ignobro ena da kartvelta dialekt’ebi [The Georgians, the Common-Georgian literary language and the Georgians’ dialects]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 61.187–203.Google Scholar
2003 “monatesave enobriv erteulta k’valipik’aciis sak’itxisatvis tanamedrove mecnierebaši [On the question of the qualification of related linguistic units in contemporary science]”. Kartveluri memk’vidreoba 71.206–227.Google Scholar
2005 kartvelebi. ist’oriuli sacxovrisi, dedaena, dialekt’ebi. nac’ili I: krist’ianobamdeli ep’oka [The Georgians: Historical homeland, mother tongue, dialects. Part I: Pre-Christian period]. Kutaisi: Kutaisi State University Dialectology Research Institute.Google Scholar
Rask, Rasmus
1826 Über das Alter und die Echtheit der Zend-Sprache und des Zend-Avesta, und Herstellung des Zend-Alphabets; nebst einer Übersicht des gesammten Sprachstammes. Transl. by Friedrich Heinrich von der Hagen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Rogava, Giorgi
1952 “kartvelur enata ponet’ik’is ist’oriul-šedarebiti šesc’avlis dziritadi sak’itxebi [Basic issues in the historical-comparative study of the phonetics of the Kartvelian languages]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 41.35–51.Google Scholar
1954 “iberiul-k’avk’asiur enata saerto k’utvnilebis tesvis a>mnišvneli pudze [The common Ibero-Caucasian root meaning ‘to sow’]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 61.51–53.Google Scholar
Sanžeev, G. D.
ed. 1979 Jazyki Azii i Afriki. III: Jazyki drevnej perednej Azii (nesemitskie), Iberijsko-Kavkazskie jazyki, Paleoaziatskie jazyki. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Šaradzenidze, Tinatin
1955 “brunvata k’lasipik’aciisatvis svanurši [On the classification of Svan declension]”. Iberiul-k’avk’asiuri enatmecniereba 71.125–135Google Scholar
Sarĵveladze, Zurab, K’orneli Danelia & Elguĵa Giunašvili
eds. 1986 Iak’ob Xucesi “Šušanik’is c’ameba”, Giorgi Merčule “Grigol Xandztelis cxovreba”, sask’olo gamocema gamocema [“The Martyrdom of Shushanik” by Iakob Xucesi, and “The Life of Grigol of Xandzta” by Giorgi Merchule. School edition]. Tbilisi: Ganatleba.Google Scholar
Schiefner, Anton
1854 “Kurze Charakteristik der Thusch-Sprache”. Mélanges asiatiques tirés du Bulletin historico-philologique de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St-Pétersbourg 21.402–426.Google Scholar
1856 Versuch über die Thusch-Sprache; oder, Die khistische Mundart in Thuschetien. St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Karl Horst
1962 Studien zur Rekonstruktion des Lautstandes der südkaukasischen Grundsprache. (= Abhandlung für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 34:3), 1–160. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo
1896 “Über den passiven Charakter des Transitivs in den kaukasischen Sprachen”. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Classe der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1331.1–91.Google Scholar
1912, 1914 “Zur methodischen Erforschung der Sprachverwandschaft (Nubisch und Baskisch)”. Revue Internationale des Etudes Basques 61.267–281; 81.389–396.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang
1987 Review of Diakonoff & Starostin (1986). Kratylos 321.154–159.Google Scholar
Schulze[-Fürhoff], Wolfgang
1992 “Zur Entwicklungsdynamik morphosyntaktischer Subsysteme: Die ostkaukasische Klassenzeichen”. Caucasologie und mythologie comparée ed. by Catherine Paris, 335–362. Louvain & Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang
1997 Review of Nikolayev & Starostin (1994). Diachronica 14:1.149–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Person, Klasse, Kongruenz. Fragmente einer Kategorialtypologie des einfachen Satzes in den ostkaukasischen Sprachen. Band I: Die Grundlagen. München & Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2001 “Die kaukasischen Sprachen”. La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques ed. by Martin Haspelmath et al., Tome I1, 1774–1796. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005 “Grammars for East Caucasian”. Anthropological Linguistics 47.3: 321–352.Google Scholar
Sériot, Patrick
1993 “La double vie de Troubetzkoy, ou la clôture des systèmes”. Le Gré des langues 51.88–115. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
ed. 2005a Un paradigme perdu: La linguistique marriste. (= Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique et des Sciences du Langage, 20.) Lausanne: Université de Lausanne.Google Scholar
2005b “Si Vico avait lu Engels, il s’appellerait Nicolas Marr”. Sériot, ed. 2005a.227–254.Google Scholar
Shamba, Giorgi
1998 “On the Track of Abkhazia’s Antiquity”. The Abkhazians: A handbook ed. by B. G. Hewitt, 48–58. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Slodzian, Monique
2005 “Actualité de Marr, ou permanence de l’utopie”. Sériot, ed. 2005a.271–293.Google Scholar
Smeets, Rieks
1989 “On Hurro-Urartian as Eastern Caucasian language”. Bibliotheca Orientalis 461.259–279.Google Scholar
Stalin, Joseph
1972 [1951] Marxism and Problems of Linguistics. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Strahlenberg, Philip Johan von
1730 Das Nordund Östliche Theil von Europa und Asia, in so weit solches das gantze Russische Reich mit Sibirien und der grossen Tatarey in sich begriffet. Stockholm: In Verlegung des Autoris.Google Scholar
Tintemann, Ute
2004 “ Asia Polyglotta: Zu den Sprachstudien von Julius Heinrich Klaproth”. Tintemann & Trabant, eds. 2004.199–214.Google Scholar
Tintemann, Ute & Jürgen Trabant
eds. 2004 Sprache und Sprachen in Berlin um 1800. (= Berliner Klassik – eine Grossstadtkultur um 1800, 3.) Hannover-Laatzen: Wehrhahn.Google Scholar
Tiškov, V. A.
