The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the potential of integrating Bourdieu’s
notions of field and capital in discursive analyses of language policy. The
paper presents an analysis of a debate in a committee session of the Slovene
parliament, where different actors negotiated about the contents of a language
policy strategy. The study draws on nexus analysis by focussing on the situated
nature of discursive actions in particular settings, and presents a historical
ethnography which combines analysis of transcripts with interviews and a
detailed examination of policy documents. The analysis uncovers the efforts of
actors to legitimize their authority and achieve their goals with the support of
capital accumulated in different fields, and focusses particularly on the
dynamics involved in translating the value of sources of capital across the
borders of different fields.
1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barakos, Elizabeth, and Johann W. Unger
eds.2016Discursive Approaches to Language Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1984Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1986 “The forms of capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John G. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1993The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.
1994 “Conversationalization of public discourse and the authority of
the consumer.” In The Authority of the Consumer, edited by Russell Keat, Nigel Whiteley, and Nicholas Abercrombie, 235–241. New York: Routledge.
Flowerdew, John
2012Critical Discourse Analysis in Historiography: The Case of Hong Kong’s
Evolving Political Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Christian Schneickert
2016 “Collective learning in social fields: Bourdieu, Habermas and
critical discourse studies.” Discourse and Society 27 (3): 293–307.
Galasinska, Aleksandra, and Michał Krzyżanowski
eds.2009Discourse and Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Geiger, R. Stuart, and Ribes, David
2011 “Trace Ethnography: Following Coordination through Documentary
Practices.” In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems
Science, Koloa, Kauai, HI, 1–10. Retrieved from [URL]
Habermas, Jürgen
1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a
Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Heer, Hannes, Walter Manoschek, Alexander Pollak, and Ruth Wodak
2008The Discursive Construction of History: Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War
of Annihilation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hornberger, Nancy H.
2005 “Opening and filling up implementational and ideological spaces in
heritage language education.” Modern Language Journal 89 (4): 605–609.
Hult, Francis M.
2010 “Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space
and time.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2021: 7–24.
Hult, Francis M.
2015 “Making Policy Connections across Scales Using Nexus
Analysis.” In Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning, edited by Francis M. Hult, and David C. Johnson, 217–232. Maiden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Jenkins, Richard
2007 “The meaning of policy/policy as meaning.” In Policy Reconsidered: Meanings, Politics and Practices, edited by Susan M. Hodgson, and Zoe Irving, 21–36. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Jessop, Bob
2014 “Repoliticising depoliticisation: theoretical preliminaries on some responses to the American fiscal and Eurozone debt crises.” Policy and Politics 42 (2): 207–223.
Johnson, David C., and Eric J. Johnson
2015 “Power and agency in language policy appropriation.” Language Policy 14 (3): 221–243.
Johnson, David C.
2011 “Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language
policy.” Critical Discourse Studies 8 (4): 267–279.
2016 “Discursive mechanisms and human agency in language policy
formation: negotiating bilingualism and parallel language use at a Swedish
university.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 191: 1–17.
Koller, Veronika, and Peter Davidson
2008 “Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: a
cross-genre study of British policy-making.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 307–331.
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak
2011 “Political strategies and language policies: the European Union
Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and
multilingualism policy.” Language Policy 10 (2): 115–136.
2014 “Values, imaginaries and templates of journalistic practice: A
critical discourse analysis.” Social Semiotics 241: 345–365.
Levinson, Bradley, Margaret Sutton, and Teresa Winstead
2009 “Educational Policy as a Practice of Power: Theoretical Tool,
Ethnographic Methods, Democratic Options.” Educational Policy 23 (6): 767–795.
Lipsky, Michael
2010Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public
Services (30th anniversary expanded edition). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hilgers, Mathieu, and Éric Mangez
2014 “Introduction to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of social
fields.” In Field Theory: Concepts and Applications, edited by Mathieu Hilgers, and Éric Mangez, 1–36. London: Routledge.
Maton, Karl
2005 “A question of autonomy: Bourdieu’s field approach and higher
education policy.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (6): 687–704.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2015 “The discourse-historical approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: SAGE.
Savski, Kristof
2016 “Analysing voice in language policy: plurality and conflict in
Slovene government documents.” Language Policy 15 (4): 505–524.
Savski, Kristof
2017 “Language policy at times of instability and struggle: The impact
of fluctuating will and competing agendas on a Slovene language
strategy.” Current Issues in Language Planning 18 (3): 283–302.
Savski, Kristof
In press. “Monolingualism and prescriptivism: the ecology of Slovene in the
20th Century.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Scollon
2004Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge.
Scollon, Ron
1998Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News
Discourse. London: Longman.
Scollon, Ron
2001aMediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London: Routledge.
Scollon, Ron
2001b “Action and text: towards an integrated understanding of the place
of text in social (inter)action, mediated discourse analysis and the problem
of social action.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 139–183. London: SAGE.
Scollon, Ron
2008Analyzing Public Discourse: Discourse Analysis in the Making of Public
Policy. London: Routledge.
1993 “Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: a
synopsis.” Discourse and Society 4 (2): 193–223.
Vaughan, Diane
2004 “Theorizing disaster: Analogy, historical ethnography and the
Challenger accident.” Ethnography 5 (3): 315–347.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2015 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and
Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–22. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Wodak, Ruth
2000 “From conflict to consensus? The co-construction of a policy
paper.” In European Union Discourses on Un/employment: An Interdisciplinary
Approach to Employment, Policy-making and Organizational Change, edited by Peter Muntigl, Gilbert Weiss, and Ruth Wodak, 73–114. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wodak, Ruth
2011The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, Ruth
2015The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity (2nd edition). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Savski, Kristof
2020. Local problems and a global solution: examining the recontextualization of CEFR in Thai and Malaysian language policies. Language Policy 19:4 ► pp. 527 ff.
Savski, Kristof
2020. Polyphony and polarization in public discourses: hegemony and dissent in a Slovene policy debate. Critical Discourse Studies 17:4 ► pp. 377 ff.
2023. Negotiating hegemonies in language policy: ideological synergies in media recontextualizations of audit culture. Current Issues in Language Planning 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Savski, Kristof
2024. Language policy from textuality to (re)entextualization: expanding the toolkit for discursive analyses. Language Policy 23:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.