Article published In: How to Ask (Im)politely: Letters from Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East from the ninth to the nineteenth century
Edited by Gijsbert Rutten and Petra Sijpesteijn
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 27:1] 2026
► pp. 41–66
“Hurry to send it, my lord, my love”
Politeness strategies in eight Arabic private letters of request from the ninth century ad
Published online: 8 May 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00084.koo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00084.koo
Abstract
This article investigates politeness strategies in eight ninth-century Arabic private letters of request from the Fayyoum, in Egypt. The large corpus of Arabic letters written on papyrus that is preserved and edited so far, forms a rich resource for those interested in pragmatics. While historical Greek and Latin (Dickey, Eleanor. 2010. “Forms of Address and Markers of Status”. In Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, 327–337. Chichester, UK: John Wiley. , . 2012. “The Rules of Politeness and Latin Request Formulae”. In Philomen Probert and Andreas Willi (eds), Laws and Rules in Indo-European, 313–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. , . 2016b. “Politeness in Ancient Rome: Can It Help Us Evaluate Modern Politeness Theories?” Journal of Politeness Research 12 (2): 197–220. ), English (Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. “Linguistic Politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A Study of Old English Address Terms”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9 (1): 140–158. ; Ridealgh, Kim and Andreas H. Jucker. 2019. “Late Egyptian, Old English and the Re-Evaluation of Discernment Politeness in Remote Cultures”. Journal of Pragmatics 1441: 56–66. ; Jucker, Andreas H. 2020. Politeness in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ; Groot, Hester E. 2024. “Developing a Standard in Lower-Class Scottish Writing: Pauper Petitions as a Source for Nineteenth-Century Lower-Class Scottish Language”. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 10 (1): 127–155. ) and Dutch (Rutten, Gijsbert J. and M. Van der Wal. 2012. “Functions of Epistolary Formulae in Dutch Letters from the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13 (2): 173–201. , Rutten, Gijsbert and Marijke Van der Wal. 2014. Letters as Loot: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ; Rutten, Gijsbert. 2019. Language Planning as Nation Building: Ideology, Policy and Implementation in the Netherlands, 1750–1850. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ) have received the attention of scholars for their potential to shed light on interactional norms and politeness in historical societies, the pragmatic features of historical Arabic letters have not. This article will focus on the politeness strategies employed in eight letters by two members of the same household who lived in the Fayyoum, asking their brother for material and/or financial support. This will demonstrate that these letters, similar to general trends in the wider corpus, display a preference for the use of direct imperatives to make requests. Two important mitigating strategies were employed and can be found in the use of vocatives, and the general framing of the letter through its structure and the use of formulaic elements; these are crucial to communicate the tone of the letter and establish the relationship between the initiator and the addressee. Besides these general strategies, this article also considers how the gender of the initiator of the letters contributed to the strategies that are employed in the letters, showing that social ties and related social obligations formed an important part of the framing of the requests.
Keywords: Arabic papyri, gender, historical pragmatics, politeness, private requests
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The corpus
- 1.2Delegated writing
- 1.3Politeness and formulaic language use
- 2.Analysis of the letters
- 2.1Framing
- 2.2Requests
- 2.3Vocatives
- 3.Discussion and conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (56)
Amory, Yasmine. 2022. “Visual Signs of Deference in Late Antique Greek Letters on Papyrus”. In Klaas Bentein and Yasmine Amory (eds), Novel Perspectives on Communication Practices in Antiquity: Towards a Historical Social-Semiotic Approach, 54–64. Leiden: Brill.
Barrios-Lech, Peter. 2022. “Towards a Comparison of Greek and Roman Politeness Systems”. In Luis Unceta Gomez and Lukasz Berger (eds), Politeness in Ancient Greek and Latin, 45–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dickey, Eleanor. 2010. “Forms of Address and Markers of Status”. In Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, 327–337. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
. 2012. “The Rules of Politeness and Latin Request Formulae”. In Philomen Probert and Andreas Willi (eds), Laws and Rules in Indo-European, 313–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2016a. “Emotional Language and Formulae of Persuasion in Greek Papyrus Letters”. In Edward Sanders and Matthew Johncock (eds), Emotion and Persuasion in Classical Antiquity, 237–262. Stuttgart: Franz Steuner Verlag.
. 2016b. “Politeness in Ancient Rome: Can It Help Us Evaluate Modern Politeness Theories?” Journal of Politeness Research 12 (2): 197–220.
Diem, Werner. 1987. “Review of: Yūsuf Rāġib: Marchands d’étoffes Du Fayyoum Au IIIe/IXe Siècle d’après Leurs Archives (Actes et Letters). ii: La Correspondance Administrative et Privée Des Banū ʿAbd al-Muʾmin. Le Caire 1985. vi, 106 S., 37 Tafn. (Supplément Aux Annales Islamologiques. Cahier No. 5)”. Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 137 (2): 403–405.
. 1995. “Review of: Rāġib, Yūsuf, Marchands d’étoffes Du Fayyoum Au IIIe/IXe Siècle: D’aprés Leurs Archives (Actes et Lettres): 3: Lettres Des Banū Ṯawr Aux Banū ʿAbd al-Mu’min”. Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Morgenlandischen Gesellschaft 145 (1): 170.
