This paper studies the relationship between grammar and language use by comparing word association and collocation. Since word association reveals mental semantic knowledge, usage-based approaches expect word association to mirror the relation between words in use, namely collocation. The paragraph is a more apt unit for collocation than the sentence in mirroring word association. Among measures of collocation, (simple) log likelihood and t-score turn out to be more consistent with association, with log likelihood leading by a small margin over MI or MI3. Overall, word association and collocation are quite close, but not perfectly close because of differences in relevant resources and the characteristics of lexical/semantic relations.
(Eds.) (2000) Usage Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI.
Baroni, M., & Evert, S.
(2009) Statistical methods for corpus exploitation. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol.21 (pp 777–803). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Beaugrande, R. de, & Dressler, W.
(1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Routledge.
Bednarek, M.
(2008) Semantic preferences and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 119–139.
Burger, H., Dobrovol’skij, D., Kühn, P., & Norrick, N. R.
(2007) Phraseology: Subject area, terminology and research topics. In H. Burger, D. Dobrovol’skij, P. Kühn & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Phraseology: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (pp. 10–19). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Church, K. W., & Hanks, P.
(1990) Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29.
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunning, T.
(1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.
Durrant, P., & Doherty, A.
(2010) Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investing the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6(2), 125–155.
Evert, S.
(2009) Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol.2 (pp. 1212–1248). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Firth, J. R.
(1957) Modes of meaning. In J. R. Firth, Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
Geeraerts, D.
(2010) Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glynn, D.
(2010) Synonymy, lexical fields, and grammatical constructions: A study in usage-based cognitive semantics. In H. -J. Schmid & S. Handl (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Usage Patterns (pp. 89–117). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(1999) Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Janda, L. A.
(Ed.) (2013) Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kent, G. H., & Rosanoff, A. J.
(1910) A study of association in insanity. American Journal of Insanity, 67(2), 317-390.
Kiss, G., Armstrong, C., Milroy, R., & Piper, J.
(1973) An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In A. J. Aitken, R. W. Bailey & N. Hamilton-SMmith (Eds.), The Computer and Literary Studies (pp. 153–165). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Leech, G., Rayson, P., & Wilson, A.
(2001) Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London: Longman.
Louw, B.
(1993) Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer. In M. Baker, G. Francis & T. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and Technology: In Honor of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lyons, J.
(1977) Semantics 11, 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H.
(1999) Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
(2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGee, I.
(2009) Adjective-noun collocations in elicited corpus data: Similarities, differences, and the whys and wherefores. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 79–103.
Michelbacher, L., Evert, S., & Schütze, H.
(2011) Asymmetry in corpus-derived and human word associations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 7(2), 245–276.
Mollin, S.
(2009) Combining corpus linguistic and psychological data on word co-occurrences: Corpus collocates versus word associations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(2), 175–200.
Padó, S., & Lapata, M.
(2007) Dependency-based construction of semantic space models. Computational Linguistics, 33(2), 161–199.
Rapp, R.
(2002) The computation of word associations: Comparing syntagmatic and paradigmatic approaches. In S. C. Tseng, T. E. Chen & Y. E. Liu (Eds.), COLING 2002: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistic 1 (pp. 1–7). Taipei: Howard International House.
Schulte im Walde, S., Melinger, A., Roth, M., & Weber, A.
(2008) An empirical characterisation of response types in German association norms. Research on Language and Computation, 6(2), 205–238.
Vivas, Leticia, Laura Manoiloff, Adolfo M. García, Francisco Lizarralde & Jorge Vivas
2019. Core Semantic Links or Lexical Associations: Assessing the Nature of Responses in Word Association Tasks. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48:1 ► pp. 243 ff.
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
2021. A Smart e-Learning System for Data-Driven Grammar Learning. In Smart Education and e-Learning 2021 [Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 240], ► pp. 77 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.