Cover not available

To be specified published In: Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 41:1 (2018) ► pp.152159

References (33)
References
Ágel, V. (2000). Valenztheorie. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ágel, V., Eichinger, L., Eroms, H. -W., Hellwig, P., Heringer, H. -J., & Lobin, H. (Eds.). (2003). Dependenz und Valenz: Ein Internationales Handbuch Der Zeitgenösischen Forschung. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ajdukiewicz, K. (1935). Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosophica, 11, 1–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Askedal, J. O. (1991). Charles S. Peirce’s work on relatives and modern valency grammar. Cruzeiro Semiotico, 151, 69–82.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baum, R. (1976). Dependenzgrammatik: Tesnières Modell der Sprachbeschreibung in wissenschaftsgeschichtlicher und kritischer Sicht. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradford, R. (1994). Roman Jakobson: Life, Language, Art. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell, 6th edition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Groot, A. W. (1949). Structurele Syntaxis. Den Haag: Servire.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engel, U. (2003). Das valenzkonzept in der Grammatikographie: ein Überblick. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp. 1309–1330.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (1997). German-English Verb Valency: A Contrastive Analysis. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellan, L., Malchukov, A., & Cennamo, M. (2017). Issues in contrastive valency studies. In L. Hellan, A. Malchukov, & M. Cennamo (Eds.), Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. O. (1949). The phonemic and grammatical aspects of language and their interaction. In Actes du Sixième Congrès International des Linguistes, (pp. 5–18). Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1965). Quest for the essence of language. Diogenes, 13(51), 21–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1971). Results of a joint conference of anthropologists and linguists. In Selected Writings II, (pp. 554–567). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1977). A few remarks on Peirce, pathfinder in the science of language. MLN, 92(5), 1026–1032. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). The Framework of Language. Michigan Studies in Humanities.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1937). Analytic Syntax. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kacnel’son, S. D. (1948). O grammatičeskoj kategorii. Vestnik Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 21, 114–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). K ponjatiju tipov valentnosti. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 31, 20–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahane, S., & Osborne, T. (2015). Translators’ introduction. In L. Tesnière. (2015), pp. xxix–lxxiii. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liszka, J. J., Battistella, E., & Haley, M. (2006). Linguistics and semiotics II: C. S. Peirce’s influence on 20th-century linguistics. In S. Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, H. -J. Niederehe, & K. Versteegh (Eds.), History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginnings to the Present, (pp. 2589–2599). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luraghi, S., & Parodi, C. (2008). Key Terms in Syntax and Syntactic Theory. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nübler, N. (2003). Kontrastive Fallstudie: Deutsch – Russisch. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp. 1207–1214.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1897). The logic of relatives. The Monist VII(2), 161–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pongó, S. (2003). Die Wertigkeitsmetapher. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp. 7–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preucel, R. W. (2006). Archaeological Semiotics. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schubert, K. (2003). Metataxe: ein Dependenzmodell für die computerlinguistische Praxis. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp. 636–660.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1953). Esquisse d’une Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1959). Éléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Elements of Structural Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, V. S. (2003). Valenz und Sprachtypologie. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp. 444–457.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kruk, Dorota
2025. Wokół pojęcia straty. Analiza semantyczna wybranych jednostek czasownikowych, DOI logo
Creissels, Denis
2024. Transitivity, Valency, and Voice, DOI logo
Banyś, Wiesław
2019. Y a-t-il une relation entre la valence (pleine) et la synonymie?. Neophilologica 31  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue