Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse and Socio-Political Transformations in Contemporary China
Edited by Paul Chilton, Hailong Tian and Ruth Wodak
[Journal of Language and Politics 9:4] 2010
► pp. 593–614

Discursive construction of Chinese foreign policy

A diachronic analysis of the Chinese government’s Annual Work Report to the NPC

| Fujian Normal University and Guangdong University of Foreign Studies

The article carries out a diachronic analysis of the topics and schemata of foreign policy sections (FPSs) in the Chinese government’s Annual Work Report (AWR, 1993–2007) to the National People’s Congress (NPC). The analysis shows that: (1) all the reports are constructed with similar topics and schemata decided by the general rules set in the FPS of the report in 1986, which work as “orders of discourse”; (2) topical selection and schematic structure, as two sides of a mental model for the production and understanding of the discourse, are ideological mechanisms for the government to manipulate power control over policy construction and implementation; (3) the discourse is actually the final product of the struggle and interaction between new discourse and “orders of discourse”; (4) the discourse is a reflection of social changes and works as a catalyst to shape people’s view toward social reality and to mold China’s foreign policy practice.

Keywords: CDA, foreign policy, diachronic analysis, Annual Work Report, discursive strategies
Published online: 7 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.4.07you
References
Berkenkotter, Carol. & Huckin, Thomas N.
1995 Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
(ed.) 1985a Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul.
1985b Words, discourse and metaphors: The meanings of deter, deterrent and deterrence. In: Paul Chilton (ed.). Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate. London: Pinter, 103–127.Google Scholar
1990 Politeness and Politics. Discourse & Society 1(2), 201–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2003 Deixis and distance: President Clinton’s justification of intervention in Kosovo. In: Mirjana N. Dedaic & Daniel N. Nelson (eds). At War with Words. NY: Mouton de Gruyter, 95–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. & Lakoff, George
1995 Foreign policy by metaphor. In: C. Schäffner and A. Wenden (eds). Language and Peace. Asdershot: Dartmouth, 37–59.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. & Schäffner, Christina
eds Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse Amsterdam John Benjamins Publishing Company DOI logo
Crowley, D. & Mitchell, D.
(eds) 1993 Communication Theory Today. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Dedaic, Mirjana N. & Nelson, Daniel N.
(eds) 2003 At War with Words. NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, Jianxin & Liao Yiqing
2006 Lingusitic Research from Critical Perspective. Guangzhou: Sun Yet-sen University Press. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman.
1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman & Wodak, Ruth
1997 Critical discourse analysis. In: T. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction (Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol.2). London: Sage Publications, 259–584.Google Scholar
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., and Trew, T.
1979 Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Geis, M.
1987 The Language of Politics. NY: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Chunyang.
2006 Discourse Analysis: A New Approach to Communication Studies. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Ji, Yuhua.
2007 Critical Discourse Analysis in Intercultural Communication Research and Education. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochvíl, P., Cibulková, P., and Beneš, V.
2006 Foreign policy, rhetorical action and the idea of otherness: The Czech Republic and Russia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 391, 497–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R.
1990 Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives. USA: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
Pan, Guang.
2006a On the basis and potential for China-Arab relations to develop in the new century. In: Dunxin Xu (ed.). International Situation and China’s Peaceful Development. Beijing: World Knowledge Press, 160–166. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
2006b The role of “Shanghai Cooperation Organization” in China’s peaceful development. In: Dunxin Xu (ed.). International Situation and China’s Peaceful Development. Beijing: World Knowledge Press, 194–208. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Peng, Qing.
2005 On China’s multilateral foreign policy: Viewed from reports on the work of the government: 1986–2005. Foreign Affairs Review (China) 41, 50–56. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Pu, Xingzu
(ed.) 2002 Political System of People’s Republic of China. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing.
2000 Foreword to Chinese version of Social Theory of International Politics. In: Alexander Wendt. Social theory of International Politics (Chinese Version). Yaqing Qin Trans. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House. [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Ruan, Zhongze.
2006 “To establish a harmonious world” — A projection of Chinese foreign policy shift. In: Dunxin, Xu (ed.). International Situation and China’s Peaceful Development. Beijing: World Knowledge Press, 89–92. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Schäffner C. and Wenden, A.
(eds) 1995 Language and Peace. Asdershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Steiner, E.
1985 The concept of context and the theory of action. In: Paul Chilton (ed.). Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate. London: Pinter, 213–217.Google Scholar
Sun, Jisheng.
2007 The linguistic turn of international relations and its influence on constructivism: Language games as an example. Foreign Affairs Review (China), 37–45. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Swales, John
2003 Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Tian, Hailong.
2009 Discourse Studies: Categories, Perspectives and Methodologies. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
van Dijk, T.
1981 Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. Netherlands: Mouton Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Discourse and cognition in society. In: D. Crowley & D. Mitchell (eds). Communication Theory Today. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 107–126.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1997 Discourse as Social Interaction (Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol.2). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
2002 Political discourse and political cognition. In: Paul Chilton & Christina Schäffner (eds). Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 204–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef & Östman, JanOla
(eds) 2006 Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander.
2000 Social Theory of International Politics (Chinese Version). Yaqing Qin Trans. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House. [in Chinese].Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth.
2006 Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In: Jef Verschueren & JanOla Östman (eds). Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xin, Bin.
2005 Critical Linguistics: Theory and Practice. Shanghai: Foreign Language Education Press. [In Chinese]Google Scholar
Xu, Dunxin
(ed.) 2006 International Situation and China’s Peaceful Development. Beijing: World Knowledge Press. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Zheng, Hua.
2005 Discourse analysis and international relations: The influence of Foucauldian “discourse” upon postmodern international theory. Journal of Modern International Relations (China) (41), 56–62. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
2006 An interpretation of Bush’s China trip in 2005: A discourse analysis of three news conferences hosted by the US. International Forum (China) 8(2), 26–32. [in Chinese]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Li, Chien-pin
2015. New Leaders with Old Lenses? China’s Conflict Frames Toward Taiwan, 2003–2013. Journal of Chinese Political Science 20:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Mokry, Sabine
2024. China’s foreign policy rhetoric between orchestration and cacophony. The Pacific Review 37:2 ► pp. 360 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.