. 1997. Arabische Briefe Des 7. Bis 13. Jahrhunderts Aus Den Staatlichen Museen Berlin (‘Arabic Letters from the 7th–13th Centuries from the State Museums of Berlin’). (Two1 volumes.) Volume 2: Arabische Urkunden. Documenta Arabica Antiqua, 4 Ägyptische Urkunden aus den Staatlichen Museen Berlin (‘Arabic Document from Antiquity, 4 Egyptian Documents from the State Museums of Berlin’). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
El-Sayed, Ali M. 1989. “Politeness Formulas in English and Arabic: A Contrastive Study”. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (2): 96–113.
Farghal, Mohammed and A. A. Mahmoud Al-Khatib. 2001. “Jordanian College Students’ Responses to Compliments: A Pilot Study”. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (9): 1485–1502.
Ferguson, Charles A. 1976. “The Structure and Use of Politeness Formulas”. Language in Society 5 (2): 137–151.
Garosi, Eugenio. 2022. Projecting a New Empire: Formats, Social Meaning and Mediality of Imperial Arabic in the Umayyad and Early Abbasid Periods. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Grob, Eva Mira. 2010. Documentary Arabic Private and Business Letters on Papyrus: Form and Function, Content and Context. Archiv Für Papyrusforschung Und Verwandte Gebiete. New York: De Gruyter.
Groot, Hester E. 2024. “Developing a Standard in Lower-Class Scottish Writing: Pauper Petitions as a Source for Nineteenth-Century Lower-Class Scottish Language”. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 10 (1): 127–155.
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “Respect and Deference”. In Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham (eds), Interpersonal Pragmatics, 271–288. (Volume 61.) Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki and Tsunao Ogino. 1986. “Universals of Linguistic Politeness: Quantitative Evidence from Japanese and American English”. Journal of Pragmatics 10 (3): 347–371.
Hopkins, Simon A. 1984. Studies in the Grammar of Early Arabic: Based upon Documentary Material Datable to before 300 A.H./912 A.D. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
House, Juliane and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. “Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness”. Multilingua 8 (2): 223–248.
Jucker, Andreas H. 2020. Politeness in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplony, A. 2018. “Comparing Qurānic Suras with Pre-800 Documents: With an Appendix on Subtypes of Pre-800 Kitāb Documents”. Der Islam 95 (2): 312–366.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2012. “From Good Manners to Facework: Politeness Variations and Constants in France, from the Classic Age to Today”. In Marcel Bax and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness: Relational Linguistic Pratice over Time and across Cultures, 131–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Khan, G. 1990. “The Historical Development of the Structure of the Medieval Arabic Petitions”. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 53 (1): 8–30.
Khan, Geoffrey. 2013. “The Historical Development of Early Arabic Documentary Formulae”. In Esther-Miriam Wagner, Ben Outhwaite and Bettina Neinhof (eds), Scribes as Agents of Language Change, 199–215. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. “Linguistic Politeness in Anglo-Saxon England? A Study of Old English Address Terms”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9 (1): 140–158.
Kootstra-Ford, Fokelien. Forthcoming. “Excuse the Papyrus, I Wrote to You in Haste; The Pragmatics of Opistography in Arabic Private Correspondence (9th Cent. AD)”. In Unwritten Side of (Im)Politeness. Trends in Classics — Supplementary Volumes. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kootstra, Fokelien. Forthcoming 2026. “For I Am Your Sister, for We Are Your Siblings: Gendered Dynamics and Vernacular Rhetoric in Arabic Private Letters of Request on Papyrus”. Arabica.
Leitner, Magdalena and Andreas H. Jucker. 2021. “Historical Sociopragmatics”. In Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár and Marina Terkourafi (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, 687–709. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minsky, Marvin. 1975. “A Framework for Representing Knowledge”. In Berthold K. P. Horn and Patrick Winston (eds), The Psychology of Computer Vision, 211–277. New York: MacGraw- Hill.
Potthast, D. 2019. “Qurʾān Quotations in the Arabic Papyrus Letters from the 7th to the 10th Centuries”. In Andreas Kaplony and Michael Marx (eds), Qurʾān Quotations Preserved on Papyrus Documents 7th-10th Centuries; and the Problem of Carbon Dating Early Qurʾāns, 42–85. Documenta Coranica. Leiden: Brill.
Qutbuddin, Tahera. 2019. “Arabic Oration: Art and Function”. In Maribel Fierro, M. Şukru Hanioǧlu, Renata Holod and Florian Schwarz (eds), Handbooks of Oriental Studies. (Volume 1311.) Leiden: Brill.
Rāġib, Yūsuf. 1979. “Trois Documents Datés Du Louvre” (‘Three Dated Documents from the Louvre’). Annales Islamologiques 15 (2): 1–9.
