Part of
Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issuesEdited by Yorick Wilks
[Natural Language Processing 8] 2010
► pp. 211–220
Edited by Yorick Wilks
[Natural Language Processing 8] 2010
► pp. 211–220
A Companion for learning in everyday life
The use of the Companion could have broad learning benefits. For example, cenabling learners to have control over their projects of learning could potentially lead to improved level of self efficacy beliefs (Kim and Balyor, 2006), cimproved IT skills or a general confidence to try new things. We believe that this broader view of the benefits of such a Companion makes the positive cimplications outweigh the negative.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Davies, Chris & Rebecca Eynon
2013. Believers and Non-Believers: How Potential Users Respond to the Prospect of an Onscreen Learning Assistant. SSRN Electronic Journal 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.