Humor and advertising in Twitter
An approach from the General Theory of Verbal Humor and Metapragmatics
Irony and verbal humor play a leading role in computer-mediated discourses. Irony, for instance, is mainly used to criticise politics and politicians in Twitter, while verbal humor contributes to strengthen social relations in Twitter or Facebook. In this paper, we focus on humor in order to explore more in deep its mechanisms, function, and effects within Twitter “conversations” between Spanish companies or public institutions and microblog users. Assuming the main premises of the General Theory of Verbal Humor and adopting a metapragmatic approach, this research aims at identifying the knowledge resources at work when humor is used as an advertising strategy; as well as categorizing these tweets according to the types of logical mechanisms adopted by the interactants to solve the script-opposition in which humor is based. The analysis proves that verbal and visual humor is a strategy adopted by most companies and institutions in order to give visibility to their products and services and to reinforce the social ties with their potential customers.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.General Theory of Verbal Humor and Metapragmatics
- 3.Corpus and methodology
- 4.Results of the analysis
- 4.1Twitter “conversations” and humor
- 4.2A taxonomy of humorous tweets with propagandistic purposes
- 4.2.1Humorous tweets based on script-oppositions
- 4.2.2Humor based on exaggeration
- 4.2.3Humorous tweets based on graphic information
- 4.2.4Humorous tweets based on current news
- 4.2.5Tweets based on parody and intertextuality
- 4.2.6Ironic tweets
- 4.2.7Humor responding to an attack or a complaint
- 4.2.8The customer as a target
- 5.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
Bibliography
References
Bibliography
Alvarado Ortega, M. Belén
2013 “
An approach to verbal humor in interaction.”
Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 95: 594–603.
Alvarado Ortega, M. Belén, and Leonor Ruiz Gurillo
2013 Humor, ironía y géneros textuales. San Vicente del Raspeig: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante.
Antonopoulou, Eleni, and Maria Sifianou
2003 “
Conversational dynamics of humor: The telephone game in Greek.”
Journal of Pragmatics 35: 741–769.
Attardo, Salvatore
1994 Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Attardo, Salvatore
2001 Humorous texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Attardo, Salvatore
2008 “
A primer for the linguistics of humor.” In
The Primer of Humor Research, ed. by
Victor Raskin, 101–155. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin
1991 “
Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.”
HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 4 (3–4): 293–347.
Attardo, Salvatore, F. Christian Hempelmann, and Sara Di Maio
2002 “
Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modelling incongruities and their resolutions.”
HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 16–2: 3–46.
Briz Gómez, Antonio
2007 “
Límites para el análisis de la conversación. Órdenes y unidades: turno, intervención y diálogo.”
RILI. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 1(9): 23–27.
Bruzos Moro, Alberto
2009 “
La polifonía.” In
Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía, ed. by
Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and
Xosé A. Padilla García, 45–54. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Carranza Márquez, Aurelia
2010 “
The faces of humor: humor as a catalyst of face in the context of the British and the Spanish Parliament.”
HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 23–4: 467–504.
Catanescu, Codrita, and Gail Tom
2001 “
Types of humor in television and magazine advertising.”
Review of Business 22 (1–2): 92–94.
Charaudeau, Patrick
2012 “
El discurso de la propaganda. Un intento de tipologización.” In
Los géneros discursivos desde múltiples perspectivas: teorías y análisis, ed. by
Martha Shiro,
>Patrick Charaudeau, and
Luisa Granato, 125–138. Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.
Davies, Christie
2011 “
Logical mechanisms: A critique.”
HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 24 (2): 159–165.
Fant, Lars
1996 “
Regulación conversacional en la negociación: una comparación entre pautas mexicanas y peninsulares.” In
El español hablado y la cultura oral en España e Hispanoamérica, ed. by
Thomas Kotschi,
Wulf Oesterreicher, and
Klaus Zimmermann, 147–183. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.
Flaherty, Karen, Marc G. Weinberger, and Charles S. Gulas
2004 “
The Impact of Perceived Humor, Product Type, and Humor Style in Radio Advertising.”
Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26 (1): 25–36.
Gombert, Jean E.
1992 Metalinguistic development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Grice, Paul
1975 “
Logic and conversation.” In
Syntax and Semantics. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by
Peter Cole, and
Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Gulas, Charles S., and Marc G. Weinberger
2006 Humor in Advertising: A Comprehensive Analysis. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Haverkate, Henk
1985 “
La ironía verbal: análisis pragmalingüístico.”
