Cover not available
Article published In:
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 137/138 (2002) ► pp.313–340

The Acquisition of the Plural in Tarifit-Berber

between bilingual and monolingual children

| Tilburg University, the Netherlands

This paper brings a quantitative and qualitative study of the proficiency of bilingual children in plural formation in Tarifit-berber. These children were born and live in the Netherlands. Besides, a monolingual group in Morocco was submitted to the same plural task. The group in Morocco is used in this study as a reference group.

The expectations about the performances of the two groups are built on two facts. The first, the plural system of Tarifit-Berber is a complex one. Second, children born and grown up in migration (the Netherlands in this case) have a reduced input in their parents' language (Tarifit-Berber). The bilingual children in The Netherlands are expected to have more difficulties in performing the task. The study is intended to show how the two groups performed in the task, types of difficulties faced, commonalities and differences between them.

Published online: 1 January 2002
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.137-138.08rra
References
ANISFELD, M. & TRUCKER, G.R.
(1967) English pluralization rules of six-years old children. Child development 381, 1201–17.Google Scholar
BYBEE, J.
(1995) Regular morphology and lexicon. Language and cognitive processs 10, 5:425–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BOUYLMANI, A.
(1999) Elements of Berber Grammar. Dialect of the Ayt Touzine. Ph.D. Dissertation. Chouaib Doukkali University, AL Jadida, Morocco (not published).Google Scholar
CHAMI, M.
(1979) Un parler amazigh du Rif marocain: approche phonologique et morphologique. These de 3e cycle, Paris V1.Google Scholar
E-RRAMDANI, Y.
(1999b) Tweetalige ontwikkeling in Context: het Berbers en het Nederlands van in Nederland wonende kinderen. In: Anéla toegepast taalwetenschap in artikelen 61, jaargang 1999, nummer 11, 35–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LEONARD L.L. & L. SWANSON
(1999) Some differnces between English plural noun inflections and 3rd singular verb inflections in the input. In Journal of Child language 251, 531–543.Google Scholar
MARCUS, G.
(1995) Children's overgeneralization of English plural: a quantitative analysis. In Journal of child language 251, 447–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MARCUS, G.F., BRINKMANN, U. CLAHSEN, H., WIESE, R.& PINK, S.
(1995) German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive psychology 291, 189–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KOSSMAN, M.
(1997) Grammair du parler berbère de Feguig, Paris-Louvain: éditions Peeters.Google Scholar
KÖPCKE, K. M.
(1998) The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: Schemata versus rules. In Journal language of child 251, 293–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PENCHOEN, T.
(1973) Tamazight of Ait Ndhir. Los Angles: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
PINKER, S.
(1984) Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA. Harvard.Google Scholar
RUMELHART, D. & MCCLELLAND, J.
(1986) On learning the past tense of English verbs. Implicit rules or parrallel distributed processing? In J. McClelland, D. Rumelhart & the PDP research group (eds), Parrallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstrcuture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SAIB, J.
(1986a) Noun pluralization in Berber: a study in internal reconstruction. In Langues et Litératures, vol. 51. Rabat: publications of the faculty of Letters-Rabat, 109–133.Google Scholar
SLOBIN, D.
(1985) Crosslinguistic evidence for language-making capacity. In: D. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Volume 21: Theoretical issues. Hillsdale, NJ:Erbaum.Google Scholar