AbuSeileek, A.F.
2013.
Using track changes and word processor to provide corrective feedback to learners in writing.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29:4
► pp. 319 ff.
Afshari, Sajad, Azizollah Dabaghi & Saeed Ketabi
Al-Jarrah, Rasheed S.
2016.
A suggested model of corrective feedback provision.
Ampersand 3
► pp. 98 ff.
BABANOĞLU, M. Pınar, Reyhan AĞÇAM & Nebahat BADEM
2018.
Yükseköğretimde Yabancı Dil Eğitiminde Açık ve Örtük Yazılı Düzeltici Geribildirim: Türkiye Örneği.
İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 19:3
► pp. 104 ff.
Bagheri, Mina & Ehsan Rassaei
2022.
The Effects of Two Forms of Written Corrective Feedback and Ambiguity Tolerance on EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy.
English Teaching & Learning 46:1
► pp. 19 ff.
Bitchener, John
2012.
Written Corrective Feedback for L2 Development: Current Knowledge and Future Research.
TESOL Quarterly 46:4
► pp. 855 ff.
Bitchener, John
2012.
A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF.
Journal of Second Language Writing 21:4
► pp. 348 ff.
Bitchener, John
2018.
Direct Versus Indirect Grammar Feedback. In
The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,
► pp. 1 ff.
Bitchener, John
2021.
Written Corrective Feedback. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching,
► pp. 207 ff.
Bitchener, John & Ute Knoch
2015.
Written corrective feedback studies: Approximate replication of Bitchener & Knoch (2010a) and Van Beuningen, De Jong & Kuiken (2012).
Language Teaching 48:3
► pp. 405 ff.
Blázquez-Carretero, Miguel
2023.
Building a pedagogic spellchecker for L2 learners of Spanish.
ReCALL 35:3
► pp. 321 ff.
Bonilla López, Marisela, Elke Van Steendam & Kris Buyse
Bonilla López, Marisela, Elke Van Steendam, Dirk Speelman & Kris Buyse
2018.
The Differential Effects of Comprehensive Feedback Forms in the Second Language Writing Class.
Language Learning 68:3
► pp. 813 ff.
Brown, Dan, Qiandi Liu & Reza Norouzian
2023.
Effectiveness of written corrective feedback in developing L2 accuracy: A Bayesian meta-analysis.
Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882211473 ff.
Cao, Zhenhao
2021.
Improving Young Learners’ L2 Writing Accuracy with Written Corrective Feedback: a Case Study.
English Teaching & Learning 45:4
► pp. 375 ff.
Carr, Nicholas
2023.
Feedback on writing through the lens of activity theory: An exploration of changes to peer-to-peer interactions.
Assessing Writing 56
► pp. 100720 ff.
Cheng, Xiaolong & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2021.
Sustaining University English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Writing Performance through Provision of Comprehensive Written Corrective Feedback.
Sustainability 13:15
► pp. 8192 ff.
Cheng, Xiaolong & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2022.
Teachers Helping EFL Students Improve Their Writing Through Written Feedback: The Case of Native and Non-native English-Speaking Teachers' Beliefs.
Frontiers in Psychology 13
Damen, Debby, Marije van Amelsvoort, Per van der Wijst, Monique Pollmann & Emiel Krahmer
2021.
Lifting the curse of knowing: How feedback improves perspective-taking.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 74:6
► pp. 1054 ff.
DERYA, TUZCU-EKEN
2021.
TEACHER WRITTEN FEEDBACK PREFERENCES OF UNIVERSITY PREPCLASS
STUDENTS IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE WRITING COURSE.
i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 11:2
► pp. 55 ff.
Durán, Jorge Lillo
2014.
Efecto del feedback correctivo directo y metalingüistico en el proceso de escritura de una L2 en el contexto escolar: estudio piloto.
Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 53:1
► pp. 163 ff.
Ekanayaka, Waruni Iresha & Rod Ellis
2020.
Does asking learners to revise add to the effect of written corrective feedback on L2 acquisition?.
System 94
► pp. 102341 ff.
Esfandiar, Fatemeh, Baqure Yaqubi & Amir Marzban
2014.
Learning Corrected Target Forms: Students’ Corrective Feedback through Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback in Iranian EFL Context.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:3
Ferris, Dana R., Hsiang Liu, Aparna Sinha & Manuel Senna
2013.
Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers.
Journal of Second Language Writing 22:3
► pp. 307 ff.
Gholami, Javad & Somayeh Aliyari
2015.
The impact of planned preemptive focus on form on Iranian EFL learners’ essay writing ability.
International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning 10:3
► pp. 234 ff.
Guo, Qi & Jessie S. Barrot
2019.
Effects of Metalinguistic Explanation and Direct Correction on EFL Learners’ Linguistic Accuracy.
Reading & Writing Quarterly 35:3
► pp. 261 ff.
