Article published In:
Journal of Argumentation in Context
Vol. 9:2 (2020) ► pp.243282
References
Cicero
2006On invention, The best kind of orator, Topics (trans: Hubbell, H. M.; Loeb Classical Library 386). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Google Scholar
Cole, S. W.
1996Nippur IV. The Early Neo-Babylonian Governor’s Archive from Nippur. Oriental Institute Publications. Volume 1141. Chicago: the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Culbertson, L. E.
2009Dispute Resolution in the Provincial Courts of the Third Dynasty of Ur. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Near Eastern Studies) in the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Culbertson, L.
Local Courts in Centralizing States: The Case of Ur III Mesopotamia, [in:] Social Theory in Archaeology and Ancient History, 185–202. DOI logo
Friberg, J.
2007A Remarkable Collection of Babylonian Mathematical Texts. Manuscripts in the Schøyen Collection Cuneiform Texts I. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holtz, Sh. E.
2009Neo-Babylonian Court Procedure. Series: Cuneiform monographs. Brill: Leiden, Boston. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Neo-Babylonian Trial Records. Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienast, B., Volk, K.
1995Die Sumerischen und Akkadischen Briefe des III Jahrtausends aus der Zeit vor der III Dynastie von Ur. Freiburg: F. Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Lafont, B.
2000Les texts judiciaries sumériens, [in] Joannes (ed.), Rendre la justice en Mesopotamie. Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, pp. 35–68.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. A. B.
1913The Oath in Cuneiform Inscriptions, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 331, 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michalowski, P., Walker, C. B.
1989A New Sumerian “Law Code”, [in] H. Behrens et al. (eds.), Dumu-e2-dub-ba-a: Studies in Honor of Ake W. Sjoberg. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Molina, M.
2000La ley mas Antigua: Textes legales sumerios. Madrid.Google Scholar
2008New Ur III Court Records Concerning Slavery, [in:] P. Michalowski (ed.). On the Third Dynasty of Ur: Studies in Honor of Marcel Sigrist. Journal of Cuneiform Studies Supplementary Series 1. ASOR, pp. 125–143.Google Scholar
Roth, M.
2001Reading Mesopotamian Law Cases PBS 5 100: A Question of Filiation, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 44/31:243–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roth, M. T.
1995Law collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor. With a contribution by Harry A. Hoffner, Ir.; edited by Piotr Michalowski. Scholars Press Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Schumann, A.
2019aDid the Neo-Babylonians Construct a Symbolic Logic for Legal Proceedings?, Journal of Applied Logics – IfCoLoG Journal of Logics and their Applications, 6(1): 31–82.Google Scholar
2019bOn the Origin of Indian Logic from the Viewpoint of the Pāli Canon, Logica Universalis, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Francisca, A., Henkemans, S., Verheij, B., Wagemans, J. H. M.
2014Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: Springer.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R.
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, D.
1995Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Series: Studies in Argumentation Theory. Routledge.Google Scholar
Weisberg, D. B.
2003Neo-Nabylonian Texts in the Oriental Institute Collection. Oriental Institute Publications. Volume 1141. Chicago: the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Schumann, Andrew
2020. Judgments and Truth: Essays in Honour of Jan Woleński. Studia Humana 9:3-4  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.