This paper explores how what is both appropriate to and excluded from consideration in a given episode of talk involving question-and-answers between a speaker and audience is the outcome of complex negotiation. We consider the details of such collaborative work in talk at a press conference with the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, in discussion concerning his own and other countries’ military involvement in the Middle East. What gets excluded from consideration in the talk is itself established in dialogic interaction where the problematic nature of inferences potentially made relevant to the discussion is highlighted by reporters and brought to account by the Prime Minister. This feature of dialogue is related to recent scholarly debate regarding the place that context of controversy and the implicit availability of meaning should play in an analysis of talk, where what does not get said features as of equal importance as what does get said. We explore how the questions at issue in just such debates get taken up as participant concerns, pursued as a practical order of business in efforts where principal speakers work to foreclose the inferential potential otherwise opened up by audience scrutiny.
1979Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
Bakhtin, M. M
1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. (Ed.). C. Emerson, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M
1984Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics. (Ed.). and trans. C. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Billig, M
1985Prejudice, categorisation and particularisation: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology 151, 79–103.
Billig, M
1992Talking of the Royal Family. London: Routledge.
Billig, M
1996Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, new edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M
1999aWhose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society 10(4), 543–582.
Billig, M
1999bConversation analysis and the claims of naivety. Discourse & Society 10(4), 571–576.
Brockmeier, J. and Harré, R
1997Narrative: Problems and promises of an alternative paradigm. Research on Language and Social Interaction 341, 263–283.
Bull, P
1994On identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 131, 115–131.
Clark, K. and Holquist, M
1984Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clayman, S. and Whalen, J
1988When the medium becomes the message: The case of the Rather-Bush encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction 221, 214–272.
Edmondson, W
1981Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.
Edwards, D
1997Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J
1992Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Foucault, M
1980The eye of power. In: C. Gordon (ed.). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 146–165.
Galasinski, D
2000The Language of Deception: A Discourse Analytical Study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Garfinkel, H
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H
2002Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. (Ed.). A. Rawls. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Gergen, K. J
1982Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Holquist, M
1990Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London: Routledge.
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S. and Levine, M
1997On the parallels between social cognition and the ‘New Racism’. British Journal of Social Psychology 361, 305–329.
Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R
1998Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jefferson, G
1985An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. III: Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press, 25–34.
Latour, B
2004Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 301, 225–247.
Lynch, M. and Bogen, D
1996The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
McKenzie, K
2003Discursive Psychology and the ‘New Racism’. Human Studies 261, 461–491.
Mehan, H. and Wood, H
1975The Reality of Ethnomethodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
1990Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A and Jefferson, G
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4), 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A
1988From interview to confrontation: Observations of the Bush/Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction 221, 215–240.
Schegloff, E. A
1992On talk and its institutional occasions. In: P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–134.
Schegloff, E. A
1997Whose text? Whose context?Discourse & Society 8(2), 165–187.
Schegloff, E. A
1998Reply to Wetherell [1998] Discourse & Society 9(3), 413–416.
Schegloff, E. A
1999a‘Schegloff ’s texts’ as ‘Billig’s data’: A critical reply. Discourse & Society 10(4), 58–72.
Schegloff, E. A
1999bNaivete vs. sophistocation or discipline vs. self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig [1999b]. Discourse & Society 10(4), 577–582.
Schwartz, H
1971Mental Disorder and the Study of Subjective Experience: Some Uses of Each to Elucidate the Other. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Schwartz, H
n.d.. )Towards a Phenomenology of Projection Errors. Unpublished paper. Department of Sociology, Harvard University.
Sharrock, W. and Anderson, R. J
1987Epilogue: The definition of alternatives: Some sources of confusion in interdisciplinary discussion. In: G. Button and R. E. Lee, Talk and Social Organisation. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters Ltd., 290–321.
Sharrock, W. and Button, G
1991The social actor: Social action in real time. In: G. Button (ed.). Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–175.
Shotter, J. and Billig, M
1998A Bakhtinian psychology: From out of the heads of individuals and into the dialogues between them. In: M. M. Bell and M. Gardiner (eds). Bakhtin and the Human Sciences: No Last Words. London: Sage, 13–29.
Tsuda, Y
1986Language, Inequality and Distortion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wetherell, M
1998Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society 9(3), 387–412.
Wetherell, M
2001Debates in Discourse Research. In: M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S. J. Yates (eds). Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage, 380–399.
Wowk, M. T. and Carlin, A. P
2004Depicting a liminal position in ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis: The work of Rod Watson. Human Studies 27(1), 69–89.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Braman, Sandra
2007. When Nightingales Break the Law: Silence and the Construction of Reality. Ethics and Information Technology 9:4 ► pp. 281 ff.
Ikeanyibe, Okey Marcellus, Christian Chukwuebuka Ezeibe, Peter Oluchukwu Mbah & Chikodiri Nwangwu
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.