Hamano-Bunce, Douglas
2022.
The effects of direct written corrective feedback and comparator texts on the complexity and accuracy of revisions and new pieces of writing.
Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882211276 ff.
Hassan, Ameena & Akhtar Abbas
2022.
The Impact of Written Corrective Feedback on Second Language Composition in English. In
English Language Teaching in Pakistan [
English Language Teaching: Theory, Research and Pedagogy, ],
► pp. 181 ff.
Icy Lee
2014.
Teachers’ Reflection on Implementation of Innovative Feedback Approaches in EFL Writing.
English Teaching 69:1
► pp. 23 ff.
Lee, Icy
2013.
Research into practice: Written corrective feedback.
Language Teaching 46:1
► pp. 108 ff.
Lee, Icy
2014.
Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges.
Assessing Writing 19
► pp. 1 ff.
Lee, Icy
2017.
Teacher Feedback in L2 Writing. In
Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts,
► pp. 65 ff.
Lee, Icy
2019.
Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more.
Language Teaching 52:4
► pp. 524 ff.
Lee, Icy
2021.
Written Corrective Feedback. In
Research Questions in Language Education and Applied Linguistics [
Springer Texts in Education, ],
► pp. 425 ff.
Ji-Hyun Kim
2015.
The effects of direct error correction and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English article in EFL Contexts..
English Language Teaching 27:4
► pp. 153 ff.
Kang, EunYoung & Zhaohong Han
2015.
The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta‐Analysis.
The Modern Language Journal 99:1
► pp. 1 ff.
Karim, Khaled & Hossein Nassaji
2020.
The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing.
Language Teaching Research 24:4
► pp. 519 ff.
Khezrlou, Sima
2021.
Effects of timing and availability of isolated FFI on learners’ written accuracy and fluency through task repetition.
The Language Learning Journal 49:5
► pp. 568 ff.
KHODADADİ, Soulmaz
2021.
The effect of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ grammatical accuracy in sentence completion exercises.
Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi 17:1
► pp. 315 ff.
Kim, YouJin, Bumyong Choi, Sanghee Kang, Binna Kim & Hyunae Yun
2020.
Comparing the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students' perceptions.
Foreign Language Annals 53:1
► pp. 176 ff.
Kim, YouJin, Bumyong Choi, Hyunae Yun, Binna Kim & Sujeong Choi
2022.
Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study.
Language Teaching Research 26:6
► pp. 1106 ff.
KIVRAK, Cansu
2023.
Turkish EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Preferences of Written Corrective Feedback.
Journal of Language Research 7:1
► pp. 15 ff.
Kılıçkaya, Ferit
2022.
Pre-service language teachers’ online written corrective feedback preferences and timing of feedback in computer-supported L2 grammar instruction.
Computer Assisted Language Learning 35:1-2
► pp. 62 ff.
Lee, Icy, Na Luo & Pauline Mak
2022.
Diagnostic Assessment of Written Accuracy: New Directions for Written Corrective Feedback in Secondary Writing Classrooms. In
Assessing the English Language Writing of Chinese Learners of English,
► pp. 213 ff.
Lee, Icy, Pauline Mak & Anne Burns
2016.
EFL teachers’ attempts at feedback innovation in the writing classroom.
Language Teaching Research 20:2
► pp. 248 ff.
Lira-Gonzales, Maria-Lourdes & Hossein Nassaji
2023.
The Differential Effects of Focused and Comprehensive Corrective Feedback on Accuracy of Revision and New Writing.
The Canadian Modern Language Review 79:1
► pp. 38 ff.
Liu, Qiandi & Dan Brown
2015.
Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing.
Journal of Second Language Writing 30
► pp. 66 ff.
Liu, Yiming, Neomy Storch & Janne Morton
2022.
It takes two to tango: Investigating teacher-student interactions related to written corrective feedback with Activity Theory.
Assessing Writing 53
► pp. 100647 ff.
Loncar, Michael, Wayne Schams & Jong-Shing Liang
2023.
Multiple technologies, multiple sources: trends and analyses of the literature on technology-mediated feedback for L2 English writing published from 2015-2019.
Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:4
► pp. 722 ff.
Manchón, Rosa M. & Olena Vasylets
2019.
Language Learning Through Writing: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning,
► pp. 341 ff.
Moradian, Mahmood Reza, Mojgan Hossein-Nasab & Mowla Miri
Moradian, Mahmood Reza, Mowla Miri & Mojgan Hossein Nasab
2017.
Contribution of written languaging to enhancing the efficiency of written corrective feedback.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:2
► pp. 406 ff.
Nassaji, Hossein, Ali Kushki & Mohammad Rahimi
2021.
The Differential Diagnostic Affordances of Interventionist and Interactionist Dynamic Assessment for L2 Argumentative Writing.
Language and Sociocultural Theory 7:2
► pp. 151 ff.
Nguyen, Chi-Duc
2021.