chief ed. 1994 Narody Rossij: Ènciklopedija. Moscow: Naučnoe izdatel´stvo Bol´šaja Rossijskaja Ènciklopedia.Google Scholar
Trabant, Jürgen
2004 “Mithridates in Berlin”. Tintemann & Trabant, eds. 2004.141–159.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R.
1997 Aryans and British India. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2001 “The Whole History of Kinship Terminology in Three Chapters: Before [Lewis Henry] Morgan, Morgan, and after Morgan”. Anthropological Theory 1:2.268–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S.
1987 [1930] “Severnokavkazskie slovarnye sopostavlenija”. Izbrannye trudy po filologii. Moscow: Progress, 271–282. [Russian translation, with annotations by Sergej Starostin, of “Nordkaukasische Wortgleichungen”, Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 37:2: 79–92.]Google Scholar
1934 Review of Georges Dumézil, Études comparatives sur les langues caucasiennes du Nord-Ouest (Paris: Adrien Maisonneuve 1932) and Dumézil (1933b) Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 101.629–635.Google Scholar
Tseretheli, М
1913–1916 “Sumerian and Georgian: A study in comparative philology”. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 451.783–821; 461.1–36; 471.255–288; 481.1–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuite, Kevin
2003 “Explorations in the Ideological Infrastructure of Indo-European Studies”. Historiographia Linguistica 30:1/2.205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Of Phonemes, Fossils and Webs of Meaning: The interpretation of language variation and change”. Language, Culture and Society: Key topics in linguistic anthropology ed. by Christine Jourdan & Kevin Tuite, 229–256. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuite, Kevin & Wolfgang Schulze
1998 “A Case of Taboo-Motivated Lexical Replacement in the Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus”. Anthropological Linguistics 40:3.363–383.Google Scholar
Turgot, Anne-Robert-Jacques
1966 [1756] “Étymologie”. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers ed. by Denis Diderot & Jean D’Alembert, vol. VI1, 98–111. Stuttgart: Friedrich Frommann.Google Scholar
Uslar, P. K.
1888 Ètnografija Kavkaza: Jazykoznanie, II: Čečenskij jazyk. Tiflis: Upravlenie Kavkazskago Učebnago Okruga.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Helma
2005 “The East Caucasian Language Family”. Lingua 1151.147–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, C. F. & F. M. Voegelin
1964 “Languages of the World: Ibero-Caucasian and PidginCreole. Fascicle one”. Anthropological Linguistics 6:8.1–39.Google Scholar
Vogt, Hans
1932 “Les groupes nominaux en arménien et en géorgien anciens”. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 51.57–81.Google Scholar
1942 “La parenté des langues caucasiques”. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 121.242–257.Google Scholar
1955 “Le basque et les langues caucasiques”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 511.121–147.Google Scholar
Voronov, Ju. N.
1994 Abkhazians – Who are they? Sukhum: Abkhazian State University.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Arkadiev, Peter
2022. Morphology of the Caucasian Languages: A Typological Overview. Jezikoslovni zapiski 28:1 DOI logo
Baker, Jennifer L., Charles N. Rotimi & Daniel Shriner
2017. Human ancestry correlates with language and reveals that race is not an objective genomic classifier. Scientific Reports 7:1 DOI logo
Grawunder, Sven
2017. The Caucasus. In The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, ► pp. 356 ff. DOI logo
ШКИЛЬ, М.Д.
2023. RELATIONS BETWEEN SECULAR POWER AND THE CHURCH IN THE VITA OF GRIGOL OF XANDZTA: TEXTUAL ANALYSIS AND CONTEXTUALIZATION. Известия СОИГСИ :48(87) ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2013. Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 2013. Isis 104:S1 ► pp. i ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.