Discursive production of teaching quality assessment report
A Critical Discourse Analysis
Hailong Tian | Tianjin University of Commerce and Lancaster University
To produce a teaching quality assessment (TQA) report in the TQA practice launched by the Chinese Ministry of Education the assessing group is naturally in an authoritative position, but the assessed university does not remain absolutely passive and dominated. To investigate this struggle of power over each other in producing the TQA report, the present research examines the discourse aspect of the TQA practice by observing the discursive strategies each party deployed. It is found that both parties resort to institutional power in their discourse practice, and that the assessed university incorporates promotional genres into its self-assessment discourse while the assessing group recontextualises the promotional statement in its authoritative TQA report. It is concluded, based on this case study, that the assessing group’s authoritative TQA report is largely influenced by the self-assessment of the assessed university.
1999Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Blommaert, Jan.
2005Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1991Language and Symbolic Power. London: Polity Press.
Eggins, Suzanne and Martin, Jim.
1997Genres and registers of discourse. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage, 230–256.
Fairclough, Norman.
1989Language and Power. London and New York: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman
2001The discourse of new Labour: Critical discourse analysis. In: Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates (eds.). Discourse as Data. London: Sage in association with The Open University, 229–266.
Fairclough, Norman.
2003Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth.
1997Critical discourse analysis. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258–284.
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth.
2001Discourse and Discrimination. London and New York: Routledge.
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth.
2009Discourse-historical approach. In: Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd edition). London: Sage, 87–121.
Tian, Hailong.
2009Discourse Studies: Categories, Perspectives and Methodologies. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1993Principles of critical discourse analysis. In: Michael Toolan (ed.). Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Concepts in Linguistics (vol.II1). London and New York: Routledge, 104–141.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2008Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
1993Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: A synopsis. In: Michael Toolan (ed.). Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Concepts in Linguistics (vol.II1). London and New York: Routledge, 166–199.
Fawunmi, Mayowa Owolabi, Ajibola Samuel Ogundare & Tolulope Deborah Iredele
2023. Visuality, Professionalism, and Branding. In Transformation of Higher Education Through Institutional Online Spaces [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ], ► pp. 263 ff.
Ho, Victor
2020. Marketization attempts by universities in Hong Kong: An appraisal analysis of institutional responses to quality audit evaluations. Lingua 237 ► pp. 102811 ff.
Shahnaz, Ambreen, M. Abid & N. Kanwal
2023. Impact of marketization on the interpersonal relation between the university and students in modern university prospectuses. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education► pp. 1 ff.
Shahnaz, Ambreen & Nazia Suleman
2023. Semiotic analysis of university prospectuses in Pakistan: marketization, identity, and power dynamics. Social Semiotics► pp. 1 ff.
2012. Discourse and marketization of higher education in China: The genre of advertisements for academic posts. Discourse & Society 23:3 ► pp. 318 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.