Scaffolding student engagement with written corrective feedback: Transforming feedback sessions into learning affordances.
Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882110409 ff.
Nicolaidou, Iolie
2013.
E-portfolios supporting primary students' writing performance and peer feedback.
Computers & Education 68
► pp. 404 ff.
NICOLÁS–CONESA, FLORENTINA, ROSA MARÍA MANCHÓN & LOURDES CEREZO
2019.
The Effect of Unfocused Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback on Rewritten Texts and New Texts: Looking into Feedback for Accuracy and Feedback for Acquisition.
The Modern Language Journal 103:4
► pp. 848 ff.
Niu, Ruiying & Xiaoye You
2020.
Effects of Indirect Corrective Feedback With and Without Written Languaging on L2 Written Accuracy: A Multitask Intervention Study.
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 29:4
► pp. 343 ff.
Park, Eun Sung, Sunhee Song & Yu Kyoung Shin
2016.
To what extent do learners benefit from indirect written corrective feedback? A study targeting learners of different proficiency and heritage language status.
Language Teaching Research 20:6
► pp. 678 ff.
Pearson, William S.
2020.
Research article titles in written feedback on English as a second language writing.
Scientometrics 123:2
► pp. 997 ff.
Roothooft, Hanne, Amparo Lázaro-Ibarrola & Bram Bulté
2022.
Task repetition and corrective feedback via models and direct corrections among young EFL writers: Draft quality and task motivation.
Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882210820 ff.
Shalizar, Reza & Amir Rezaei
2023.
Examining the differential effects of focused vs. unfocused ZPD and explicit feedback on second language writing.
The Language Learning Journal 51:3
► pp. 359 ff.
Shao, Jinshi & Yongcan Liu
2022.
Written corrective feedback, learner-internal cognitive processes, and the acquisition of regular past tense by Chinese L2 learners of English.
Applied Linguistics Review 13:6
► pp. 1005 ff.
Shao, Jinshi, Yuxi (Jessie) Wu, Simin Zeng & Rujing (Renee) Huang
2023.
The role of feedback type and language anxiety in the effectiveness of written corrective feedback for L2 learning.
The Language Learning Journal ► pp. 1 ff.
Shin, Hye Won
2022.
Comparative analysis of written corrective feedback strategies: a linear growth modeling approach.
International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0
Shintani, Natsuko & Scott Aubrey
Simard, Daphnée, Danièle Guénette & Annie Bergeron
2015.
L2 learners' interpretation and understanding of written corrective feedback: insights from their metalinguistic reflections.
Language Awareness 24:3
► pp. 233 ff.
Sinha, Tara Shankar & Hossein Nassaji
2022.
ESL learners’ perception and its relationship with the efficacy of written corrective feedback.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics 32:1
► pp. 41 ff.
Maryam Soleimani & Sima Modirkhamene
2020.
Various Corrective Feedback Types in Collaborative vs. Individual Writing Conditions.
International Journal of Research in English Education 5:3
► pp. 24 ff.
Soleimani, Neda, Mohammad Rahimi & Michelle Mingyue Gu
2021.
(Mis) Alignment of Iranian EFL Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback beliefs and practices from an Activity Theory Perspective.
Cogent Education 8:1
Solloway, Anthony
2016.
Do Two Wrongs Make a Write(r)? Some Effects and Non-effects of WCF on Arabic L1 Students’ English Academic Writing. In
Teaching EFL Writing in the 21st Century Arab World,
► pp. 189 ff.
Storch, Neomy
2018.
Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda.
Language Teaching 51:2
► pp. 262 ff.
Suzuki, Wataru, Hossein Nassaji & Konosuke Sato
2019.
The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing.
System 81
► pp. 135 ff.
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi, Masatoshi Sato & Yizhou Wang
2023.
Engagement with written corrective feedback: Examination of feedback types and think-aloud protocol as pedagogical interventions.
Language Teaching Research
van Beuningen, Catherine
2021.
Focused versus Unfocused Corrective Feedback. In
The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching,
► pp. 300 ff.
Van Beuningen, Catherine G., Nivja H. De Jong & Folkert Kuiken
2012.
Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing.
Language Learning 62:1
► pp. 1 ff.
Williams, Jessica
2012.
The potential role(s) of writing in second language development.
Journal of Second Language Writing 21:4
► pp. 321 ff.
Wölfel, Matthias
2020.
Non-distracting Feedback in Artificial Intelligence Supported Learning. In
Artificial Intelligence Supported Educational Technologies [
Advances in Analytics for Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 31 ff.
Zhang, Lawrence Jun & Xiaolong Cheng
2021.
Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 54
► pp. 101043 ff.
신선애 & 송해덕
2015.
The Effects of Online Peer Feedback Type on Online Interaction Centrality, Node Type, and Social Network Density.
The Journal of Lifelong Education and HRD 11:2
► pp. 183 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.