Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 8:1 (2009) ► pp.28–51

Circulation of the World War II / Holocaust analogy in the 1999 Kosovo intervention

Articulating a vocabulary for international conflict

| School of Communication Studies, Ohio University

This essay offers an analysis of the circulation of World War II and Holocaust analogies in discourses about American military involvement in Kosovo. The essay argues that the World War II/Holocaust analogy provided the public with a new vocabulary for understanding the situation in Kosovo. The essay uses Bill Clinton’s speeches about Kosovo during the first week of American intervention as a representative anecdote for discussing the analogy and its rhetorical force. The essay then probes the circulation of the analogy in other governmental, media, and public opinion outlets. By comparing Kosovo 1999 to Europe 1945, the analogy offers descriptive and prescriptive reasons for American involvement that encourage public approval of military intervention. The essay offers conclusions and implications of this analysis for the understanding of the relationships among rhetoric, public opinion, and international conflict.

Keywords: Analogy, rhetoric and public address, international conflict, Kosovo, Bill Clinton
Published online: 1 April 2009
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.1.03bat
References
Anderson, William D., and Kernek, Sterling J
1985 How “realistic” is Reagan’s diplomacy? Political Science Quarterly 100(3), 389—409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babington, Charles and Dewar, Helen
1999, March 24. President pleads for support. Washington Post, A1.Google Scholar
Baird, A. Craig
1950 Argumentation, Discussion, and Debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Beck, Robert J
1989 Munich’s lessons reconsidered. International Security 14(2), 161—191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bombing begins: If Kosovo is so important, why not plan on ground troops?
1999, March 25. Newsday, A54.Google Scholar
Branham, Robert J
1991 Debate and Critical Analysis: The Harmony of Conflict. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth
1969 Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Can NATO airstrikes convince Serbs to discuss peace in Kosovo?
1999, March 29. CNN Talk-Back Live, Transcript # 99032900V14.Google Scholar
CBS poll: Support grows for strikes
1999, April 7. Available: [URL].Google Scholar
Conflict in Kosovo
1999, March 29. FOX Hannity and Colmes, Transcript # 032901cb.253.Google Scholar
Cullen, Kevin
1999, March 27. Despite memories of WWII, a return to combat. Boston Globe, A8.Google Scholar
Dauber, Cori
2001 The shots seen ‘round the world: The impact of the Mogadishu photographs on American foreign policy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 4(4), 653—687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Decker, Cathleen
1999, March 26. Public narrowly backs US role in airstrikes. Available: LATimes.com.Google Scholar
DeRouen, Karl R.
, Jr 1995 The indirect link: Politics, the economy and the use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 39(4), 671—696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dutter, Lee E
1991 The seventy-five years’ war, 1914—1989: Some observations on the psychology of American foreign policy-making during the 20th century. Political Psychology 12(3), 523—553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray
1998 Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ehninger, Douglas, and Brockriede, Wayne
(1963) Decision by Debate. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
Elliott, Michael
1999, April 5. Mission: Uncertain. Newsweek 1341, 29.Google Scholar
Escaping the horrors of Kosovo
1999, March 29. ABC World News Tonight, Transcript # 99032903-j04.Google Scholar
Freeley, Austin J
1993 Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Hedges, Chris
1999, March 28. The world: Fog of war. New York Times, D1 .Google Scholar
Hoffman, Stanley
1977 The hell of good intentions. Foreign Policy 291, 3—26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R
1992 Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippman consensus. International Studies Quarterly 36(4), 439—466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Ann: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
James, Patrick, and O’Neal, John R
1991 The influence of domestic and international politics on the president’s use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35(2), 307—333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert
1976 Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong
1992 Analogies at war: Korean, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Seduction by analogy in Vietnam: The Malaya and Korea analogies. In: G. John Ikenberry (ed.). American Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays. New York: Long-man, 523—532.Google Scholar
Kosovo 101
1999, March 26. Times Union, A10.Google Scholar
Kosovo Conflict
1999, Mar 23. Fox: The Crier Report, Transcript # 032301cb.252.Google Scholar
Kosovo: Press on
1999, March 26. Los Angeles Times, B6.Google Scholar
Kosovo’s tragedy: NATO must prevent a wider Balkan war
1999, March 30. San Diego Union-Tribune. B6—8.Google Scholar
Langer, Gary
1999a, March 17. Americans oppose bombing. Available: ABCNews.com.Google Scholar
1999b, March 27. American support grows. Available: ABCNews.com.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S
1994 Learning and foreign policy: Sweeping a conceptual minefield. International Organization 48(2), 279—312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lian, Bradley, and O’Neal, John
1993 The president’s use of military force and public opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution 37(2), 277—301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Los Angeles Times
1999 Study #425: Los Angeles Times poll alert. Los Los: Times-Mirror Corporation.Google Scholar
Lynch, Colum
1999, March 26. Parallel cited by US is doubted. Boston Globe, A14.Google Scholar
Matray, James I
1979 Truman’s plan for victory: National self-determination and the thirty-eighth parallel decision in Korea. Journal of American History 66(2), 314—333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, Ernest
1973 Lessons of the Past: The Use and Misuse of History in American Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCroskey, James C., and Combs, Walter H
1969 The effects of the use of analogy on attitude change and source credibility. Journal of Communication 19(4), 333—339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miga, Andrew
1999, March 25. Kosovo crisis: Clinton prepares nation for long attack. Boston Herald, 4.Google Scholar
Monroe, Alan D
1998 Public opinion and public policy, 1980—1993. Public Opinion Quarterly 62(1), 6—28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, and Bickers, Kenneth N
1992 Domestic discontent and the external use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(1), 25—53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, John E
1973 War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
NATO changes tactics
1999, March 29. CBS This Morning, 7:00 A.M. ET.Google Scholar
No quick fixes can be promised in Kosovo
1999, March 26. Dayton Daily News, 14A.Google Scholar
Noon, David Hoogland
2004 Operation enduring analogy: World War II, the war on terror, and the uses of historical memory. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 7(2), 339—366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Charles, W., Jr., and Job, Brian L
1986 The president and the political use of force. American Political Science Review 80(2), 541—566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papandreou, Margarita
1999 The war that should not have been. New Perspectives Quarterly 16(5), 41—43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie
1969 The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Notre: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Leslie, Hicks, William S., and Springer, Douglas R
1996 Basic Debate (4th ed) New York: NTC.Google Scholar
Pinkerton, James B
1999, March 26. Conflicting lessons of war. Minneapolis Star-Tribune, 29A1.Google Scholar
Powell, Stewart M, and Freedman, Dan
1999, March 25. Clinton cites WWII in justifying strikes. New Orleans Times-Picayune, A7.Google Scholar
Pristina in chaos 1999, March 28. ABC World News Sunday, Transcript # 99032803-j06.Google Scholar
Refugees fleeing Serbia as bombing continues
1999, March 29. NBC Nightly News, 6:30 P.M. ET.Google Scholar
Report from Kosovo
1999, March 26. ABC World News Tonight, Transcript # 99032602-j04. Google Scholar
Rock, William R
1997 Appeasement. In The encyclopedia of U.S. foreign relations (Vol. 11, pp. 84—85). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J. Philipp
1986 Presidential beliefs and foreign policy decision-making: Continuity during the Cold War era. Political Psychology 7(4), 733—751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce
1990 Economic decline, electoral pressure, and the initiation of external conflict. In: Charles S. Gochman and Alan Ned Sabosky (eds.). The Prisoners of War. Lexington: Lexington Books, 123—140.Google Scholar
Sacksteder, William
1974 The logic of analogy. Philosophy and Rhetoric 7(4), 234—252.Google Scholar
1979 Analogy: Justification for logic. Philosophy and Rhetoric 12(1), 21—40.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert L., and Klumpp, James F
1984 A dear searcher for comparisons: The rhetoric of Ellen Goodman. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70(1), 69—79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Secretary Albright Denounces Yugoslav President’s Ethnic Cleansing in Kosovo
1999, March 23. Larry King Live, Transcript # 99032300V22.Google Scholar
Shepard, Scott
1999, March 29. NATO goes after tanks, troops. Atlanta Journal and Constitution. 1A.Google Scholar
Snow, Tony
1999, March 25. A war to save face. Denver Post, B11.Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. and Paul Diesing
1977 Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stables, Gordon Wilson
1998 The Lessons of Vietnam as an American Social Myth: President Clinton’s Campaign for a Bosnian Troop Deployment. MA MA: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Stakeout remarks by Senator Patrick Leahy
1999, March 23. Federal News Service, wire.Google Scholar
Stuckey, Mary E
1992 Remembering the future: Rhetorical echoes of World War II and Vietnam in George Bush’s public speech on the Gulf War. Communication Studies 43(4), 246—256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The bombing begins
1999, March 24. Newshour with Jim Lehrer, Transcript #6391.Google Scholar
The crisis in Kosovo
1999, March 24. ABC Nightline, Transcript # 99032401-j07.Google Scholar
Thompson, Kenneth W
1981 Power, force, and diplomacy. Review of Politics 43(3), 410—435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
USA Today/CNN/Gallup
1999, April 8. USA Today/CNN/Gallup poll results. [URL]. Google Scholar
Vertzberger, Yaacov Y. I
1990 The World in Their Minds: Information Processing, Cognition, and Perception in Foreign Policy Decision-Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vosniadou, Stella and Andrew Ortony
1989 Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walt, Steven M
2000 Two cheers for Clinton’s foreign policy. Foreign Affairs 79(1), 63—79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Why America had no choice but to go to war in Kosovo
1999, March 28. 60 Minutes, 7:00 P.M. ET.Google Scholar
Yugoslav President Solobodan Milosevic
1999, March 25. ABC Good Morning America, Transcript # 99032515-j01. Speeches Google Scholar
Clinton, William J
1999b, March 24. Statement by the President to the Nation (1). Available: [URL].Google Scholar
1999c, March 24. Statement by the President to the Nation (2). Available: [URL].Google Scholar
1999d, March 25. Videotaped Remarks by the President to the Serbian People. Available: [URL].Google Scholar
1999e, March 27. Radio Address of the President to the Nation. Available: [URL].Google Scholar
1999f, March 30. Remarks by the President at electronic Industries Alliance Dinner. Available: [URL].Google Scholar
Clinton, William. J
1999a, March 23. Remarks by the President to AFSCME Biennial Convention. Available: [URL].Google Scholar
DoD news briefing
1999a, March 23. Department of Defense. Available: [URL]Google Scholar
1999b, March 24. Department of Defense. Available: [URL]Google Scholar
Press briefing by Joe Lockhart
1999a, March 29. Office of the White House Press Secretary. >Available: [URL]Google Scholar
1999b, March 24. Office of the White House Press Secretary. Available: [URL]Google Scholar
Press conference on “Kosovo”
1999, March 25. Office of the Spokesman, U.S. Department of State. [URL]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Drury, Jeffrey P. Mehltretter
2018. Beyond “Rhetorical Agency”: Skutnik’s Story in the 1982 State of the Union Address. Western Journal of Communication 82:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Kushi, Sidita
2023. JUST ANOTHER CIVIL WAR?. World Affairs 186:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Lynch, John A., Aaron J. Goldenberg, Nanibaa’ A. Garrison & Kyle B. Brothers
2020. Analogies in Genomics Policymaking: Debates and Drawbacks. The American Journal of Human Genetics 107:5 ► pp. 797 ff. DOI logo
Makhortykh, Mykola
2020. Historical memory and securitisation of the Russian intervention in Syria. International Politics 57:6 ► pp. 1063 ff. DOI logo
Oleinik, Anton
2015. The language of power: a content analysis of presidential addresses in North America and the Former Soviet Union, 1993–2012. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2015:236 DOI logo
Pérez Rastrilla, Laura
2021. A Proposal for a Qualitative Analysis of the Media Discourse on the Bombing of Yugoslavia. In Researching Yugoslavia and its Aftermath [Societies and Political Orders in Transition, ], ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Rimaitė-Beržiūnienė, Viktorija
2022. Visual Securitization: Commemorating the Partisan War in Lithuanian Foreign and Security Policy. Politologija 106:2 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Valentino, Benjamin A. & Ethan M. Weinberg
2017. More than words? “Genocide,” Holocaust analogies, and public opinion in the United States. Journal of Human Rights 16:3 ► pp. 276 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.