Effects of the relationships between forms within and across paradigms on lexical processing and
representation
An experimental investigation of Russian nouns
The frequency and distribution of forms within a lexeme’s paradigm affect how quickly forms are accessed (e.g.,
Kostić, 1991; Milin, Filipović Đurđević, &
Moscoso del Prado Martín, 2009; Moscoso del Prado Martı́n, Kostić, & Baayen,
2004). The distribution of forms across paradigms, in contrast, has received little experimental attention. Theoretical
studies investigate the distribution of forms across paradigms because forms vary in how predictive they are of other (unknown)
forms. Such investigations have uncovered typological tendencies (e.g., Ackerman & Malouf,
2013; Stump & Finkel, 2013) and contribute to explanations of
language-specific phenomena (e.g., Sims, 2015; Parker & Sims, To appear). The intersection of these research approaches raises questions about how the
distribution of forms within and across paradigms affects lexical access and representation. Based on forms of
Russian nouns representing two morphosyntactic property sets and lexemes from three inflection classes, it is shown that speakers
are sensitive to differences in form and morphosyntactic property set in a visual lexical decision task. In a priming task,
nominative forms prime locative forms better than vice versa regardless of suffix, despite differences between the same forms in
the lexical decision task. These results suggest that speakers make generalizations about forms across classes, including at the
level of word forms and morphosyntactic property sets.
Article outline
- Paradigms in lexical access and representation
- Forms and frequencies within paradigms
- Remaining questions about paradigmatic structure
- Relationships between forms across classes; implicative structure
- Implicative structure in Russian nouns
- Predictiveness of morphosyntactic property sets
- Predictiveness of forms in different classes
- Experiment 1.Visual lexical decision task
- Method
- Participants
- Stimuli
- Procedure
- Results
- Discussion
- Experiment 2.Masked priming visual lexical decision task
- Method
- Participants
- Stimuli
- Procedure
- Results
- Discussion
- Discussion and conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Ackerman, F., & Malouf, R.
(
2013)
Morphological organization: The low entropy conjecture.
Language, 89(3), 429–464.
Baayen, H. R., Feldman, L. B., & Schreuder, R.
(
2006)
Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words.
Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 290–313.
Baayen, R. H., Lieber, R., & Schreuder, R.
(
1997)
The Morphological Complexity of Simplex Nouns.
Linguistics, 351, 861–877.
Baayen, R. H.
(
2001)
Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H., & Aycock, J.
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M.
(
2011)
An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.
Psychological Review, 118(3), 438–481.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(
2015)
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.
Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Bien, H., Baayen, R. H., & Levelt, W. J. M.
(
2011)
Frequency effects in the production of Dutch deverbal adjectives and inflected verbs.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 683–715.
Blevins, J. P., Milin, P., & Ramscar, M.
(
2017)
The Zipfian paradigm cell filling problem. In
F. Kiefer,
J. P. Blevins, &
H. Bartos (Eds.),
Perspectives on morphological structure: Data and analyses (pp. 141–158). Leiden: Brill.
Bonami, O., & Beniamine, S.
(
2015)
Implicative structure and joint predictiveness. In
V. Pirrelli,
C. Marzi, &
M. Ferro (Eds.),
Word structure and word usage: Proceedings of the NetWordS Final Conference (pp. 4–9). Pisa.
Feldman, L. B., & Fowler, C. A.
(
1987)
The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure.
Memory & Cognition, 15(1), 1–12.
Filipović Đurđević, D., & Milin, P.
(
2018)
Information and learning in processing adjective inflection.
Cortex.
Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J.
(
2003)
The mechanics of masked priming. In
S. Kinoshita &
S. J. Lupker (Eds.),
Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 3–37). New York: Psychology Press.
Frost, R., Grainger, J., & Carreiras, M.
(
2008)
Advances in morphological processing: An introduction.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 933–941.
Kostić, A.
(
1991)
Informational approach to the processing of inflected morphology: Standard data reconsidered.
Psychological Research, 53(1), 62–70.
Kostić, A.
(
1995)
Information load constraints on processing inflected morphology. In
L. B. Feldman (Ed.),
Morphological Aspects of Language Processing (pp. 317–344). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2018)
Whole-word frequency and inflectional paradigm size facilitate Estonian case-inflected noun processing.
Cognition, 1751, 20–25.
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B. V., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2018)
Production of Estonian case-inflected nouns shows whole-word frequency and paradigmatic effects.
Morphology, 28(1), 71–97.
Lukatela, G., Gligorijević, B., Kostić, A., & Turvey, M. T.
(
1980)
Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon.
Memory & Cognition, 8(5), 415–423.
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J.
(
2012)
OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences.
Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324.
Milin, P., Filipović Đurđević, D., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F.
(
2009)
The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian.
Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 50–64.
Milin, P., Kuperman, V., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2009)
Words and paradigms bit by bit: An information-theoretic approach to the processing of inflection and derivation. In
J. P. Blevins &
J. Blevins (Eds.),
Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition (pp. 214–272). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moscoso del Prado Martı́n, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2004)
Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological processing.
Cognition, 94(1), 1–18.
Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J.
(
1994)
Cognitive morphology in finnish: Foundations of a new model.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 423–446.
Parker, J., & Sims, A. D.
To appear).
Irregularity, paradigmatic layers, and the complexity of inflection class systems: A study of Russian nouns. In
P. Arkadiev &
F. Gardani Eds.
The Complexities of Morphology
Plaut, D. C., & Booth, J. R.
(
2000)
Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: Empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing.
Psychological Review, 107(4), 786–823.
R Development Core Team
(
2016)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(
1997)
How complex simplex words can be.
Journal of Memory and Language, 37(1), 118–139.
Sims, A. D.
(
2015)
Inflectional Defectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stump, G. T., & Finkel, R. A.
(
2013)
Morphological typology: From word to paradigm. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stump, G. T., & Finkel, R. A.
(
2015)
Contrasting modes of representation for inflectional systems: Some implications for computing morphological complexity. In
M. Baerman,
D. Brown, &
G. G. Corbett (Eds.),
Understanding and measuring morphological complexity (pp. 119–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tabak, W., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H.
(
2005)
Lexical statistics and lexical processing: semantic density, information complexity, sex, and irregularity in Dutch. In
S. Kepser &
M. Reis (Eds.),
Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives (pp. 529–555). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wurzel, W.
(
1989)
Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zaliznjak, A. A.
(
1977)
Grammatičeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Russkij jazyk.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Parker, Jeff
2021.
On the Relationship between Frequency, Features, and Markedness in Inflection: Experimental Evidence from Russian Nouns.
Languages 6:3
► pp. 130 ff.
Wilmoth, Sasha & John Mansfield
2021.
Inflectional predictability and prosodic morphology in Pitjantjatjara and Yankunytjatjara.
Morphology 31:4
► pp. 355 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.