. 1982. Marchands d’Étoffes Du Fayyoum Au IIIe/IXe Siècle d’après Leurs Archives (Actes et Lettres); Les Actes Des Banū ʿAbd al-Muʾmin. Volume I. Suppléments Aux Annales Islamologiques 2 (‘Cloth Merchants from the Fayyoum from the 3rd/9th Century According to their Archives (Documents and Letters); The Documents of the Banū al-Muʾmin. Volume I. Supplement to the Islamologic Annals 2’). Cairo: Institut Français d’ Archéologie Orientale.
. 1985. Marchands d’ Étoffes Du Fayyoum Au IIIe/IXe Siècle d’ Après Leurs Archives (Actes et Lettres). Volume ii. Suppléments Aux Annales Islamologiques 5 (‘Cloth Merchants from the Fayyoum from the 3rd/9th Century According to their Archives (Documents and Letters). Volume ii. Supplement to the Islamologic Annals 5’). Cairo: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.
. 1992a. “Marchands d’Egypte Du VIIe Au IX Siècle d’après Leur Correspondance et Leur Actes” (‘Egyptian Merchants from the 7th — 9th Centuries According to their Correspondence and their Documents’). In Alain Guerreau (ed.), Le Marchand Au Moyen Age: Actes Du XIXe Congrès de Société Des Historiens Médiévistes de l’Enseignement Supérieur Public (‘The Merchant in the Middle Ages: Proceedings of the XIXth Conference of the Society of Medieval Historians of Public Higher Education’), 25–31. Reims, Paris, 1988. SHMES et CID Editions. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1992b. Marchands d’Étoffes Du Fayyoum Au IIIe/IXe Siècle Dápres Leurs Archives (Actes et Lettres); Lettres Des Banū Ṯawr Aux Banū ʿAbd al-Muʾmin. Volume iii. Suppléments Aux Annales Islamologiques 14 (‘Cloth Merchants from the Fayyoum from the 3rd/9th Century According to their Archives (Documents and Letters); Letters of the Banū Ṯawr to the Banū ʿAbd al-Muʾmin. Volume iii. Supplement to the Islamologic Annals 14’). Cairo: Institut Français d’ Archéologie Orientale.
Ridealgh, Kim and Andreas H. Jucker. 2019. “Late Egyptian, Old English and the Re-Evaluation of Discernment Politeness in Remote Cultures”. Journal of Pragmatics 1441: 56–66.
Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: Gieben.
Rutten, Gijsbert. 2019. Language Planning as Nation Building: Ideology, Policy and Implementation in the Netherlands, 1750–1850. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rutten, Gijsbert J. and M. Van der Wal. 2012. “Functions of Epistolary Formulae in Dutch Letters from the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13 (2): 173–201.
Rutten, Gijsbert and Marijke Van der Wal. 2014. Letters as Loot: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Dutch. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sijpesteijn, Petra M. 2013. Shaping a Muslim State: The World of a Mid-Eighth Century Egyptian Official. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2020. “The Arabic Script and Language in the Earliest Papyri: Mirrors or Change”. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 491: 433–494.
2022. “Good Governance in Theory and Practice: Comparing Abū Yūsuf’s Kitāb al-Kharāj with Papyri”. In Maaike Van Berkel and Letizia Osti (eds), The Historian of Islam at Work: Essays in Honor of Hugh N. Kennedy, 201–209. Leiden: Brill.
2024. “Aloneness as a Connector in Arabic PApyrus Lettes of Request”. In Edmund Hayes and Petra M. Sijpesteijn (eds), Mechanisms of Social Dependency in the Early Islamic Empire, 127–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 2007. “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 107–138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2005. “An Argument for a Frame-Based Approach to Politeness: Evidence from the Use of the Imperative in Cypriot Greek”. In Robin Lakoff and Sachiko Ide (eds), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness, 99–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Terkourafi, Marina and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2017. “Convention and Ritual (Im)Politeness”. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, 171–196. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Van der Wal, Marijke. 2021. “The Black Box of Delegated Writing: Early Modern Scribes and Female Literacy in The Netherlands”. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 7 (2): 303–330.
Vanthieghem, Naïm. 2014. “Les Archives Des Marchands d’étoffes Du Fayoum Revisitées, I. Un Nouveau Ḏikr Ḥaqq Du Marchand Abū Hurayra” (‘The Archives of the Cloth Merchants of the Fayyoum Revisited, I. A New Ḏikr Ḥaqq of the Merchant Abū Hurayrah’). Archiv Für Papyrusforschung 60 (2): 406–412.
Younes, Khaled. 2013. “Textile Trade between the Fayyūm and Fusṭāṭ in the IIIrd/IXth Century According to the Banū ʿAbd al-Muʾmin Archive”. In Anne Regourd (ed.), Documents et Histoire Islam, VIIe-XVIe Siècle: Actes Des Premières Journées d’étude Internationales, École Pratique Des Hautes Études, IVe Section, Musée Du Louvre, Département Des Arts de l’Islam (‘Document and History of Islam, 8th-16th Century: Proceedings of the First International Study Days, École Pratique des Haute Études, 4th section, Louvre Museum, Department of Islamic Art’), 313–334. 16–17 May 2008. Paris. Genève: Libraire Droz.
