Part of
The Determinants of Diachronic Stability
Edited by Anne Breitbarth, Miriam Bouzouita, Lieven Danckaert and Melissa Farasyn
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 254] 2019
► pp. 245262
References
Bailey, Laura, Wallenberg, Joel C. & van der Wurff, Wim
2012Embedded yes/no questions: reanalysis and replacement. Paper presented at Presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain (LAGB), University of Salford.
Baker, Mark
2008The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 351–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, Walker, Steven, Bojesen Christensen, Rune Haubo, Singmann, Henrik, Dai, Bin, Grothendieck, Gabor, Green, Peter & Maintainer Ben Bolker
2014Package ‘lme4’. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Bion, Ricardo A. H., Borovsky, Arielle & Fernald, Anne
2013Fast mapping, slow learning: Disambiguation of novel word-object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30 months. Cognition 126: 39–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V.
1987The Principle of Contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, The 20th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, Brian MacWhinney (ed.), 1–33. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1990On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17: 417–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ecay, Aaron
2015The Penn-York Computer-annotated Corpus of a Large amount of English based on the TCP (PYCCLE-TCP). Public release 1. [URL]
Fruehwald, Josef & Wallenberg, Joel C.
2013Optionality is stable variation is competing grammars. Presented at 25th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Formal Ways of Analyzing Variation (FWAV) Workshop.
In preparation. Optionality is stable variation is competing grammars.
Kauhanen, Henri
2017Neutral change. Journal of Linguistics 21(2): 339–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren
2004Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English, release 3. Size 1.8 Million Words.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S.
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S., Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel
2010Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. Size 950000 words.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S. & Taylor, Ann
2000Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English. CD-ROM. 2nd edn. Size 1.3 million words.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1945La nature des procès dits ‘analogiques’. Acta Linguistica 5: 15–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1985On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3: 217–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markman, Ellen M. & Wachtel, Gwyn F.
1988Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20:121–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moran, Patrick Alfred Pierce
1958Random processes in genetics. In Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 54: 60–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank
2003The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. [URL]
Wallenberg, Joel C.
2016Extraposition is disappearing. Language 92: e237–e256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Hadley
2009ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York NY: Springer. [URL] DOI logo
Yang, Charles
2000Internal and external forces in language change. Language Variation and Change 12: 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar