Article In: Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 49:2 (2026) ► pp.318–353
Locations, goals, and endpoints
A delineation of the Mùwe Ké la-don
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper shows a structured functional split for the Mùwe Ké la-don (-na, -la, -ru/du), which previous work grouped under the umbrella term ‘Locative’. Drawing primarily on fifteen texts from elder speakers and authorities on the language, the study examines governing verb type, the nature of marked NPs, the resulting semantic case, and the presence of a definitive endpoint to motion to reveal five distinct case functions. Locative -na marks static location, allative -la a goal of motion without endpoint, and terminative -ru/du a goal of motion with endpoint. Additionally -ru/du marks locations of action with non-motion lexical verbs while -la retains its known dative function. The markers’ connective and temporal functions are also illustrated, demonstrating strong links to these primary case functions. This delineation replaces the idea of free variants with a structured system that provides a stable foundation for future research on Mùwe Ké morphosyntax.
Keywords: Mùwe Ké, Tibeto-Burman, Tibetic, la-don, case marking, locative, allative, terminative, dative, Mugu, Nepal
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Language context and data
- 3.Case functions
- 3.1Locative -na
- 3.2Allative -la
- 3.3Terminative -ru/du
- 3.4Location of action -ru/du
- 3.5Dative -la
- 4.Connective functions
- 4.1Connective -na
- 4.2Connective -la
- 4.3Connective -ru/du
- 5.Temporal functions
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (22)
Archer, Jon. 2020. Focus Structures in Mùwe Ké: Grammatical Category or Much Ado About Nothing? SOAS, University of London PhD Thesis.
. 2025. The ergative and its differential marking in Mùwe Ké. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 48(1).
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2003. Fictive motion questionnaire. In Nick Enfield (ed.), Field research manual 2003, part I: Multimodal interaction, space, event representation, 81–85. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Driem, George van. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region. Vol. 1 and 21. 21 vols. Leiden: Brill.
Government of Nepal. 2021. National Population and Housing Census 2021: National Report on Caste/Ethnicity, Language & Religion. [URL]. (8 May, 2025).
Hill, Nathan W. 2011. The allative, locative, and terminative cases (la-don) in the Old Tibetan Annals. In Yoshiro Imaeda & Matthew T. Kapstein (eds.), New Studies in the Old Tibetan Documents: Philology, History and Religion, 3–38. Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2002. Documentary and Descriptive Linguistics (full version). In Osamu Sakiyama & Fubito Endo (eds.), Lectures on Endangered Languages 51, 37–83. Kyoto: Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim. [URL]
Ishibashi, Miyuki, Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet. 2006. Trajectoire: matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Fédération de Recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques (CNRS, France). [URL]
Kita, Sotaro. 1995. Enter/exit animation for linguistic elicitation. In David Wilkins (ed.), Extensions of space and beyond: manual for field elicitation for the 1995 field season, 131. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Lohnstein, Horst. 2016. Verum Focus. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, 290–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2010. The Classical Tibetan cases and their transcategoriality: From sacred grammar to modern linguistics. Himalayan Linguistics 9(2).
. 2014. The Tibetic Languages and their Classification. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, 105–129. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Tournadre, Nicolas & Sangda Dorje. 2003. Manual of Standard Tibetan: Language and Civilization. Ithica, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Vuillermet, Marine & Anetta Kopecka. 2019. Trajectoire: a methodological tool for eliciting Path of motion. In Aimée Lahaussois & Marine Vuillermet (eds.), Methodological Tools for Linguistic Description and Typology (Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication 16). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. [URL]
Watters, Stephen A. 2002. The Sounds and Tones of Five Tibetan Languages of the Himalayan Region. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 25(1).