Revista Española de Lingüística 15 (2): 343–391.
Hempelmann, Christian F.
2004 “
Script Oppositeness and Logical Mechanism in Punning.”
HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 17 (4): 381–392.
Hempelmann, Christian F., and Salvatore Attardo
2011 “
Resolutions and Their Incongruities: Further Thoughts on Logical Mechanisms.”
HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 24 (2): 125–149.
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra
2002b “
Over the edge? Subversive humour between colleagues and friends.”
HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research 15 (1): 65–87.
Kreuz, Roger J., and Sam Glucksberg
1989 “
How to be sarcastic: the echoic reminder theory of verbal irony.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology 118 (4): 374–386.
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Sam Glucksberg, and Mary Brown
1995 “
How about another Piece of Pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology 124: 3–21.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000 Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mancera Rueda, Ana
2014 “
El sexismo como blanco del humor en las redes sociales.”
Feminismo/s 24: 163–192.
Mancera Rueda, Ana, and Ana Pano Alamán
2013a El discurso político en Twitter. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Mancera Rueda, Ana, and Ana Pano Alamán
2013b El español coloquial en las redes sociales. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Mancera Rueda, Ana, and Uta Helfrich
2014 “
La crisis en 140 caracteres: el discurso propagandístico en la red social Twitter.”
Cultura, lenguaje y representación 12: 59–86.
Méndez-García de Paredes, Elena
Norrick, Neal R.
2003 “
Issues in conversational joking.”
Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1333–1359.
Padilla García, Xosé A., and Elisa Gironzetti
2012 “
Humor e ironía en las viñetas cómicas periodísticas: un estudio pragmático-intercultural.” In
Pragmática y comunicación intercultural en el mundo hispanohablante, ed. by
María Elena Placencia, and
Carmen García, 93–133. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Pano Alamán, Ana
2015 “
Ironía verbal y actividad de imagen en el discurso de políticos y ciudadanos españoles en Twitter.”
Sociocultural Pragmatics/ Pragmática sociocultural, 3 (1): 59–89.
Pano Alamán, Ana, and Ana Mancera Rueda
2014a “
Identidades falsas en Twitter: la ironía y el humor verbal como mecanismos paródicos.” In “Discurso e identidad en el ciberespacio hispano”, ed. by
María Elena Placencia, and
Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez.
Discurso & Sociedad 8 (3): 507–536.
Pano Alamán, Ana, and Ana Mancera Rueda
2014b “
La ‘conversación’ en Twitter: las unidades discursivas y el uso de marcadores interactivos en los intercambios con parlamentarios españoles en la red social.” In
Unidades de segmentación en el discurso, ed. by
Luis Cortés.
Estudios de Lingüística del español 35 (1): 234–268.
Poon, James, and Teng Fatt
2002 “
When business can be fun.”
Management Research News, 25 (1): 39–48.
Raskin, Victor
1985 Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Raskin, Victor
2008 The Primer of Humor Research. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Reyes, Graciela
2002 Metapragmática. Lenguaje sobre el lenguaje, ficciones, figuras. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor
2012 La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor, Xosé A. Padilla García, Carmen Marimón Llorca, and Larissa Timofeeva
2004 “
El proyecto GRIALE para la ironía en español: conceptos previos.”
Estudios de lingüística 18: 231–242.
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor, and Xosé A. Padilla García
(eds.) 2009 Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor and M. Belén Alvarado Ortega
Schaefer, Mark. W.
2012 The Tao of Twitter. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
Silverstein, Michael
1993 “
Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function.” In
Reflexive language: reported speech and metapragmatics, ed. by
John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Timofeeva, Larissa
2009 “
Las unidades fraseológicas.” In
Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía, ed. by
Leonor Ruiz Gurillo, and
Xosé A. Padilla García, 193–217. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Verschueren, Jef
1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
Verschueren, Jef
2002 “
Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use.” In
Pragmatique et psychologie, ed. by
Josie Bernicot, 57–72. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
Zappavigna, Michele
2012 The Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Continuum.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Elers, Steve & Phoebe Elers
2018.
Tāme Iti and Twitter: a voice from prison.
Media International Australia 169:1
► pp. 74 ff.
Yang, Ping
2019.
Language and Visual Communication. In
The Role of Language and Symbols in Promotional Strategies and Marketing Schemes [
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services, ],
► pp. 28 ff.
Yus, Francisco
2023.
Humour on Social Networking Sites. In
Pragmatics of Internet Humour,
► pp. 189 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.