Article published In:
Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexicon
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 306321
References
Bianchi, C
(Ed.) 2004The semantics/pragmatics distinction. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Comrie, B
1975Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language, 51(2), 406–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G
1979The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics, 15(2), 203–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, O
2000Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In B. Unterbeck, M. Rissanen, T. Nevalainen, & M. Saari (Eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition (pp. 99–115). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enger, H
2004Scandinavian pancake sentences as semantic agreement. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 271, 5–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Scandinavian pancake sentences revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 36(3), 275–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, J., & Sag, I
1976Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7(3), 391–428.Google Scholar
Hock, H. H
2007Agreeing to disagree: Agreement with non-agreeing antecedents, with focus on Sanskrit and Latin. Presentation at East Coast Indo-European Conference, Yale University, June 2007.
Hoffner, H., & Melchert, H. C
2008Hittite grammar. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. A., & Joseph, B. D
2014Limiting the power of zero: Agreement with Sanskrit elliptic duals. Presented at the 88th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Minneapolis, MN, January 4, 2014.
Joseph, B. D
1979On the agreement of reflexive forms in English. Linguistics, 171, 519–23.Google Scholar
Kathol, A
1999Agreement and the syntax-morphology interface in HPSG. In R. D. Levine, & G. M. Green (Eds.), Studies in contemporary phrase structure grammar (pp. 223–274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P
2010Dvandvas, blocking, and the associative: The bumpy ride from phrase to word. Language, 86(2), 302–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliphant, S. G
1912The Vedic dual: Part VI, the elliptic dual; Part VII, the dual dvandva. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 321, 33–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D
2013Что дѣлать? what is to be done? Plenary talk at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 4 January 2013.
Szabo, Z
2005Semantics versus pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A
2008Semantics versus pragmatics. Encyclopaedia of the linguistic sciences: Issues and theories. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A
1987Phonologically conditioned agreement and purely morphological features. Technical report UCSC Syntax Research Center, Report SRC-87-06.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Corbett, Greville G.
2023. The Agreement Hierarchy and (generalized) semantic agreement. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.