Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 8:1 (2009) ► pp.97–111

A Jewish and democratic state

The Zionist basis for territorial concessions

| University of Haifa

The two Palestinian uprisings have brought about an ideological shift in Israel’s view of the solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The time has ripened for an open debate about ending the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian Occupied Territories. The debate has limited discursive boundaries, set up by the catch phrase “a Jewish and democratic state”. This article discusses some points of view within this discourse and exemplifies those that remain outside it.

Keywords: discursive strategies, Jewish, democratic, Intifada, Zionism
Published online: 1 April 2009
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.1.06kuz
References
Abu-Sitta, Salman H
2001 The End of the Palestinian—Israeli Conflict: From Refugees to Citizens at Home. London: Palestine Land Society and Palestine Return Centre.Google Scholar
Aloni, Shulamit
2003 Our foppish self-righteousness. Haaretz, 23.7.2003.Google Scholar
Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov
2005 Paradigmatic changes in the Israeli conception of the management and resolution of the Israeli—Palestinian dispute [Hebrew], Lecture given on the occasion of the publication of his edited volume The Israeli Palestinian Dispute: From a Peace Process to a Violent conflict 2000—2005.Google Scholar
Burg, Avraham
2007 lenaceax et hitler [Defeating Hitler]. Tel-Aviv: Miskal � Yedioth Ahronoth and Chemed Books.Google Scholar
Cook, Jonathan
2006 Blood and Religion: The Unmasking of the Jewish and Democratic State. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Uri
2003 Apartheid Israel. Pretoria, London, New-York: Media Review Network and Zed Books.Google Scholar
Herut Platform
2007 [URL].Google Scholar
Horowitz, Ellen W
2007 The goy as godhead. Israelinsider. [URL]Google Scholar
Illatov, Robert
2007 [URL].Google Scholar
Israel Beytenu Platform
2007 [URL]Google Scholar
Kuzar, Ron
2008a The term Return in the Palestinian discourse on the right of return. Discourse & Society 19(5): 629—644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Palestine, Michigan: A return address. Israel Studies in Language and Society 1(1): 117—134.Google Scholar
Mualem, Mazal
2006 MK Gal’on: Heider and Le Pen are vegetarians next to Lieberman. Haaretz: 29.10.2006Google Scholar
Levanon, Noa
2007 Anti-Zionism by “progressive” Jews: Interview with Professor AlvinGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld
YNet. [URL]
Remnick, David
2007 “The Apostate: A Zionist politician loses faith in the future”. The New Yorker. 30.7.2007. [URL]Google Scholar
Rawidowicz, Simon
1957 Bavel viyrushalayim. Babylon and Jerusalem. Towards a philosophy of Israel’s wholeness. London: Waltham.Google Scholar
Shavit, Ari
2007 “get kritut” [Divorce certificate]. Haaretz. [URL]. 7.6.2007Google Scholar
Stav, Arie
(ed 2001 Israel and a Palestinian State: Zero Sum Game? Zmora-Bitan and Ariel Center for Policy Research.Google Scholar
UN Report
1950 United Nations General Progress Report and Supplementary Report of the United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Kuzar, Ron
2011. The subversive agent: Anatomy of personal ideological change. Semiotica 2011:185 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.