Part of
À la recherche de la prédication: Autour des syntagmes prépositionnels
Sous la direction de Christiane Marque-Pucheu, Fryni Kakoyianni-Doa, Peter A. Machonis et Harald Ulland
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 32] 2016
► pp. 5372
References

Références bibliographiques

Bhatt, R
(1997) Obligation and possession. In H. Harley (éd.), The Proceedings of the UPenn/MIT Workshop on Argument Structure and Aspect (=MITWPL 32), 20 pages.Google Scholar
Bjorkman, B.M. & Cowper, E
(2014) Possession and necessity: from individuals to worlds. Ms. présenté au GLOW , Semantics Workshop Possession.
Clech-Darbon, A. et al.
(1999) Are There Cleft Sentences in French? In G. Rebuschi, & L. Tuller, (éds.), The Grammar of Focus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 83–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
C-ORAL-ROM (CORAL) = Cresti, E. / Moneglia, M. (éds.) (2005): C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dassi, M
(2003) De la morphosyntaxe à la sémantique des présentatifs en français contemporain. Une aperception fondée sur la prose romanesque de Mongo Beti. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Doetjes, J., Rebuschi, G. & Rialland, A
(2004) Cleft Sentences. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (éds.), Handbook of French Semantics. Stanford: CSLI, 529–552.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, K
(1998) Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74 (2), 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.-J
(1988) The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 35–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
FRANTEXT Base textuelle FRANTEXT, ATILF – CNRS & Université de Lorraine. Site internet: [URL].
Grevisse, M
(1986) Le bon usage. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
Hamlaoui, F
(2007) French cleft sentences and the syntax-phonology interface. In M. Radišić (éd.), Actes du Congrès annuel de l’Association canadienne de linguistique (ACL) 2007, 11 pages.Google Scholar
Kayne, R
(1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A
(1981) The Notional Category of Modality. In H.J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (éds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K
(1996) Information structure and sentence form: topic focus and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, F.R
(1988) On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3), 335–391.Google Scholar
Léard, J.M
(1992) Les gallicismes. Louvain-La-Neuve: Duculot. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, C
(1999) Le francais en diachronie: douze siècles d’évolution. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Muller, C
(2003) Naissance et évolution des constructions clivées en «c’est…que»: de la focalisation sur l’objet concret à la focalisation fonctionnelle. In P. Blumenthal & J.-E. Tyvaert (éds.), La cognition dans le temps. Etudes cognitives dans le champ historique des langues et des textes. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 101–120.Google Scholar
Partee, B.H
(1987) Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-shifting Principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, & M. Stokhof (éds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Dordrecht: Foris, 115–143.Google Scholar
Percus, O
(1997) Prying open the cleft. In K. Kusumoto (éd.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society , 337–351.
Rouquier, M
(2007) Les constructions clivées en ancien français et en moyen français. Romania 125 (1–2), 167–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, R. & Bildhauer, F
(2012) Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck et al. (éds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation . Istanbul, 486–493.
Williams, E
(1994) Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Zribi-Hertz, A
(2003) On the asymmetrical but regular properties of French possessive DPs. In M. Coene & Y. D’Hulst (éds.), From NP to DP, volume 2: The Expression of Possession in Noun Phrases. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 141–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar